Case law

People v. Seumanu

61 Cal. 4th 1293 · California Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2015

Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 545 (1987) (O‘Connor, J., concurring). … Phelps [(1988)] 484 U.S. [231] at p. 246; accord, California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538, 541.)

Best v. Wohlford

144 Cal. 733 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1904

(Rollins v. Wright, 93 Cal. 395 ; Davis v. … In Law v.

Eltinge v. Santos

171 Cal. 278 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1915

On the tenth day of July, 1906, and before the incorporation of the city of Turlock, the board of supervisors of the county of Stanislaus accepted and published an official map of that county. … (City of Los Angeles v. Kysor, 125 Cal. 466 , [ 58 Pac. 90 ]; City of Anaheim v. Langenberger, 134 Cal. 608 , [ 66 Pac. 855 ].)

People v. Gilliam

39 Cal. 2d 235 · California Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1952

Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, and Wallace G. Colthurst, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. SHENK, J. … (People v. Isby, 30 Cal.2d 879, 890 [ 186 P.2d 405 ].)

Pickens v. Johnson

42 Cal. 2d 399 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1954

It was held in the case of Knight v. Board of Administration of State Emp. R. … (Pickens v. Johnson, 107 Cal.App.2d 778 [ 238 P.2d 40 ].)

In Re Gilliam

26 Cal. 2d 860 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1945

The distinction is further clarified in People v. … (People v. Nicholson, 34 Cal.App.2d 327 [ 93 P.2d 223 ]; In re Boatwright, 216 Cal. 677 [ 15 P.2d 755 ]; People v. Dawson, 210 Cal. 366 [ 292 P. 267 ]; People v. Birdsell, 6 Cal.App.2d 749 [ 45 P.2d 378 ].)”

People v. Sanchez

30 Cal. 2d 560 · California Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1947

Here, as in People v. … (People v. Babcock (1911), 160 Cal. 537, 546 [ 117 P. 549 ]; People v. Nakis *574 (1920), 184 Cal. 105,113 [ 193 P. 92 ]; People v. Zirbes (1936), 6 Cal.2d 425, 430 [ 57 P.2d 1319 ] ; People v.

Roche v. Baldwin

135 Cal. 522 · California Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1902

Holmes v. … Canal Co. v.

Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.

180 Cal. 348 · California Supreme Court · May 9, 1919

It was said in Kohler v. … (Blanc v. Paymaster Mining Co., supra.) [7] 3.

Clark v. City of Los Angeles

160 Cal. 317 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1911

W. 103 ]; and State v. Allen, 178 Mo. 555, [ 77 S. W. 868 ].) In People v. … In Oakland v.

Reclamation District No. 833 v. Quigley

8 Cal. 2d 183 · California Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1937

The negotiations for the right of way were concluded in 1921 and two of the then trustees and the appellant all testified that it was agreed between the board and Quigley that the latter was to have the right to put in a … The applicable section is subdivision 4 of section 338 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Hart v. Walton, 9 Cal.

City of Petaluma v. White

152 Cal. 190 · California Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1907

(Ede v. Johnson, 15 Cal. 53; Lutz v. Kinney, 23 Nev. 279 , [ 46 Pac. 257 ]; vol. 2 Century Digest, p. 27.) There was no such statutory requirement here. … Y. 135 ; Poole v. Breese, 114 Ill. 594 , [ 3 N. E. 714 ]; *196 Marling v. Burlington, 67 Iowa 331 , [ 25 N. W. 268 ].) Such an act is, of course, binding on his successor in interest.

People v. French

12 Cal. 2d 720 · California Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1939

(People v. Troche, supra; People v. Leong Fook, supra; State v. Lawrence, 57 Me. 574 .) … McCracken charged the board with having totally failed in proper and efficient control of the liquor problem. The defendant was an employee of said board. Mrs.

Gottstein v. Kelly

206 Cal. 742 · California Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1929

Board of Equalization, 56 Cal. 194, 205 ; Emeric v. Alvarado, 64 Cal. 529, 605 [ 2 Pac. 418 ]; Allen v. McKay & Co., 120 Cal. 332, 334 [ 52 Pac. 828 ]; Hall v. … (Jacoby v. Wolff, 198 Cal. 667 [ 247 Pac. 195 ]; Treadwell v.

Wright v. Broadway Department Store

199 Cal. 562 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1926

In the case of Ensign v. Southern Pac. … (Ensign v. Southern Pac. Co., 193 Cal. 311, 322 [ 223 Pac. 953, 957 ].)

In Re Scaggs

47 Cal. 2d 416 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1956

Brown, Attorney General, and Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent. GIBSON, C.J. … is not correct to say that '[i]t always has been the law in this state that the discretion referred to in section 1272 of the Penal Code ... is not a discretion conferred upon the appellate courts,' as stated in People v.

People v. Bruner

9 Cal. 4th 1178 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1995

On July 25, 1991, the Board of Prison Terms (Board) revoked defendant’s parole on the basis of the three earlier violations, plus his possession of cocaine at the time of his arrest. … In Schubert v.

Strang v. Cabrol

37 Cal. 3d 720 · California Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1984

(Cory v. Shierloh (1981) 29 Cal.3d 430, 437-441 [ 174 Cal.Rptr. 500 , 629 P.2d 8 ].) … When we, in Vesely v. Sager (1971) 5 Cal.3d 153, 167 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 623 , 486 P.2d 151 ], overruled such cases as Cole v. Rush (1955) 45 Cal.2d 345 [ 289 P.2d 450 ] and Lammers v.

Western Ass'n of Short Line R.R. v. R.R. Comm'n

173 Cal. 802 · California Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1916

Exempli gratia, in Georgia Railway Power Co. v. … of Railroad Commrs. v.

Devens v. Goldberg

33 Cal. 2d 173 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1948

In the latter ease plaintiff's injury was caused by the slipping of a board on a platform. The board rested loosely without nailing or other fastening as it had for some years before the accident. … In Dyas v.