Case law

Villanazul v. City of Los Angeles

37 Cal. 2d 718 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1951

(Graham v. Mayor etc. of Fresno, 151 Cal. 465 [ 91 P. 147 ]; Elder v. McDougald supra; People v. Cobb, supra; McClung v. Johnson, 106 Cal.App. 264 [ 289 P. 199 ]; cf. Nicholl v. … They hold only that the Legislature, rather than the county board of supervisors, has the power to fix the salaries of municipal *726 court clerks.

People v. Superior Court (Freeman)

14 Cal. 3d 82 · California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1975

Fleishman, McDaniel, Brown & Weston, David M. Brown and John H. Weston for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION MOSK, J. … In Roaden v.

Chapman College v. Wagener

45 Cal. 2d 796 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1955

Code, § 2332; see Freeman v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.2d 533, 537-538 [ 282 P.2d 857 ] ; Rest., Agency, §§ 9, 272-282.) This rule ordinarily applies in the relation of attorney and client. (Lazzarevich v. … Lazzarevich, 39 Cal.2d 48, 50 [ 244 P.2d 1 ]; see Freeman v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.2d 533, 537-538 [ 282 P.2d 857 ]; 4 A.L.R. 1592 .)

Conservatorship of Wendland

110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 412 · California Supreme Court · Aug 9, 2001

Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497, 509 [ 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 789 , 917 P.2d 628 ]; see also San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 581 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ].) … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

People v. Amer

151 Cal. 303 · California Supreme Court · May 16, 1907

In People v. … In one case, People *309 v.

Fogarty v. Department of Industrial Relations

206 Cal. 102 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1928

Brown. Fogarty was continuously nursed and cared for during the following months. … In Singlaub v. Industrial Acc. Com., 87 Cal.

Ernie v. Trinity Lutheran Church

51 Cal. 2d 702 · California Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1959

ERNIE, Appellant, v. TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH (a Nonprofit Corporation), Respondent. S. F. No. 19821. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Mar. 11, 1959. Joseph A. Brown and Miguel A. Leite for Appellant. John B. … In Young v.

People v. Cortez

77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 733 · California Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1998

v. … J., Mosk, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

People v. Braddock

41 Cal. 2d 794 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1953

Brown, Attorney General, and Michael J. Clemens, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. EDMONDS, J. Raymond M. … On his fourth visit, Mantler was accompanied by inspectors from the Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement and from the Board of Osteopathic Examiners. The other men waited outside.

Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.

62 Cal. 2d 129 · California Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1964

(Turner v. Markham (1909) 156 Cal. 68, 69-70 [ 103 P. 319 ]; Leroy v. Bella Vista Investment Co. (1963) 222 Cal.App.2d 369, 378 [9] [ 35 Cal.Rptr. 128 ] ; Hake v. … Proc., $ 1875, subd. 3; Pearson v. State Social Welfare Board (1960) 54 Cal.2d 184, 210 [13] [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 353 P.2d 33 ].)

Gardiner v. Royer

167 Cal. 238 · California Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1914

Bank v. … Rep. 416]; Upton v. McLaughlin, 105 U. S. 640 , [ 26 L. Ed. 1197 ] ; Waterfield v. Rice, 111 Fed. 625 ; [ 49 C. C. A. 504 ] ; Board of Commrs. v. Vandriss, 115 Fed. 866 , [ 53 C. C. A. 192 ].

Skopp v. Weaver

16 Cal. 3d 432 · California Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1976

Brown (1896) 113 Cal. 15, 17-18 [ 45 P. 14 ]) and that numerous cases have held a pleading of agency an averment of ultimate fact. (Farr v. Bramblett (1955) 132 Cal.App.2d 36, 47 [ 281 P.2d 372 ]; 6 Phillips v. … As we stated in Minsky v.

People v. Ayala

24 Cal. 243 · California Supreme Court · Aug 28, 2000

The boards that are in red represent his violent acts, and the board that is in purple represents the underlying crimes in the body shop.” In sum, she said nothing that might mislead the jury as defendant suggests. … (See People v. Lucas (1995) 12 Cal.4th 415, 478 [ 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 525 , 907 P.2d 373 ].) Disposition The judgment is affirmed. Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Warner Bros. Co. v. Freud

131 Cal. 639 · California Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1901

In Erwin v. … The board levied the tax pursuant to the judgment, and afterward appealed from the judgment which they had executed.

Emeric v. Alvarado

64 Cal. 529 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1884

(Young v. Young, Cro. Car. 86; Combers v. … (See on this point Suydam v. Williamson, 20 How. 427 ; Brickhead v. Brown, 5 Hill, 634 , opinion by Bronson, J.; Miller v. Shackelford, 4 Dana, 261 ; 4 Minor’s Institutes, 752.)

Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Cranston

58 Cal. 2d 462 · California Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1962

(See also Di Genova v. State Board of Education, 57 Cal.2d 167, 172-173 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ]; Corning Hospital Dist. v. Superior Court, 57 Cal.2d 488, 494 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 621 , 370 P.2d 325 ].) … (Mudd v.

Snyder v. Michael's Stores, Inc.

16 Cal. 4th 991 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1997

In Cole v. … J., Mosk, J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. All further unspecified statutory references are to the Labor Code.

Bolar v. Maxwell Hardware Co.

205 Cal. 396 · California Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1928

The projectiles tore a hole through the “target,” a large sign-board, but the contrivance exploded and as a result of either the recoil or the bursting of it, plaintiff was thrown to the ground and his right knee-cap was … W. 776 ; Thornton v. Ionia Fair Assn., 229 Mich. 1 [ 200 N. W. 958 ]; Shields v. Costello (Mo. App.), 229 S. W. 411 ; Holmes v. Delaware & Hudson Co., 128 App. Div. 24 [ 112 N. Y.

Geibel v. State Bar

11 Cal. 2d 412 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1938

Fowler Estate, Ltd., v. Kneeben et al., No. 401—J; (2) Elt B. Fowler Estate, Ltd., v. McDuffie et al., No. 541—J; (3) Fowler and Geibel v. Seymour, No. 825-Y; (4) Holmgreen Estate, Ltd., v. … Ed. 60 ], and Munn v. Illinois, 94 U. S. 113, 134 [ 24 L.

Hammond v. Cailleaud

111 Cal. 206 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1896

That in sales under a decree in equity the purchaser becomes a quasi party to the suit, see note to Mount v„ Brown, 69 Am. Dec. 368 , and cases there cited, and Jones on Mortgages, sec. 1642. … (Mayer v. Wick, 15 Ohio St. 548 .) In Galpin v.