Case law

Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.

10 Cal. 2d 442 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1937

Likewise in Endicott v. … Ed. 825 ]; Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U. S. 231, 238 [38 Sup. Ct. 242, 62 L. Ed. 683 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 1207]; United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 U. S. 106, 179, 180 [31 Sup. Ct. 632, 55 L.

People v. Superior Court (Freeman)

14 Cal. 3d 82 · California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1975

Fleishman, McDaniel, Brown & Weston, David M. Brown and John H. Weston for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION MOSK, J. … In Roaden v.

People v. Cortez

77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 733 · California Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1998

v. … J., Mosk, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Clark v. McClurg

215 Cal. 279 · California Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1932

(Chavez v. Times-Mirror Co., 72 Cal. App. 694, 696 [ 237 Pac. 1085 ]; Pickwick Stages v. Board of Trustees, 54 Cal. App. 730, 731 [ 215 Pac. 558 ] ; Warfield v. Krueger, 96 Cal. App. 671 [ 274 Pac. 764, 765 ].) … (Lewis v. Hayes, 177 Cal. 587, 591 [ 171 Pac. 293 ]; Dunn v. Hearst, 139 Cal. 239, 240 [ 73 Pac. 138 ]; Childers v. Mercury P. & P. Co., 105 Cal. 284, 289 [ 45 Am. St.

Moore v. Moffatt

188 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1922

No demand has ever been made by the board of directors of said corporation for the unpaid balance of the purchase price of said stock and no assessment levied. … App. 622 [ 195 Pac. 941 ]; Raimond v. Eldridge, 43 Cal. 506 ; Gardiner v. Schmaelzle, 47 Cal. 588 ; Coffey v. Greenfield, 62 Cal. 602 ; Miller v. Luco, 80 Cal. 257 [ 22 Pac. 195 ]; Daley v.

Emeric v. Alvarado

64 Cal. 529 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1884

(Young v. Young, Cro. Car. 86; Combers v. … (See on this point Suydam v. Williamson, 20 How. 427 ; Brickhead v. Brown, 5 Hill, 634 , opinion by Bronson, J.; Miller v. Shackelford, 4 Dana, 261 ; 4 Minor’s Institutes, 752.)

State Building & Construction Trades Council v. City of Vista

54 Cal. 4th 547 · California Supreme Court · Jul 2, 2012

Seal Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Seal Beach, supra, 36 Cal.3d 591, that the meet-and-confer provision of the Meyers- Milias-Brown Act (MMBA) (Gov. … S. v.

Kern Oil Co. v. Crawford

143 Cal. 298 · California Supreme Court · May 18, 1904

The late case of Oregon King Mining Co. v. Brown, 119 Fed. 48 , is in accord with the opinion of the Department. The case of McKindley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United, Mining Co., 183 U. … Co. v.

Hammond v. Cailleaud

111 Cal. 206 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1896

That in sales under a decree in equity the purchaser becomes a quasi party to the suit, see note to Mount v„ Brown, 69 Am. Dec. 368 , and cases there cited, and Jones on Mortgages, sec. 1642. … (Mayer v. Wick, 15 Ohio St. 548 .) In Galpin v.

Snyder v. Michael's Stores, Inc.

16 Cal. 4th 991 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1997

In Cole v. … J., Mosk, J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. All further unspecified statutory references are to the Labor Code.

County of Sutter v. Nicols

152 Cal. 688 · California Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1908

The act contains many other provisions relating to the administrative duties and powers of the board, which are not important to the question. … Co. v. Central Pac. R. R. Co., 51 Cal. 271 ; Lorenz v. Jacobs, 63 Cal. 73 ; Dower v. Richards, 73 Cal. 480 , [ 15 Pac. 105 ]; Amador etc. Co. v. De Witt, 73 Cal. 485 , [ 15 Pac. 74 ].)

Haight v. Costanich

184 Cal. 426 · California Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1920

(Sturr v. Beck, 133 U. S. 541 , [ 33 L. Ed. 761 , 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 350, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes] ; McGuire v. Brown, 106 Cal. 660 , [30 D. R. A. 384, 39 Pac. 1060 ].) … (Gardner v.

People v. Williams

83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 275 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1999

Following the reasoning of People v. … For example, in Colorado v.

Kizer v. County of San Mateo

53 Cal. 3d 139 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1991

Younger v. … (Hale v. Morgan (1978) 22 Cal.3d 388, 398 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 375 , 584 P.2d 512 ]; see also, Beeman v.

Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.

62 Cal. 2d 129 · California Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1964

(Turner v. Markham (1909) 156 Cal. 68, 69-70 [ 103 P. 319 ]; Leroy v. Bella Vista Investment Co. (1963) 222 Cal.App.2d 369, 378 [9] [ 35 Cal.Rptr. 128 ] ; Hake v. … Proc., $ 1875, subd. 3; Pearson v. State Social Welfare Board (1960) 54 Cal.2d 184, 210 [13] [ 5 Cal.Rptr. 553 , 353 P.2d 33 ].)

California Oregon Power Co. v. Superior Court

45 Cal. 2d 858 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1955

In Henry Ford & Son v. … Co. v.

People v. Martinez

11 Cal. 4th 434 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1995

(Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477, 485 [ 208 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 691 P.2d 272 ]; People v. Barksdale (1972) 8 Cal.3d 320, 334 [ 105 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 503 P.2d 257 ].) … (Voters for Responsible Retirement v. Board of Supervisors (1994) 8 Cal.4th 765, 772-773 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 814 , 884 P.2d 645 ].)

Skopp v. Weaver

16 Cal. 3d 432 · California Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1976

Brown (1896) 113 Cal. 15, 17-18 [ 45 P. 14 ]) and that numerous cases have held a pleading of agency an averment of ultimate fact. (Farr v. Bramblett (1955) 132 Cal.App.2d 36, 47 [ 281 P.2d 372 ]; 6 Phillips v. … As we stated in Minsky v.

Geibel v. State Bar

11 Cal. 2d 412 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1938

Fowler Estate, Ltd., v. Kneeben et al., No. 401—J; (2) Elt B. Fowler Estate, Ltd., v. McDuffie et al., No. 541—J; (3) Fowler and Geibel v. Seymour, No. 825-Y; (4) Holmgreen Estate, Ltd., v. … Ed. 60 ], and Munn v. Illinois, 94 U. S. 113, 134 [ 24 L.

Faulkner v. Hendy

103 Cal. 15 · California Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1894

Lord Brougham, in Docker v. Somes, 2 Mylne & K. 655, answers this question. … (See Brown v. De Tastat, 1 Jacob, 284; Crawshay v. Collins, 2 Russ. 325; Featherstonhaugh v.. Turner, 25 Beav. 382; ( Willett v. Blanford, 1 Hare, 253.)