Case law

Cavallaro v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

110 Cal. 348 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1895

(Hickman v. Alpaugh, 21 Cal. 225 ; Shumway v. Leakey, 67 Cal. 460 ; Marsters v. Lash, 61 Cal. 624 ; Mortimer v. Harder, 93 Cal. 172 .) 2. … (Hicks v. Coleman, 25 Cal. 122 ; 85 Am. Dec. 103 ; Sill v. Reese, 47 Cal. 294 ; Rider v. Edgar, 54 Cal. 127 ; Shea v. Potrero etc. R. R. Co., 44 Cal. 414 ; Brown v. Kentfield, 50 Cal. 129 ; Robinson v. Western Pac. R.

Robinson v. Kerrigan

151 Cal. 40 · California Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1907

(Arndt v. Griggs, 134 U. S. 321 , [10 Sup. Ct. 557] ; People v. Simon, 176 Ill. 165 , [ 68 Am. St. Rep. 175 , 52 N. E. 910 ] ; Hamilton v. Brown, 161 U.S. 256 , [16 Sup. Ct. 585].) 2. … (People v. Parks, 58 Cal. 636 ; Ex parte Liddell, 93 Cal. 633 , [ 29 Pac. 251 ] ; Hellman v. Shoulters, 114 Cal. 136 , [ 44 Pac. 915 , 45 Pac. 1057 ] ; People v. Linda Vista Irr.

California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles

54 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1991

V. … Co. v.

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.

16 Cal. 4th 694 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1997

Bacich v. Board of Control (1943) 23 Cal.2d 343, 349 [ 144 P.2d 818 ] (Bacich).) … J., Mosk, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. Unless otherwise noted, further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.

McKesson v. Lowery

51 Cal. 2d 660 · California Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1959

(Larew v. Newman, 81 Cal. 588, 590 [ 23 P. 227 ]; Storke v. Goux, 129 Cal. 526, 527 [ 62 P. 68 ]; Harrison v. Colgan, 148 Cal. 69, 73-75 [ 82 P. 674 ]; Robbins v. Lambert, 43 Cal.App.2d 463, 465 [ 111 P.2d 5 ].) … Colgan, supra, 148 Cal. 69, 73, 75, 78 ; Lancaster v. Board of Commissioners, 115 Colo. 261 [ 171 P.2d 987, 989 , 166 A.L.R. 839 ]; Clark v. Frohmiller, 53 Ariz. 286 [ 88 P.2d 542, 545 ] ; Thornsberry v.

People v. Holladay

25 Cal. 300 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1864

Hastings v. … It would be impossible to fix a valuation upon property so assessed, nor could the valuation be corrected by the Board of Equalization.

Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McCleverty

161 Cal. 285 · California Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1911

The right of a debtor to waive a sale by parcels applies equally to a deed of trust (Brown v. … (Marvel v. Cobb, 200 Mass. 293 ; [ 86 N. E. 360 ]; Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Rink, 110 Ill. 538 ; Garland v. Watson, 74 Ala. 323 ; Sloan v. Coolbaugh, 10 Iowa 31 .)

People v. Castillo

16 Cal. 4th 1009 · California Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1997

BROWN, J., Concurring. … (People v. Sears, supra, 2 Cal.3d 180, 190 ; see People v. Rincon-Pineda, supra, 14 Cal.3d 864, 885 ; see also, e.g., People v.

Loveland v. Bogliolio

162 Cal. 595 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1912

(Ames v. Ames, 40 Or. 495 , [ 67 Pac. 737 ]; Chase v. Spencer, 150 Mich. 99 , [113 N. W. 578]; Schindler v. Parzoo, 52 Or. 452 , [ 97 Pac. 755 ]; Small v. Champeny, 102 Wis. 61 , [ 78 N. W. 407 ] ; Terry v. … (Schindler v. Parzoo, 52 Or. 452 , [ 97 Pac. 755 ]; Giles v. Hodge, 74 Wis. 360 , [ 43 N. W. 163 ]; Deleglise v. Morrissey, 142 Wis. 234 , [ 125 N. W. 452 ].)

Cory v. Shierloh

29 Cal. 3d 430 · California Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1981

In Vesely v. … (See Cooper v. Bray (1978) 21 Cal.3d 841, 847-848 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 148 , 582 P.2d 604 ]; Brown v. Merlo (1973) 8 Cal.3d 855, 861 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 388 , 506 P.2d 212 , 66 A.L.R.3d 505 ].)

People v. Findley

132 Cal. 301 · California Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1901

(Higgins v. San Diego, 126 Cal. 303, 312 .) 2. … The first instruction quoted is copied from the opinion of the court in People v.

Nat. Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. State of California

235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 54 · California Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2018

The Court of Appeal relied on Board of Supervisors v. McMahon (1990) 219 Cal.App.3d 286 (McMahon), but that case does not authorize judicial invalidation of a statute on the ground that compliance is impossible. … Finally, in Buck v.

Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.

22 Cal. 2d 337 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1943

Thompson, supra, a statute penalizing such acts as throwing a switch, removing a rail, or placing any obstruction on any railroad with the intention of derailing any train, boarding a train with the intention of robbing the … (See People v. Shotwell, supra; People v. Frank, 28 Cal. 507 ; People v. Twedt, supra; People v. Clemett, supra.)

People v. Williams

83 Cal. Rptr. 2d 275 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1999

Following the reasoning of People v. … For example, in Colorado v.

Prince v. City of Fresno

88 Cal. 407 · California Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1891

or may be allowed by law to justices of the peace for like services, except that for his services in criminal prosecution for violation of ordinances he shall be entitled to receive *410 only such monthly salary as the board … As to a very similar statute conferring jurisdiction upon a recorder, it was said in Curtis v.

Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los Angeles

188 Cal. 491 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1922

Soc. v. San Francisco, 133 Cal. 14 [ 65 Pac. 16 ]; Fenton v. Edwards, 126 Cal. 43 [ 77 Am. St. Rep. 141 , 46 L. R. A. 832, 58 Pac. 320 ]; Mackay v. San Francisco, 128 Cal. 678 [ 61 Pac. 382 ]; People v. … Appellant’s counsel cite as the correct rule a quotation from Board of Assessors v. Comptoir National, 191 U. S. 388 [ 48 L. Ed. 232 , 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 109, see, also, Rose’s U. S.

Haight v. Costanich

184 Cal. 426 · California Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1920

(Sturr v. Beck, 133 U. S. 541 , [ 33 L. Ed. 761 , 10 Sup. Ct. Rep. 350, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes] ; McGuire v. Brown, 106 Cal. 660 , [30 D. R. A. 384, 39 Pac. 1060 ].) … (Gardner v.

Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. All Parties and Persons

6 Cal. 2d 197 · California Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1936

(Galt County Water Dist. v. Evans, 10 Cal. App. (2d) 116 [ 51 Pac. (2d) 202 ].) We do not accept appellants’ view that the case of Capuchino Land Co. v. Board of Trustees, 34 Cal. … (Miller & Lux v. Secara, 193 Cal. 755 [ 227 Pac. 171 ]; People *201 v. Los Angeles, 93 Cal. App. 532 [ 269 Pac. 934 ].)

People v. Panah

25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 672 · California Supreme Court · Mar 14, 2005

(People v. Brown, supra, 31 Cal.4th at p. 553 .) … Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 401; see Tuilaepa v.

Jenison v. Redfield

149 Cal. 500 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1906

We do not understand the contrary to have been held in Board of Directors v. Tregea, 88 Cal. 334, 353 , [ 26 Pac. 237 ].