Case law

Mannheim v. Superior Court

3 Cal. 3d 678 · California Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1970

(Merrill v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1969) 71 Cal.2d 907, 918 [ 80 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 458 P.2d 33 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … Com. v.

Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's Sons

145 Cal. 671 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1905

The evidence as to the meaning of the condition “subject to prompt reply” brings the case within the principle discussed in Blumenthal v. Goodall, 89 Cal. 256 , and distinguishes it from Brown v. Pforr, 38 Cal. 550 . … In Zeimer v. Antisell, 75 Cal. 509 , the court quotes from Sibbald v. Bethlehem Iron Co., 83 N.

People v. La Rue

67 Cal. 526 · California Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1885

It was admitted at the trial that defendants were elected trustees of Swamp Land District No. 407, pursuant to an order of the board of supervisors, and after due notice thereof. … (Dean v. Davis, 51 Cal. 409 .) Reclamation District Ho. 407 is either a corporation, or it is not.

Varjabedian v. City of Madera

20 Cal. 3d 285 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1977

County of Los Angeles (1965) 62 Cal.2d 250, 263 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 398 P.2d 129 ], quoting from Bacich v. Board of Control (1943) 23 Cal.2d 343, 350 [ 144 P.2d 818 ].) … (See, e.g., Bauer v. County of Ventura (1955) 45 Cal.2d 276 [ 289 P.2d 1 ]; Clement v. State Reclamation Board (1950) 35 Cal.2d 628 [ 220 P.2d 897 ]; Sheffet v.

Lucas v. Rea

7 Cal. Unrep. 363 · California Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1909

In Reed v. … Wilson v. Nugent, 125 Cal. 280 , 57 Pac. 1008 , Buell v. Brown, 131 Cal. 158 , 63 Pac. 167 , and Nofziger Bros. Lumber Co. v. Shafer, 2 Cal. App. 219 , 83 Pac. 284 , are to the same effect.

Thomas v. Wentworth Hotel Co.

158 Cal. 275 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1910

In Peck v. … It can make no difference that in Pinney v. Nelson and Peck v.

People v. Tom

59 Cal. 4th 1210 · California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2014

Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 534 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 73 P.3d 1137 ] [unanimous opinion of the court by Werdegar, J.].) … Miranda v.

Vater v. County of Glenn

49 Cal. 2d 815 · California Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1958

(Palmquist v. Mercer, 43 Cal.2d 92, 101 [ 272 P.2d 26 ]; Ward v. Oakley Co., 125 Cal.App.2d 840, 850-851 [ 271 P.2d 536 ]; Brooks v. City of Monterey, 106 Cal.App. 649, 654 [ 290 P. 540 ]; cf. People v. … (Taylor v. Knox County Board of Education, 292 Ky. 767 [ 167 S.W.2d 700 ]; Rogers v. Butler, 170 Tenn. 125 [ 92 S.W.2d 414 ].)

Parker v. Womack

37 Cal. 2d 116 · California Supreme Court · May 8, 1951

In Polk v. City of Los Angeles, 26 Cal.2d 519 [ 159 P.2d 931 ], and Jolley v. … Corp., 25 Cal.2d 165 [ 153 P.2d 338 ]; Brown v. George Pepperdine Foundation, 23 Cal.2d 256 [ 143 P.2d 929 ]; Copley v. Putter, 93 Cal.App.2d 453 [ 207 P.2d 876 ]; Jones v. Scurlock, 96 Cal.App.2d 201 [ 214 P.2d 599 ].)

County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

62 Cal. 2d 839 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1965

Code, § 22.3; Corning Hospital Dist. v. … (Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, 348 U.S. 483, 489 [ 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 ] ; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners, 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ].)

Laverone v. Mangianti

41 Cal. 138 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1871

Elliott, 5 Strob. 198 ; Loomis v. Terry, 17 Wend. 496 ; Jones v. Perry, 2 Esp. 482; Norris Peak, 487 S. C.; Blackman v. Simmons, 3 Carr. & Payne, 138; Popperell v. Rine, 10 Cush. 509 .) … (Sarch v. Blackburn, 4 Carr. & Paine, 237; Curtis v. Mills, 5 id. 489.) In Ficken v.

Rivieccio v. Bothan

27 Cal. 2d 621 · California Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1946

(Aldrich v. Aldrich, 203 Cal. 433, 437 [ 264 P. 754 ]; Stern v. Judson, 163 Cal. 726, 735 [ 127 P. 38 ]; Doyle v. Hampton, 159 Cal. 729, 733 [ 116 P. 39 ]; Parsons v. Weis, 144 Cal. 410, 419 [ 77 P. 1007 ]; Dunlap v. … (Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co., 21 Cal.2d 718, 734 [ 134 P.2d 777 ] ; Fry v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.2d 753, 761 [ 112 P.2d 229 ].)

People v. Thomas

53 Cal. 4th 771 · California Supreme Court · Feb 23, 2012

(See People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 566.) 10. … Harris, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 365; People v. Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 402.)

Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Abila

106 Cal. 355 · California Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1895

Dist. v. … That case merely holds that, “ in a proper case,” the board of supervisors may include a town or city lot within the boundaries of an irrigation district.

Ramos v. County of Madera

4 Cal. 3d 685 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1971

(Elder v. … Lehmann v. L. A. City Board of Education, 154 Cal.App.2d 256 [ 316 P.2d 55 ].)

Sweasey v. Sweasey

126 Cal. 123 · California Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1899

Something of the kind is intimated by Judge Field in Conant v. Conant, 10 Cal. 249 , 70 Am. Dec. 717 . … I think it was. intended by section 136 to enable the court to do just what it. was said in Conant v.

People v. Penunuri

233 Cal. Rptr. 3d 324 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 2018

Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 541 (Brown), italics in original.) … (Brown, supra, 31 Cal.4th at p. 541; see also People v.

Lake v. Reed

16 Cal. 4th 448 · California Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1997

(Bixby v. … J., Mosk, J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied October 22, 1997.

Stout v. Turney

22 Cal. 3d 718 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1978

Board of Trade (1958) 164 Cal.App.2d 636, 651-652 [ 331 P.2d 89 ].) … (See also Snelson v.

Ames v. Southern Pacific Co.

141 Cal. 728 · California Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1904

Co. v. … (See, also, Peck v. New York Cent. etc. R. R. Co., 70 N. Y. 587 ; McRae v. Wilmington etc. R. R. Co., 88 N. C. 532 ; 1 Wright v. California Cent. Ry. Co., 78 Cal. 360 .)