Case law

Watterson v. Owens River Canal Co.

190 Cal. 88 · California Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1922

(Stein v. Leeman, 161 Cal. 505 [ 119 Pac. 663 ]; Davis v. Le Mesnager, 155 Cal. 520 [101 Pac. 910]; Glassell v. Hansen, 149 Cal. 511 [ 87 Pac. 200 ]; Falkner v. … J. 26, 27; Klamath Lumber Co. v. Bamber, 74 Or. 287 [ 142 Pac. 359 , 145 Pac. 650 ]; Brown v. Fletcher’s Estate, 146 Mich. 401 [ 123 Am. St. Rep. 233 , 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 632, 109 N. W. 686 ]; Crane v.

Southern Pacific Co. v. Pillsbury

170 Cal. 782 · California Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1915

In Zikos v. Oregon etc. … In Eng v.

County of Sonoma v. City of Santa Rosa

102 Cal. 426 · California Supreme Court · May 14, 1894

This is an action brought by the county of Sonoma against the city of Santa Rosa to recover three hundred and seventy-one dollars and seventy cents, alleged to have been paid by the county to the sheriff for boarding prisoners … Tweed v.

Ryan v. Commission on Judicial Performance

45 Cal. 3d 518 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1988

(Wenger v. Commission on Judicial Performance (1981) 29 Cal.3d 615, 622 [ 175 Cal.Rptr. 420 , 630 P.2d 954 ]; Spruance v. … As we stated in Gonzalez v.

Gardner v. Jonathan Club

35 Cal. 2d 343 · California Supreme Court · May 5, 1950

(Mateer v. Brown, 1 Cal. 221, 227 .) Under the statutes as amended, however, his liability is that of a depositary for hire. … (Hoffman v. Eastman Kodak Co., 99 Cal.App. 436, 438 [ 278 P. 891 ]; Providence Washington Ins. Co. v. Hotel Marysville, Inc., 60 Cal.App.2d 338, 344 [ 140 P.2d 698 ]; Homan v.

Lake v. Reed

16 Cal. 4th 448 · California Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1997

(Bixby v. … J., Mosk, J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied October 22, 1997.

Thomason v. Ruggles

69 Cal. 465 · California Supreme Court · May 1, 1886

In Staude v. … It was so held by a majority of this court in the recent case entitled People v. Strother, 67 Cal. 624 . For the reasons here given, I concur in the judgment.

In Re Critchlow

11 Cal. 2d 751 · California Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1938

(Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U. S. 547 [12 Sup. Ct. 195, 35 L. Ed. 1110 ]; Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591 [16 Sup. Ct. 644, 40 L. Ed. 819 ]; Ex parte Cohen, 104 Cal. 524 [ 38 Pac. 364 , 43 Am. St. Rep. 127 , 26 L. R. … (People v.

People v. Turner

272 Cal. Rptr. 3d 50 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2020

(People v. Jones (2012) 54 Cal.4th 1, 41; see Uttecht v. Brown (2007) 551 U.S. 1, 7.) … (See Brown v. 53  PEOPLE v. TURNER Opinion of the Court by Corrigan, J. Sanders (2006) 546 U.S. 212, 220.)

People v. Hill

70 Cal. 2d 678 · California Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1969

(People v. Downer, 57 Cal.2d 800, 813 [16] [ 22 Cal.Rptr. 347 , 372 P.2d 107 ]; People v. Watson, 244 Cal.App.2d 89, 96 [5] [ 52 Cal.Rptr. 821 ]; People v. Lugo, 220 Cal.App.2d 54, 58-59 [2] [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 572 ].) … She was 5'5" tall, had light brown hair and freckles, which “you couldn’t notice from far away.” He grabbed her from behind around the neck with his right forearm. Mrs.

Stockton School District v. Wright

134 Cal. 64 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1901

If, in any district, there has been an average daily attendance of only five, or less, during the whole school year, the superintendent shall suspend the district and report such fact to the board of supervisors. (Pol. … (People v. Craycroft, 111 Cal. 544 .) We advise that the judgment be reversed and the court be- . low directed to dismiss the proceedings. Haynes, C., and Gray, C., concurred.

Vater v. County of Glenn

49 Cal. 2d 815 · California Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1958

(Palmquist v. Mercer, 43 Cal.2d 92, 101 [ 272 P.2d 26 ]; Ward v. Oakley Co., 125 Cal.App.2d 840, 850-851 [ 271 P.2d 536 ]; Brooks v. City of Monterey, 106 Cal.App. 649, 654 [ 290 P. 540 ]; cf. People v. … (Taylor v. Knox County Board of Education, 292 Ky. 767 [ 167 S.W.2d 700 ]; Rogers v. Butler, 170 Tenn. 125 [ 92 S.W.2d 414 ].)

County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

62 Cal. 2d 839 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1965

Code, § 22.3; Corning Hospital Dist. v. … (Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, 348 U.S. 483, 489 [ 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 ] ; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners, 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ].)

Ex Parte King

157 Cal. 161 · California Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1910

As was said in Grumbach v. … The case of Van Harlingen v.

Gallik v. Superior Court

5 Cal. 3d 855 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1971

The officer nevertheless searched under the seat and brought out a brown leather bag. He opened it, and found inside a plastic “baggie" containing a small amount of marijuana. … Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ], Camara v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 930 , 87 S.Ct. 1727 ], People v.

Spotts v. Hanley

85 Cal. 155 · California Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1890

(Sheldon v. Mull, 67 Cal. 300 ; Howell v. Rodgers, 47 Cal. 291 .) … (Read v. Allen, 56 Tex. 176 -180.) It was also held in the case of Read v.

Taylor v. Johnston

15 Cal. 3d 130 · California Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1975

Co. v. Westview Dev. Co. (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 594, 602-603 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 302 ]; Atkinson v. … (Guerrieri v. Severini, supra, 51 Cal.2d 12, 18 ; Atkinson v. District Bond Co., supra, 5 Cal.App.2d 738, 743-744 .)

People v. Pokovich

48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 158 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 2006

(See United States v. Ortega (9th Cir. 2000) 203 F.3d 675 [statements may be used to impeach]; United States v. Brown (2d Cir. 1983) 699 F.2d 585 [statements may not be used to impeach]; People v. … Brown (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 461 [ 49 Cal.Rptr.2d 652 ] [statements may be used to impeach]; People v. Harper (1991) 228 Cal.App.3d 843 [ 279 Cal.Rptr. 204 ] [statements may not be used to impeach].)

Matter of Dodge

135 Cal. 512 · California Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1902

Pay, then district attorney of the county of Kern, brought a number of suits of this character and recovered judgments therein, and thereupon he presented a claim to the state board of examiners for the costs and expenses … (County of Kern v. Fay, 131 Cal. 547 .)

People v. Soeder

150 Cal. 12 · California Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1906

(See People v. Cook, 148 Cal. 334 , [83 Pac. 43, 46, 50]; People v. Suesser, 142 Cal. 354, 363 , [ 75 Pac. 1093 ].) In People v. … Brown, 130 Cal. 591, 594 , [ 62 Pac. 1072 ], this court, quoting approvingly from People v. Stout, 4 Park. C. C. (N.