Case law

People v. Osuna

70 Cal. 2d 759 · California Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1969

He carried a .22 caliber pistol with a long shiny barrel and wore a black nylon windbreaker, light blue denim pants, black shoes, green gloves, and a brown-purple hood. … (Stovall v. Denno (1967) 388 U.S. 293 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 ]; People v. Feggans (1967) 67 Cal.2d 444, 448 [ 62 Cal.Rptr. 419 , 432 P.2d 21 ].)

People v. Ghent

43 Cal. 3d 739 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1987

(People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 541 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 726 P.2d 516 ]; see People v. Frierson, supra, 25 Cal.3d 142, 178 .) For the same reason the 1977 law is valid on its face. … (See People v. Allen, supra, 42 Cal.3d 1222, 1285-1288 ; People v. Rodriquez, supra, 42 Cal.3d 730, 777-779 ; People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at pp. 538-545; People v.

People v. Hall

62 Cal. 2d 104 · California Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1964

The sergeants noticed a brown splotch on the bottom of the defendant’s right shoe. Both shoes were removed and given to chemical experts who performed benzidine tests for the presence of blood. … (Rogers v. Superior Court, 46 Cal.2d 3, 10 [ 291 P.2d 929 ]; cf. McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 [ 63 S.Ct. 608 , 87 L.Ed. 819 ]; Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 [ 77 S.Ct. 1356 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1479 ].)

Oliver v. Campbell

43 Cal. 2d 298 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1954

Buckley, 164 Cal. 160 [ 128 P. 29 ]; Davidson v. Laughlin, 138 Cal. 320 [ 71 P. 345 , 5 L.R.A.N.S. 579 ]; Brown v. Crown Gold Milling Co., 150 Cal. 376 [ 89 P. 86 ].) … (O’Connor v. Dingley, 26 Cal. 11 ; Castagnino v. Balletta, 82 Cal. 250 [ 23 P. 127 ]; Donegan v.

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

216 Cal. 40 · California Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1932

Corp. v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra.) … Christy's Admr., 24 Mo. 474 ; State ex rel. v. Woodward, 8 Mo. 353 ; State ex rel. v. Sandusky, 46 Mo. 381; Board of Education v. National Surety Co., 183 Mo. 166, 184 [ 82 S. W. 70 ]; Showles v. Freeman, 81 Mo. 540 .)

In Re Coleman

12 Cal. 3d 568 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1974

Union v. Superior Court (1951) supra, 103 Cal.App.2d 512, 552-553 .) … (United States v. White (1944) supra, 322 U.S. 694, 702 [ 88 L.Ed. 1542, 1548 ]; see also Lawlor v. Loewe (1914) 235 U.S. 522 [ 59 L.Ed. 341 , 35 S.Ct. 170 ].)

Agricultural Prorate Commission v. Superior Court

5 Cal. 2d 550 · California Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1936

(Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477, 485 [ 234 Pac. 381 , 38 A. L. R. 1479].) … The board fixed the price and Nebbia sold milk below the price fixed. His prosecution followed. He was convicted of a violation of the statute and his conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals (People v.

Goodenow v. Ewer

16 Cal. 461 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1860

(See Nagle v. Macy, 9 Cal. 426 ; Haffley v. Maier, 13 Id. 13; Koch v. Briggs, 14 Id. 256; Clark v. Baker, Id. 612; and Johnson v. Sherman, 15 Id.) … (Kohler v. Kohler, 2 Edw. Ch. 69 ; Post v. Leet, 8 Paige, 337 ; Seaman v. Hicks, 8 Id. 665; Darvin v. Hatfield, 4 Sand. Sup. Ct. 468; Brown v. Frost, 10 Paige, 243 .)

People v. Jones

53 Cal. 3d 1115 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1991

Two years after defendant’s trial, in People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ] (revd. on other grounds sub nom. California v. … Because of this conclusion, we need not address the continuing validity of People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d 512 , in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Blystone v.

Woodcock v. Fontana Scaffolding & Equipment Co.

69 Cal. 2d 452 · California Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1968

(Witt v. Jackson, 57 Cal.2d 57, 73 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 366 P.2d 641 ]; see Smith v. Trapp, *456 249 Cal.App.2d 929 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 229 ]; Souza v. Pratico, supra, 245 Cal.App.2d 651 ; Harness v. … Birdwell, 44 Cal.2d 839, 851 [ 285 P.2d 919 ]; Brown v. Regan, 10 Cal.2d 519, 523-524 [ 75 P.2d 1063 ]; Fransen v. Washington, 229 Cal.App.2d 570, 574 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 458 ]; County of Humboldt v.

Hobbs v. Duff

23 Cal. 596 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

The right of the plaintiff, in foreclosure suits, to a personal judgment for the amount of the debt, under this section, was established by the decisions of this Court in: (Rollins v. Forbes, 10 Cal. 299 ; Brown v. … (Fair v. McIver, 16 East, 130.)

Porter v. Brooks

35 Cal. 199 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1868

(Gilman v. Brown, 1 Mason, 221 .) So, also, in Sparks v. Hess, 15 Cal. 198 , Mr. … In Hill v.

California Trust Co. v. Bennett

33 Cal. 2d 694 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1949

(Wheeland v. … (See Uhl v. Badaracco, 199 Cal. 270, 282 [ 248 P. 917 ]; Driscoll v. East-West Dairymen’s Assn., 52 Cal.App.2d 468, 472 [ 126 P.2d 647 ]; Goodman v. Board of Education, 48 Cal.

Hersh v. Garau

218 Cal. 460 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1933

In Laack v. Dimmick, 95 Cal. … And in Russell v.

Michigan Trust Co. v. Bronson

192 Cal. 506 · California Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1923

Co. v. Bauerle, 143 Ill. 459 [ 33 N. … The act of Congress establishing the federal reserve board (38 U. S. Stats. 251, 262, c. 6) gives the board authority to grant national banks the right to act as trustee, executor, or administrator.

County of Sonoma v. City of Santa Rosa

102 Cal. 426 · California Supreme Court · May 14, 1894

This is an action brought by the county of Sonoma against the city of Santa Rosa to recover three hundred and seventy-one dollars and seventy cents, alleged to have been paid by the county to the sheriff for boarding prisoners … Tweed v.

Superior Oil Co. v. Superior Court

6 Cal. 2d 113 · California Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1936

(Los Angeles v. Superior Court, 185 Cal. 405, 414 [ 197 Pac. 79 ]; Bell v. Solomons, 162 Cal. 105 [ 121 Pac. 377 ].) … Rep. 205 ], State v. Bowen, 38 W. Va. 91 [ 18 S. E. 375 ]; People v. Canal Board, 55 N. Y. 390, 395 , State. v. Buttles’ Executor, 3 Ohio St. 309 , 319, 320, and State v. Kennedy, 60 Neb. 300 [ 83 N. W. 87 ].

Acosta v. County of Los Angeles

56 Cal. 2d 208 · California Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1961

Guidi v. Town of Great Barrington, 272 Mass. 577 [ 172 N.E. 916 ]; Le May v. Oconto, 229 Wis. 65 [ 281 N.W. 688 , 118 A.L.R. 1019 ]; Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., 219 La. 1045 [ 55 So.2d 239 ]; Collins v. … (Van Winkle v. City of King (1957), 149 Cal.App.2d 500, 504-505 [ 308 P.2d 512 ] ; Loewen v. City of Burbank (1954), 124 Cal.App.2d 551, 553 *214 [ 269 P.2d 121 ]; Betts v.

Coonan v. Loewenthal

129 Cal. 197 · California Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1900

(Board of Commrs. v. Younger, 29 Cal. 149 1 ; Mott v. Foster, 45 Cal. 72 ; Wylie v. Sierra Gold Co., 120 Cal. 486 ; Crescent Canal Co. v. Montgomery, 124 Cal. 135 .) … (See Smith v. Whittier, 95 Cal. 279 .)

Hurlburt v. Arthur

140 Cal. 103 · California Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1903

(Spreckels v. … (Cook on Stock and Stockholders, secs. 247, 253; 3 Thompson on Corporations, secs. 3192, 3194, 3213; Roosevelt v. Brown, 11 N. Y. 156 ; Davis v. Essex Baptist Soc., 44 Conn. 585 ; Sherwood v. Illinois Tr. and Sav.