Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscal

10,000+ results

1.17s

  • Girvin v. Simon

    116 Cal. 604 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1897

    A void contract does not become valid by failure to appeal to the board, of supervisors. (Burke v. Turney, 54 Cal. 486 ; Capron v. Hitchcock, 98 Cal. 430 ; Brock v. Luning, 89 Cal. 316 .) … (McVerry v. Boyd, 89 Cal. 304 ; Dyer v. Parrott, 60 Cal. 551 ; Bucknall v. Story, 46 Cal. 589 ; 13 Am. Rep. 220 ; Dorland v. McGlynn, 47 Cal. 47 ; Lent v. Tillson, 72 Cal. 404 ; Frick v. Morford, 87 Cal. 576 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hurlburt v. Arthur

    140 Cal. 103 · California Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1903

    (Spreckels v. … (Cook on Stock and Stockholders, secs. 247, 253; 3 Thompson on Corporations, secs. 3192, 3194, 3213; Roosevelt v. Brown, 11 N. Y. 156 ; Davis v. Essex Baptist Soc., 44 Conn. 585 ; Sherwood v. Illinois Tr. and Sav.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Fontana v. Pacific Can Co.

    129 Cal. 51 · California Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1900

    Plaintiffs cite in support of the ruling Pixley v. Western etc. R. R. Co., 33 Cal. 183 1 ; and Crowley v. Genesee etc. Co., 55 Cal. 273 . … (Barney v. Pforr, 117 Cal. 56 ; Pauly v. Pauly, 107 Cal. 8 2 ; Blood v. La Serena Land etc. Co., 113 Cal. 221 .)

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Winder v. Winder

    18 Cal. 2d 123 · California Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1941

    Cas. 1913A, 479] ; De Mattos v. McGovern, 25 Cal. App. (2d) 429 [ 77 Pac. (2d) 522 ] ; Burr v. Floyd, 137 Cal. App. [692] 696 [ 31 Pac. (2d) 402 ] ; Warder v. Hutchison, 69 Cal. App. 291 [ 231 Pac. 563 ] ; Mayhorne v. … (Long v. Rumsey, supra; Estate of Rohrer, supra; Friermuth v. Friermuth, 46 Cal. 42 ; C-iv. Code, sec. 210; Briggs v. Estate of Briggs, supra-, Ellis v. Gary, 74 Wis. 176 [ 42 N. W. 252 , 17 Am. St. Rep. 125 , 4 L. R.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re Critchlow

    11 Cal. 2d 751 · California Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1938

    (Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U. S. 547 [12 Sup. Ct. 195, 35 L. Ed. 1110 ]; Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591 [16 Sup. Ct. 644, 40 L. Ed. 819 ]; Ex parte Cohen, 104 Cal. 524 [ 38 Pac. 364 , 43 Am. St. Rep. 127 , 26 L. R. … (People v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Burum v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

    30 Cal. 2d 575 · California Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1947

    Van & Storage Co. v. … (Anderson v. Eaton, 211 Cal. 113, 117 [ 293 P. 788 ]. Cf. Lessing v. Gibbons, 6 Cal.App.2d 598 at 604 [ 45 P.2d 258 ].) In Anderson v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Heidt v. Minor

    89 Cal. 115 · California Supreme Court · May 18, 1891

    (Per Cooley, J., in Detroit Savings Bank v. Ziegler, 49 Mich. 157 ; 43 Am. Rep. 456 .) … (People v. Pennock, 60 N. Y. 421 .) In Welsh v. McVeagh, 2 Hailes, 876, John Syme, messenger, was intrusted by Welsh with letters of horning and caption against one of his debtors.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Gallik v. Superior Court

    5 Cal. 3d 855 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1971

    The officer nevertheless searched under the seat and brought out a brown leather bag. He opened it, and found inside a plastic “baggie" containing a small amount of marijuana. … Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 1 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 ], Camara v. Municipal Court (1967) 387 U.S. 523 [ 18 L.Ed.2d 930 , 87 S.Ct. 1727 ], People v.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • In Re Floyd

    43 Cal. 2d 379 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1954

    Proc., 1674-1676; see Smith v. Smith, supra, 125 Cal.App.2d 154, 168 .) … (Smith v. Smith, supra, 125 Cal.App.2d 154, 166 .)

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Linsk v. Linsk

    70 Cal. 2d 272 · California Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1969

    (Armstrong v. Brown (1936) 12 Cal.App.2d 22, 28 [ 54 P.2d 1118 ].) … In Smith v.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Turner v. Markham

    155 Cal. 562 · California Supreme Court · May 24, 1909

    [Eng.] 390; Langdon v. Fogg, 18 Fed. 5 ; Stewart v. St. Louis R. R. Co., 41 Fed. 736 ; Foster v. Seymour, 23 Fed. 65 .) … (Charter v. Sugar Refining Co., 19 Cal. 219 ; Smith v. Ferries & C. H. Ry. Co., (Cal.) 51 Pac. 710 ; Kellermain v. Maier, 116 Cal. 416 , [ 48 Pac. 377 ]; Scadden Flat G. M. Co. v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Eleazer v. Superior Court

    1 Cal. 3d 847 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1970

    The language of People v. … Rptr. 45 ]; People v. Brown (1968) 259 Cal. App.2d 663, 671 [ 66 Cal. Rptr. 623 ]; Harney and Cross, The Informer in Law Enforcement (2d ed. 1968) p. 73. [7] Compare Barber v.

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Newton v. Johnston Organ & Piano Manufacturing Co.

    180 Cal. 185 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1919

    (Dore v. Southern Pacific Co., 163 Cal. 182 , [ 124 Pac. 817 ]; Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co., Inc., 18 Cal. App. 242 , [ 123 Pac. 212 ]; Aigeltinger v. … (Seymour v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Harrington v. Taylor

    176 Cal. 802 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1917

    (See, also, Pomeroy's Equity Jurisprudence, sec. 867; Mack v. Shafer, 135 Cal. 114 , [ 67 P. 40 ].) … In 1880 Judge Harrison was a member of the Board of Freeholders to frame a charter for the city and county of San Francisco, and in 1886 he served as president of another similar board.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Moshonov v. Walsh

    94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 597 · California Supreme Court · Apr 17, 2000

    (Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1, 28 [ 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183 , 832 P.2d 899 ] (Moncharsh); Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. … Relying on DiMarco v.

    Cited 78 timesPublished
  • City of Santa Ana v. Gildmacher

    133 Cal. 395 · California Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1901

    It was held error, in Pasadena v. … In Weiderkind v. Tuolumne etc.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dwyer v. City Council of the City of Berkeley

    200 Cal. 505 · California Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1927

    (Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 [38 A. L. R 1479, 234 Pac. 381 ], and cases therein cited.) … In Chase v. Kalber, supra, Mr.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Eads v. Marks

    39 Cal. 2d 807 · California Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1952

    (Green v. Hanson, 103 Cal.App. 430 [284 *811 P. 1082]; Jones v. Kelly, 208 Cal. 251 [ 280 P. 942 ] ; Wetzel v. Pius, 78 Cal.App. 104 [ 248 P. 288 ].) … Board of Fire Underwriters, 29 Cal.2d 34, 41 [ 172 P.2d 867 ]), it is our opinion that the agreement between plaintiffs and defendant created a duty of care on the part of defendant toward plaintiffs’ minor child, that plaintiffs

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Wilson

    54 Cal. 2d 264 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1960

    (Plumer v. Superior Court, 50 Cal.2d 631, 637 [ 328 P.2d 193 ]; Krog v. Krog, 32 Cal.2d 812, 817 [ 198 P.2d 510 ]; Puckett v. Puckett, 21 Cal.2d 833, 843 [ 136 P.2d 1 ].) … (Brown v. National Electric Works, 168 Cal. 336 [ 143 P. 606 ] ; American-Hawaiian Eng. etc. Co. v. Butler, 165 Cal. 497, 516 [ 133 P. 280 , Ann.Cas. 1916C 44].)

    Cited 54 timesPublished
  • People v. Bowley

    59 Cal. 2d 855 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1963

    (People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184, 186 [ 187 P.2d 741 ]; People v. Tenner, 67 Cal.App.2d 360, 363 [ 154 P.2d 9 ] ; People v. Brown, 25 Cal.App.2d 513, 515 [ 77 P.2d 880 ]. Cf. People v. … In People v.

    Called into doubt on other grounds by People v. Tobias, 106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 80 (2001)Cited 82 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.