Case law

Murray v. Superior Court

129 Cal. 628 · California Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1900

Union v. … (Havemeyer v. Superior Court, supra; State etc. Co. v.

Grant v. McAuliffe

41 Cal. 2d 859 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1953

(Loranger v. … Greenberg, 110 N.J.L. 462, 464-466 [ 166 A. 119 ], and Rathgeber v. Sommerhalder, 112 N.J.L. 546, 548-549 [ 171 A. 835 ] ; Sumner v. Brown, 312 Pa. 124, 127 [ 167 A. 315 ].)

Stanislaus County Department of Social Services v. Deborah C.

6 Cal. 4th 386 · California Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1993

Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. … Dept, of Public Works v.

People v. Cullen

37 Cal. 2d 614 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1951

(People v. … (People v.

In re Wright

65 Cal. 2d 650 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1967

Brown (1958) 49 Cal.2d 577, 593 [ 320 P.2d 5 ]; In re Ponce, supra, ante, pp. 341, 342-343; In re Henry (1966) ante, pp. 330, 331-332 [ 54 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 420 P.2d 97 ] ; People v. … (Neal v.

People v. Jones

31 Cal. 565 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1867

Pro., Sec. 501, N. 2, second part; People v. Hennessey, 15 Wend. 148 ; State v. Stringfellow, 26 Miss. 157 ; Brown v. State, 32 Miss. 450 .) The following observations of the Court in Sam v. … In People v.

Ruggles v. Cannedy

46 L.R.A. 371 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1899

"Merrill v. Hurlburt, 63 Cal. 496 , and Brown v. Bank of *Page 305 Napa, 77 Cal. 544 , were both by the assignee in insolvency to set aside a sale of personal property for legal fraud. In both the action was upheld. … As is said in Brown v. Bank of Napa, supra: `The assignee has the right to sue for and recover everything due to the estate for the benefit of the creditors.'

People v. Romero and Self

62 Cal. 4th 1 · California Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2015

(See People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 448.) … (People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 391–392 [upholding instruction substantially similar to that given here] (Brown); see Victor v.

Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.

157 Cal. 333 · California Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1910

Hawkins had boarded the train at San Jose with intent to travel from there to Pajaro upon the said ticket. … (Ganea v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co., 51 Cal. 140 ; Hahn v. Schmidt, 64 Cal. 286 , [ 30 Pac. 818 ]; Diemer v. Herber, 75 Cal. 390 , [ 17 Pac. 205 ]; Holliday v. Holliday, 123 Cal. 32 , [ 55 Pac. 703 ].)

S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations

48 Cal. 3d 341 · California Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1989

McComb (1947) 331 U.S. 722, 727-730 [ 91 L.Ed. 1772, 1776-1778 , 67 S.Ct. 1473 ]; United States v. Silk (1947) 331 U.S. 704, 713-718 [ 91 L.Ed. 1757, 1767-1770 , 67 S.Ct. 1463 ]; Board v. … Appeal Board of Michigan Empl. Sec.

Moore v. Trott

156 Cal. 353 · California Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1909

Howlin v. Castro, 136 Cal. 605 , [ 69 Pac. 432 ], and Keyes v. Myers, 147 Cal. 705 , [ 82 Pac. 304 ], were cases of delivery in escrow. Such cases as Gaston v. … Such cases as Crocker v. Hall, 154 Cal. 527 , [ 98 Pac. 269 ], and Sprague v.

Bomberger v. McKelvey

35 Cal. 2d 607 · California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1950

(Marsh v. Blackman, (N. Y. Supreme Court), 50 Barb. 329 ; Fine Art Pictures Corp. v. Karzin, (Mo.App.) 29 S.W.2d 170 , 173; see Woodman v. … Boarding up the new building, however, would have rendered it unusable for an indefinite period.

Humphrey v. Appellate Division

127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 645 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2002

Opinion BROWN, J. … (See Franks v.

Fox v. City of Los Angeles

22 Cal. 3d 792 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1978

(Gordon v. Board of Education (1947) 78 Cal.App.2d 464, 472-473 [ 178 P.2d 488 ].) … (Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) 393 U.S. 97, 103-104 [ 21 L.Ed.2d 228, 234 , 89 S.Ct. 266 ]; accord Everson v. Board of Education (1947) 330 U.S. 1, 15 [ 91 L.Ed. 711, 723 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 168 A.L.R. 1392 ]; Zorach v.

People v. Gutierrez

35 Cal. 2d 721 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1950

(People v. Brown, 22 Cal.2d 752 [ 141 P.2d 1 ]; People v. Diaz, 26 Cal.2d 318 [158 P.2d 194 ]; People v. Lindley, 26 Cal.2d 780 [ 161 P.2d 227 ].) … (People v. Latona, 2 Cal.2d 714 [ 43 P.2d 260 ]; People v. Green, 13 Cal.2d 37 [ 87 P.2d 821 ]; People v. De La Roi, 36 Cal.App.2d 287 [ 97 P.2d 836 ].)

Sapp v. Barenfeld

34 Cal. 2d 515 · California Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1949

Church v. Seitz, 74 Cal. 287, 295 [ 15 P. 893 ]; Dore v. Southern Pac. Co., 163 Cal. 182, 189 [ 124 P. 817 ]; Simons v. Mills, 80 Cal. 118, 120 [ 22 P. 25 ]; Foster v. … (Gerdetz v. Central Oregon Irr. Co., 83 Ore. 576, 580 [ 163 P. 980 ]; Everett v. Brown, 120 Misc. 349 [ 198 N.Y.S. 462 , 465]; Koepke v. E. Liethen Grain Co., 205 Wis. 75, 80 [ 236 N.W. 544 ].)

State of California v. Allstate Ins. Co.

45 Cal. 4th 1008 · California Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2009

A state of emergency in Riverside County was declared by Governor Brown on February 5, and on February 15 President Carter declared the county a disaster area. … Co. v.

People v. Superior Court (Marks)

1 Cal. 4th 56 · California Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991

(Ginns v. Savage (1964) 61 Cal.2d 520, 524, fn. 2 [ 39 Cal.Rptr. 377 , 393 P.2d 689 ]; Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 734-735 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 ].) … Ball, supra, 163 U.S. at p. 668 [ 41 L.Ed. at p. 302 ] [prosecutor cannot “ ‘take advantage of his own wrong’ ”]; see also Brown v.

Thompson v. Pioche

44 Cal. 508 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

(Dutton v. Warschauer, 21 Cal. 628 ; Landers v. Bolton, 26 id. 419.) … We had ° occasion, in Fair v. Stevenot, 29 Cal. 488 , and Smith v. Yule, 31 Cal. 182 , to analyze the rule, and ascertain with precision its true scope and purpose.

In re Milton

13 Cal. 5th 893 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 2022

(See People v. … (Edwards v.