Case law

Fontana v. Pacific Can Co.

129 Cal. 51 · California Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1900

Plaintiffs cite in support of the ruling Pixley v. Western etc. R. R. Co., 33 Cal. 183 1 ; and Crowley v. Genesee etc. Co., 55 Cal. 273 . … (Barney v. Pforr, 117 Cal. 56 ; Pauly v. Pauly, 107 Cal. 8 2 ; Blood v. La Serena Land etc. Co., 113 Cal. 221 .)

Patterson v. Doe

130 Cal. 333 · California Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1900

This language was quoted with approval in Thomas v. … (See, also, Todd v. Board of Education, 122 Cal. 106 ; Lattin v. Gillette, 95 Cal. 317 1 ; Chipman v. Morrill, 20 Cal. 130 .)

Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.

157 Cal. 168 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1910

(Meigs v. Lister, 23 N. J. Eq. 201; Coker v. Birge, 9 Ga. 428 , [ 54 Am. Dec. 347 ]; Cleveland v. Citizens Gas Light Co., 20 N. J. Eq. 206; Bohan v. Port Jervis Gas Light Co., 122 N. Y. 23 , [ 25 N. E. 246 ]; Hayden v. … This court held in the Smith case that an ordinance passed by the board of supervisors of the county of Dos Angeles prohibiting the erection of gas plants in that locality was invalid as being unreasonable.

Story v. Richardson

186 Cal. 162 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1921

(San Francisco v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co., 166 Cal. 244, 247 , [ 135 Pac. 971 ]; Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. … Co. v. Eshleman, 167 Cal. 666, 680 , [ 140 Pac. 591, 596 ].)

Ex parte Haskell

112 Cal. 412 · California Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1896

In Warren Borough v. Geer, 117 Pa. … Louis v. Wehrung, 46 Ill. 394 ; St. Louis v. Sternberg, 69 Mo. 301 ; Machine Co. v. Gage, 100 U. S. 679 .) There is nothing in Ex parte Frank, 52 Cal. 606 , 28 Am. Rep. 642 , necessarily opposed to this view.

Burum v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

30 Cal. 2d 575 · California Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1947

Van & Storage Co. v. … (Anderson v. Eaton, 211 Cal. 113, 117 [ 293 P. 788 ]. Cf. Lessing v. Gibbons, 6 Cal.App.2d 598 at 604 [ 45 P.2d 258 ].) In Anderson v.

Marshall v. Taylor

98 Cal. 55 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1893

(Furman v. Applegate, 23 N. J. L. 28; Kennedy v. Shea, 110 Mass. 147 ; White v. Murtland, 71 Ill. 250 .) … (State v, Bierce, 27 Conn. 319 ; Croghan v. State, 22 Wis. 444 ; Brown v. Kingsley, 38 Iowa, 222 .) Modern lexicographers define seduction as the act of persuading a woman to surrender her chastity.

Mondine v. Sarlin

11 Cal. 2d 593 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1938

Mondine then stepped on the running board of his truck in a position where he could see the amount of gasoline flowing into it. … (Hoff v. Los Angeles Pac.

Ephraim v. Pacific Bank

129 Cal. 589 · California Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1900

In Tome v. … (Hutchinson v. Hampton, 1 Mont. 39 .) In Cutter v. Pollock, 7 N.

People v. Neal

1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 650 · California Supreme Court · Jul 14, 2003

(See, e.g., Brown v. Mississippi (1936) 297 U.S. 278, 285-286 [ 80 L.Ed. 682 , 56 S.Ct. 461 ].) In Miranda v. … Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., Moreno, J., concurred. In Chavez v.

Grant v. McAuliffe

41 Cal. 2d 859 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1953

(Loranger v. … Greenberg, 110 N.J.L. 462, 464-466 [ 166 A. 119 ], and Rathgeber v. Sommerhalder, 112 N.J.L. 546, 548-549 [ 171 A. 835 ] ; Sumner v. Brown, 312 Pa. 124, 127 [ 167 A. 315 ].)

Chase v. Superior Court

154 Cal. 789 · California Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1908

“In Hatch v. … “In Brown v.

People v. Prettyman

14 Cal. 4th 248 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1996

She then saw two Hispanic men and one White male with long scraggly light-brown hair run down the alley next to the church. The defense also presented expert testimony. … Justice Brown’s concurrence and dissent asserts that our “new instructional requirements” will “vex trial judges and perplex juries.” (Cone, and dis. opn. of Brown, J., post, at p. 292.)

In re Wright

65 Cal. 2d 650 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1967

Brown (1958) 49 Cal.2d 577, 593 [ 320 P.2d 5 ]; In re Ponce, supra, ante, pp. 341, 342-343; In re Henry (1966) ante, pp. 330, 331-332 [ 54 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 420 P.2d 97 ] ; People v. … (Neal v.

Goldin v. Public Utilities Commission

23 Cal. 3d 638 · California Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1979

State Board of Education (1969) 1 Cal.3d 214, 220-233 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 175 , 461 P.2d 375 ]; Hall v. Bureau of Employment Agencies (1976) 64 Cal.App.3d 482, 490-495 [ 138 Cal.Rptr. 725 ]; Goldberg v. … (Patty v. Board of Medical Examiners (1973) 9 Cal.3d 356, 364 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 473 , 508 P.2d 1121 , 61 A.L.R.3d 342 ]; see also Redner v. Workmen’s Comp.

Neary v. Regents of University of California

3 Cal. 4th 273 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1992

Inc. v. Chester’s Market Inc., supra, 756 F.2d at p. 282 , citing New Left Ed. Proj. v. Board of Reg. of the U. of Tex. Sys. (5th Cir. 1973) 472 F.2d 218 , vacated 414 U.S. 807 [ 38 L.Ed.2d 43 , 94 S.Ct. 118 ].) … (Fenske v. Board of Administration (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 590, 596 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 182 ]; 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Appeal, § 763, p. 730.)

Nulty v. Price

202 Cal. 279 · California Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1927

(See Womack v. Walling, 1 Baxt. (60 Tenn.) 425; 8 C. J. 132.) We think the obligation was one to pay $2,000 in money. … now deceased, wherein it was alleged that since the submission of the cause the defendant had discovered that three checks, two in the sum of $4.70 and the third in the sum of $267.70, had been made in his favor by the board

Newton v. Johnston Organ & Piano Manufacturing Co.

180 Cal. 185 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1919

(Dore v. Southern Pacific Co., 163 Cal. 182 , [ 124 Pac. 817 ]; Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co., Inc., 18 Cal. App. 242 , [ 123 Pac. 212 ]; Aigeltinger v. … (Seymour v.

McShane v. Carter

80 Cal. 310 · California Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1889

These deeds were authorized by the boards of directors of said respective companies, and were executed by the proper officers, but were not ratified by the stockholders of said corporations. … (Perrin v. Garfield, 37 Vt. 312 ; Morgan v. Mason, 20 Ohio, 401; 55 Am. Dec. 464 ; New Ipswich Factory v. Batchelder, 3 N. H. 190; 14 Am. Dec. 346 ; Neaderhouser v. State, 28 Ind. 257 ; Whitney v.

California State Automobile Ass'n. Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Superior Court

50 Cal. 3d 658 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1990

(McCreery v. Fuller (1883) 63 Cal. 30, 31-32 ; see also Moore v. Schneider (1925) 196 Cal. 380, 389 [ 238 P. 81 ]; Partridge v. Shepard (1886) 71 Cal. 470, 475 [ 12 P. 480 ]; Wittman v. … Co. v. Johansen (1969) 270 Cal.App.2d 824, 833 [ 76 Cal.Rptr. 174 ]; Guaranty L. Corp. v. Board of Supers. (1937) 22 Cal.App.2d 684, 686 [ 71 P.2d 931 ]; 7 Witkin, Cal.