Case law

California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Payne

31 Cal. 2d 210 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1947

(Board of Soc. Welfare v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.2d 90, 97 [ 162 P.2d 635 ]; Stockton Sav. & Loan Bank v. … (See Robert v. Police Court, 148 Cal. 131 [ 82 P. 838 ]; Bacon Service Corp v. Huss, 199 Cal. 21 [ 248 P. 235 ].)

Langford v. Superior Court

43 Cal. 3d 21 · California Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1987

Proc., § 1086; see Robbins v. … (IT Corp. v. County of Imperial (1983) 35 Cal.3d 63, 69-70 [ 196 Cal.Rptr. 715 , 672 P.2d 121 ]; accord, Cohen v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 40 Cal.3d 277, 286 [ 219 Cal.Rptr. 467 , 707 P.2d 840 ].)

In Re Phyle

30 Cal. 2d 838 · California Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1947

People v. … For this purpose, the Legislature may delegate the government, charge and superintendence of such institutions to any public governmental agency or agencies, officers, or board or boards, whether now existing or hereafter

Globe Indemnity Co. v. Hanify

217 Cal. 721 · California Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1933

For your records I am enclosing a copy of the assignment made to the First National Bank, the original of which assignment will be filed with the Board of Trustees of the Clarksburg High School District.” … payment was made; nor is it attempting to recover from the sureties moneys loaned the contractor, under the guise of furnishing labor and material used in the construction of the work, *729 as was the fact in Cadenasso v.

Howard v. Babcock

6 Cal. 4th 409 · California Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1993

(Haight, Brown & Bonesteel v. Superior Court (1991) 234 Cal.App.3d 963, 969 [ 285 Cal.Rptr. 845 ] [hereafter Haight].) … (Penasack, Abandoning the Per Se Rule Against Law Firm Agreements Anticipating Competition: Comment on Haight, Brown & Bonesteel v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (1992) 5 Geo. J.

Estate of Mason

62 Cal. 2d 213 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1965

(See Lewis v. Hill, 387 Ill. 542 [ 56 N.E.2d 619 ]; In re Estate of Bierstedt, 254 *217 Iowa 772 [ 119 N.W.2d 234 ]; Walsh v. Gillespie, 338 Mass. 278 [ 154 N.E.2d 906 ]; Morse v. … State Board of Equalization, 58 Cal.2d 252, 256 [ 23 Cal. Rptr. 589 , 373 P.2d 637 ]; see also Model Probate Code, § 231 (Simes 1946).)

People v. Williams

56 Cal. 4th 165 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2013

.‖ (Uttecht v. Brown, supra, 551 U.S. at p. 7.) Defendant, however, contends we may not infer a finding of bias here because the court expressly found that the challenge to W.M. lacked merit. We disagree. … (See People v. Gomez (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 609, 630; U.S. v. Brown (8th Cir. 1996) 101 F.3d 1272, 1274; Presley v. City of Benbrook (5th Cir.1993) 4 F.3d 405, 408, fn. 2.)

Stromer v. Browning

65 Cal. 2d 421 · California Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1966

In Coulter v. … In Cochran v.

County of Santa Clara v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA CNTY.

50 Cal. 4th 35 · California Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2010

Dept. of Corporations v. SpeeDee Oil Change Systems (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1135, 1145 [ 86 Cal.Rptr.2d 816 , 980 P.2d 371 ]; Comden v. … Plaintiff City and County of San Francisco’s contingent fee agreement, for example, has been public knowledge since 2001, when the board of supervisors authorized the city attorney to enter into it. (S.F. Res.

People v. Bidleman

104 Cal. 608 · California Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1894

(Spottiswood v. … (People v. Lane, 100 Cal. 379 ; People v. Walters, 98 Cal. 138 .)

Popejoy v. Hannon

37 Cal. 2d 159 · California Supreme Court · May 11, 1951

Supplementing this testimony there was evidence to the effect that smooth boards tend to slide more easily than rough lumber. … (Oettinger v.

West v. City of San Diego

54 Cal. 2d 469 · California Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1960

(Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 183 F.2d 811 [overruled on another point in Smither & Co., Inc. v. Coles, 242 F.2d 220 ]; Cooney v. Moo-maw, 109 F.Supp. 448; Missouri Pacific Transp. Co. v. … .]; Brown v. Georgia-Tennessee Coaches, 88 Ga.App. 519 [ 77 S.E.2d 24 ] ; Acuff v. Schmit, 248 Iowa 272 [ 78 N.W.2d 480 ] ; Montgomery v. Stephan, 359 Mich. 33 [ 101 N.W.2d 227 ].)

De La Beckwith v. Superior Court

146 Cal. 496 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1905

In Lawrence v. … In Richman v.

People v. Mendoza

68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 274 · California Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2007

(Tuilaepa v. California (1994) 512 U.S. 967, 976 [ 129 L.Ed.2d 750 , 114 S.Ct. 2630 ]; People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 401 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ].) … (People v. Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 402 ; Tuilaepa v. California, supra, 512 U.S. at p. 979 .)

People v. Goldsworthy

130 Cal. 600 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1900

In People v. … In People v. Burns, 63 Cal. 614 , a ease identical in principle with that at bar, it was held that the information was sufficient. In People v.

H. G. Bittleston Law & Collection Agency v. Howard

172 Cal. 357 · California Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1916

But the complaint contains no allegation based on information and belief, and therefore the averment must be treated as mere surplusage. ( Lassen v. Board of Dental Examiners, 24 Cal.App. 767 , [ 142 P. 505 ].) … In Newman v.

Kearney Investment Co. v. Golden Gate Ferry Co.

198 Cal. 560 · California Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1926

(Tewksbury v. Magraff, 33 Cal. 237, 245 ; see, also, Gray v. Whitla, 70 Okl. 288 [2 A. L. R 356, and note, 174 Pac. 239 ].) … Section 2524 of the Political Code transfers the possession and control of certain state property, of which the property in question is a part, to the Board of Harbor Commissioners.

Waters v. Bourhis

40 Cal. 3d 424 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1985

(See, e.g., Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 931, 949 [ 123 Cal.Rptr. 563 ].)

City of Los Angeles v. Pomeroy

125 Cal. 420 · California Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1899

(See McDonald v. McCoy, 121 Cal. 55 , and authorities cited at 66, 67; Hartley v. … Brown, 46 Cal. 202 , and authorities there cited.) *427 The title of the city to the easement claimed, therefore, wholly fails, and for this reason the order and judgment of the superior court must he reversed.

Garrison v. Rourke

32 Cal. 2d 430 · California Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1948

(Minges v. Board of Trustees, 27 Cal.App. 15, 16-17 [ 148 P. 816 ].) The trial court’s ruling on these votes was therefore correct. (Russell v. McDowell, 83 Cal. 70 [ 23 P. 183 ]; Bush v. … In Norwood v.