Case law

People v. Williams

56 Cal. 4th 165 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2013

.‖ (Uttecht v. Brown, supra, 551 U.S. at p. 7.) Defendant, however, contends we may not infer a finding of bias here because the court expressly found that the challenge to W.M. lacked merit. We disagree. … (See People v. Gomez (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 609, 630; U.S. v. Brown (8th Cir. 1996) 101 F.3d 1272, 1274; Presley v. City of Benbrook (5th Cir.1993) 4 F.3d 405, 408, fn. 2.)

City of Long Beach v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

44 Cal. 2d 599 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1955

In City of Oakland v. … For example, the following uses for a railroad right of way have been held to be proper since they contribute to the railroad’s business: a sawmill, lumber shed, store or boarding house (Grand Trunk R.R. v.

Stromer v. Browning

65 Cal. 2d 421 · California Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1966

In Coulter v. … In Cochran v.

County of Santa Clara v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA CNTY.

50 Cal. 4th 35 · California Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2010

Dept. of Corporations v. SpeeDee Oil Change Systems (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1135, 1145 [ 86 Cal.Rptr.2d 816 , 980 P.2d 371 ]; Comden v. … Plaintiff City and County of San Francisco’s contingent fee agreement, for example, has been public knowledge since 2001, when the board of supervisors authorized the city attorney to enter into it. (S.F. Res.

West v. City of San Diego

54 Cal. 2d 469 · California Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1960

(Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 183 F.2d 811 [overruled on another point in Smither & Co., Inc. v. Coles, 242 F.2d 220 ]; Cooney v. Moo-maw, 109 F.Supp. 448; Missouri Pacific Transp. Co. v. … .]; Brown v. Georgia-Tennessee Coaches, 88 Ga.App. 519 [ 77 S.E.2d 24 ] ; Acuff v. Schmit, 248 Iowa 272 [ 78 N.W.2d 480 ] ; Montgomery v. Stephan, 359 Mich. 33 [ 101 N.W.2d 227 ].)

H. G. Bittleston Law & Collection Agency v. Howard

172 Cal. 357 · California Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1916

But the complaint contains no allegation based on information and belief, and therefore the averment must be treated as mere surplusage. ( Lassen v. Board of Dental Examiners, 24 Cal.App. 767 , [ 142 P. 505 ].) … In Newman v.

De La Beckwith v. Superior Court

146 Cal. 496 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1905

In Lawrence v. … In Richman v.

People v. Bostick

62 Cal. 2d 820 · California Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1965

In Escobedo v. … In People v.

People v. Mendoza

68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 274 · California Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2007

(Tuilaepa v. California (1994) 512 U.S. 967, 976 [ 129 L.Ed.2d 750 , 114 S.Ct. 2630 ]; People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 401 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ].) … (People v. Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 402 ; Tuilaepa v. California, supra, 512 U.S. at p. 979 .)

People v. Goldsworthy

130 Cal. 600 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1900

In People v. … In People v. Burns, 63 Cal. 614 , a ease identical in principle with that at bar, it was held that the information was sufficient. In People v.

Popejoy v. Hannon

37 Cal. 2d 159 · California Supreme Court · May 11, 1951

Supplementing this testimony there was evidence to the effect that smooth boards tend to slide more easily than rough lumber. … (Oettinger v.

Pottage v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., Inc.

206 Cal. 622 · California Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1929

On January 21, 1924, plaintiff, a hatch-tender employed by the above-named respondent Stevedore Company, but not *624 in the employ of the above-named respondent Steamship Company, while working on board the steamship “Edgar … The contention that the two defendants, having different rules of law applicable to them, could not be properly joined as defendants (Schotis v.

Kearney Investment Co. v. Golden Gate Ferry Co.

198 Cal. 560 · California Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1926

(Tewksbury v. Magraff, 33 Cal. 237, 245 ; see, also, Gray v. Whitla, 70 Okl. 288 [2 A. L. R 356, and note, 174 Pac. 239 ].) … Section 2524 of the Political Code transfers the possession and control of certain state property, of which the property in question is a part, to the Board of Harbor Commissioners.

Waters v. Bourhis

40 Cal. 3d 424 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1985

(See, e.g., Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners (1975) 49 Cal.App.3d 931, 949 [ 123 Cal.Rptr. 563 ].)

Southern Pacific Co. v. Robinson

132 Cal. 408 · California Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1901

In Weinstock, Lubin & Co. v. … In the case of Meyers v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 41 N. Y.

City of Los Angeles v. Pomeroy

125 Cal. 420 · California Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1899

(See McDonald v. McCoy, 121 Cal. 55 , and authorities cited at 66, 67; Hartley v. … Brown, 46 Cal. 202 , and authorities there cited.) *427 The title of the city to the easement claimed, therefore, wholly fails, and for this reason the order and judgment of the superior court must he reversed.

Garrison v. Rourke

32 Cal. 2d 430 · California Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1948

(Minges v. Board of Trustees, 27 Cal.App. 15, 16-17 [ 148 P. 816 ].) The trial court’s ruling on these votes was therefore correct. (Russell v. McDowell, 83 Cal. 70 [ 23 P. 183 ]; Bush v. … In Norwood v.

Ephraim v. Pacific Bank

129 Cal. 589 · California Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1900

In Tome v. … (Hutchinson v. Hampton, 1 Mont. 39 .) In Cutter v. Pollock, 7 N.

McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society

70 Cal. 163 · California Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1886

under the laws of the state, and exercise such powers under the said corporate name, having its principal place of business in the city of San Francisco; and that there was then chosen by ballot seven persons to act as a board … Co. v. Woodbury, 14 Cal. 425 ; S. C., 73 Am. Dec. 658 ; Harris v. McGregor, 29 Cal. 127 ; People v. Selfridge, 52 Cal. 331 .)

People v. Wells

145 Cal. 138 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1904

Northfield, where the said McCartney was boarding, and McCartney in giving his testimony says: “I was standing at the northwest corner of the porch, and we were talking, and all of a sudden Mr. … (People v. Fitzgerald, 138 Cal. 40 ; People v. Gonzales, 143 Cal. 605 ; People v. Donnolly, 143 Cal. 394 ; People v. Smith, 143 Cal. 597 .)