Case law

Salgado v. County of Los Angeles

80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 46 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1999

Hrimnak v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Pigeon Point Ranch, Inc. v. Perot

59 Cal. 2d 227 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1963

(George v. Bekins Van Storage Co., 33 Cal.2d 834, 850-851 [ 205 P.2d 1037 ]; Easton v. Ash, 18 Cal.2d 530, 539 [ 116 P.2d 433 ]; Tyrrell v. Baldwin, 78 Cal. 470, 471-472 [ 21 P. 116 ]; White v. … (DiGenova v. State Board of Education, 57 Cal.2d 167, 178-180 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ] ; Vangel v. Vangel, 45 Cal.2d 804, 809-810 [ 291 P.2d 25 , 55 A.L.R.2d 1385 ] ; Tomaier v.

People v. Foster

251 Cal. Rptr. 3d 312 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 2019

People v. … In People v.

People v. Mayberry

15 Cal. 3d 143 · California Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1975

In People v. … Brown, 22 Cal.2d 752, 756-758 [ 141 P.2d 1 ], However, the instant instruction, unlike the instruction in Brown , is peculiarly applicable to a defendant.

Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.

190 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1922

Hercules Powder Co., 39 Cal.App. 223 [ 178 P. 531 ]; Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 39 Cal.App. 738 [ 179 P. 697 ]; Maupin v. Solomon, 41 Cal.App. 323 [ 183 P. 198 ]. … In the case of Albert v.

People v. Hernandez

134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 602 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 2003

(People v. Brown (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322, 335-336 [ 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 862 P.2d 710 ]; see also People v. Barrera (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 541, 547-552 [ 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 755 ].) … Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 581 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ].)

Union Savings Bank of San Jose v. Dunlap

135 Cal. 628 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1902

In Argues v. … (Argues v. Union Savings Bank, 133 Cal. 139 .) We find nothing in Bank of National City v.

People v. Bush

68 Cal. 623 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1886

State, 2 Ohio St. 296 ; Oancemi v. People, 18 N. Y. 128 ; Wilson v. State, 16 Ark. 601 ; Bond v. State, 17 Ark. 290 ; Brown v. State, 16 Ind. 496 .” In the case of State v. Berlin et al., 24 La. … (Sneed v. State, 5 Ark. 432 ; S. C., 41 Am. Dec. 102 ; Cole v. State, 10 Ark. 578 ; Sweeden v. State, 19 Ark. 209 .)

Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co. v. Sierra Valleys Ry.

158 Cal. 690 · California Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1910

(Short on Law of Railway Bonds, sec. 75 ; Jones on Corporation Bonds and Mortgages, sec. 267 ; Amy v. Dubuque, 98 U. S. 470 ; Clark v. Iowa City, 20 Wall. 585 ; Koshkonong v. Burton, 104 U. S. 668 ; Nash v. … (Brown v. Martin, 25 Cal. 82 ; Bliss v. Sneath, 119 Cal. 526 , [ 51 Pac. 848 ].)

Sanguinetti v. Sanguinetti

9 Cal. 2d 95 · California Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1937

(People v. Hill, 2 Cal. App. (2d) 141-147 [ 37 Pac. (2d) 849 ].). It does not apply where the period is measured in days. (Helphenstine v. Vincennes Nat. Bank, 65 Ind. 582 [ 32 Am. Rep. 86 ]; Brown v. … (Figoni v. Figoni, supra; Schneider v. Schneider, supra; Coats v. Coats, 160 Cal. 671 [ 118 Pac. 441 , 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 844] ; Macchi v. La Rocca, 54 Cal. App. 98 [ 201 Pac. 143 ]; Buckley v.

People v. Christian S.

7 Cal. 4th 768 · California Supreme Court · May 16, 1994

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 724 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 ].) We *775 must begin with the words of the statute. (Ibid.) … (Brown v. Poway Unified School Dist. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 820, 830 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 679 , 843 P.2d 624 ].) That history, though not unequivocal, leads to the same conclusion.

People v. Daveggio & Michaud

231 Cal. Rptr. 3d 646 · California Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2018

After the last witness testified, but before closing argument, the prosecution sought the admission of the same poster board. … (See People v. Romero and Self (2015) 62 Cal.4th 1, 42 & fn. 15; see also People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 391–392 & fn. 2; Victor, supra, 511 U.S. at pp. 7–17; People v.

In Re Estate of Gregory

133 Cal. 131 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1901

They are: Strode v. Russell, 2 Vern. 620 (1708); Jackson v. Kniffen, 2 Johns. 31 1 (1806); Provis v. Reed, 5 Bing. 435 (1829); Shailer v. Bumstead, 99 Mass. 112 ; Stevens v. Vancleve, 4 Wash. C. C. 262 ; Robinson v. … Contestants rely upon Throckmorton v. Holt, 12 App. D. C. 552, and cases cited; also, Johnson v. Brown, 51 Tex. 65 ; Hoppe v. Byers, 60 Md. 381 ; Colvin v. Warfold, 20 Md. 367 ; Neel v. Satton, 40 Pa. St. 483; Boylan v.

Porter v. Elizalde

125 Cal. 204 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1899

In Price v. … Similar rulings have been made in Holmes v. Board of Trade, 81 Mo. 137 ; Young v. Crawford, supra; Savings Bank v. Benton, 2 Met. (Ky.) 240; Evans v. Mohr, 153 Ill. 561 ; Ennis v. Hultz, 46 Iowa, 76 .

Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning Commission

34 Cal. 3d 412 · California Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1983

(Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of Supervisors (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 1, 5 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 431 ]; accord, United California Bank v. Bottler (1971) 16 Cal.App.3d 610, 616 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 227 ].) … concerning any decision of the advisory agency or appeal board.”

Burke v. Maguire

154 Cal. 456 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1908

(Moore v. Steele, 149 Cal. 304 , [ 86 Pac. 693 ]; Morrow v. Barker, 119 Cal. 67 , [ 51 Pac. 12 ]; Humboldt Soc. v. Burnham, 111 Cal. 345 , [ 43 Pac. 971 ]; McGrath v. … (Ellison v. Halleck, 6 Cal. 393 ; Williamson v. Blattan, 9 Cal. 501 .) Afterwards, in Brown v. Martin, 25 Cal. 91 , an exception to this rule was made in eases where the bar!

City of L.A. v. Cohn

101 Cal. 373 · California Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1894

This report was ordered received and placed on file, and a full synopsis thereof was entered upon the minutes of the board. … In the later case of Simplot v. Chicago etc. By. Co., 16 Fed.

Berry v. Berry

145 Cal. 784 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1905

(Hatton v. Hatton, 136 Cal. 353 .) … (Deyoe v.

Ex parte Kirby

76 Cal. 514 · California Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1888

“And I further certify that during the said imprisonment of the said Kirby his conduct has been such as to entitle him, under the provisions of section 1590 of the Penal Code, and under the rules adopted by the state board … "People, plaintiff, v. James Kirby, defendant. Ho. 201. “ How comes the district attorney with the said defendant to the bar of this court for arraignment.

People v. Williams

61 Cal. 4th 1244 · California Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2015

Rahin Brown was defendant‘s neighbor and friend in 1987. They played basketball and football together. Brown left home, joined the Navy, and went to college. … Brown was unaware of any bad behavior on defendant‘s part. In spite of defendant‘s convictions, Brown remained his friend and believed he had good qualities.