Case law

City of Alameda v. Cohen

133 Cal. 5 · California Supreme Court · May 22, 1901

(Monterey County v. Cushing, 83 Cal. 510 ; San Diego Land etc. Co. v. Neale, 88 Cal. 55 .) … (Los Angeles v. Leavis, 119 Cal. 165 ; Santa Cruz v. Enright, 95 Cal. 105 .)

Woodruff v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.

87 Cal. 275 · California Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1890

Baldwin, of the city and- county of San Bernardino, state of California, the parties of the second part, witnesseth,— “That said party of the first part, in pursuance of a resolution of the board of directors of said corporation … There is no doubt, however, that time was of the essence of this contract, as is seen by a reference to the opinions delivered in Grey v. Tubbs, 43 Cal. 364 , and Cleary v.

Revert v. Hesse

184 Cal. 295 · California Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1920

(Estate of Keating, 158 Cal. 109 , [ 110 Pac. 109 ]; Fiske v. Gosbey, 168 Cal. 334 , [ 143 Pac. 611 ]; Brown v. … (Herron v. Hughes, 25 Cal. 555 ; Davitt v. Bakers’ Union, 124 Cal. 99 , [ 56 Pac. 775 ]; Dowdell v. Carpy, 129 Cal. 168 , [ 61 Pac. 948 ]; Menner v.

County of San Mateo v. Boss

3 Cal. 3d 962 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1971

State Board of Social Welfare (1947) 82 Cal.App.2d 627 [ 186 P.2d 429 ]; Garcia v. Superior Court (1941) 45 Cal.App.2d 31 [ 113 P.2d 470 ]; County of Los Angeles v. … Seemingly to the contrary are Garcia v. Superior Court (1941) 45 Cal.App.2d 31 [ 113 P.2d 470 ], and Kelley v. State Board of Social Welfare (1947) 82 Cal.App.2d 627 [186 P.2d *970 429].

Evans v. City of Berkeley

40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 205 · California Supreme Court · Mar 9, 2006

(Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters (1946) 29 Cal.2d 34, 42 [ 172 P.2d 867 ].)” (Blank v. … (See DeRose v. Carswell (1987) 196 Cal.App.3d 1011, 1018-1019 [ 242 Cal.Rptr. 368 ] [concessions of the plaintiff’s attorney before trial court negate contrary allegations for purposes of demurrer]; cf. Browne v.

Carraher v. S.F. Bridge Co.

100 Cal. 177 · California Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1893

(Carraher v. San Francisco Bridge Co., 81 Cal. 98 .) … On principle, I think this case cannot be distinguished from that of Strong v. Sacramento etc. R. R.

Futterer v. City of Sacramento

196 Cal. 248 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1925

Such was the case of California Academy of Sciences v. … (Mass.) 71; and also citing the case of French v.

Commonwealth Acceptance Corp. v. Jordan

198 Cal. 618 · California Supreme Court · May 21, 1926

property, the board of directors of said corporation having power under the laws of New Hampshire to adopt and carry into effect such order. … Co. v.

In Re Bush

6 Cal. 2d 43 · California Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1936

Railroad Com., 197 Cal. 627 [ 242 Pac. 486 ]; Haynes v. MacFarlane, 207 Cal. 529 [ 279 Pac. 436 ]; Forsyth v. San *52 Joaquin Light etc. Corp., 208 Cal. 397 [ 281 Pac. 620 ] ; Landis v. … Co. v. Superior Court, 211 Cal. 411 [ 295 Pac. 837 ] ; Alward v. Johnson, 208 Cal. 359 [ 281 Pac. 389 ] ; People v. Duntley, 217 Cal. 150 [ 17 Pac. (2d) 715 ] ; People v. Lang Transp.

Warner v. State Bar

34 Cal. 3d 36 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1983

State Bar, supra, 30 Cal.3d at page 916 , “our established rule is that while the hearing panel’s factual findings may be entitled to a greater deference than the board’s own findings, ‘it is the Board’s recommendation in … (Bushman v.

Wiley v. County of San Diego

79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 672 · California Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1998

*534 Opinion BROWN, J. When a former criminal defendant sues for legal malpractice, is actual innocence a necessary element of the cause of action? For reasons of policy and pragmatism, we conclude the answer is yes. … Brown (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 537, 554 [ 223 Cal.Rptr. 66 ] [same: inadequately pursuing or perfecting plea negotiations]; People v.

Bates v. Babcock

16 L.R.A. 745 · California Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1892

(Bruce v. Hastings, 41 Vt 380; 98 Am. Dec. 592 ; Benjamin v. Zell, 100 Pa. 33 ; Trowbridge v. Wetherbee, 11 Allen, 361 ; Babcock v. Read, 99 N. Y. 609 ; Coward v. … In Forster v.

Bernkrant v. Fowler

55 Cal. 2d 588 · California Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1961

(Schweider v. Lang, 29 Minn. 254 [ 13 N.W. 33, 34 , 43 Am. Rep. 202 ]; Givens v. Featherstone, (Tex.Civ.App.) 12 S.W.2d 613, 614 ]; Riley v. Atherton, 185 Ark. 425 [ 47 S.W.2d 568 ]; Brown v. … Bank v. Gallagher, 119 Minn. 463 [ 138 N.W. 681, 682 , Ann.Cas. 1914B 120]; Runyan v. Mersereau, 11 Johns. *594 (N.Y.) 534, 538; Ackla v. Ackla, 6 Pa. 228, 230 ; McKenzie v.

Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. Superior Court

217 Cal. 517 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1933

full amount paid upon the stock or investment certificate surrendered . . . ; but not more than one-half of the monthly receipts in any one month must be applied to withdrawals for that month, without the consent of the board … The cases of Hiroshima v. Bank of Italy, 78 Cal. App. 362 [ 248 Pac. 947 ], and Grisinger v. Golden State Bank, 92 Cal.

Kalt v. Youngworth

16 Cal. 2d 807 · California Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1940

(Tiffany, Real Property, 3d ed., sec. 1055, p. 253; Brown, Personal Property, sec. 50; Bogert, Trusts and Trustees, sec. 150, p. 447.) … Ed. 504 ]; Devol v. Dye, 123 Ind. 321 [ 24 N. E. 246 , 7 L. R. A. 439] ; Minot v. Tilton, 64 N. H. 371 [ 10 Atl. 682 ]; Gulick v. Gulick, 39 N. J. Eq. 401; Myrover v. French, 73 *814 N. C. 609; Read v.

People v. Shelton

60 Cal. 2d 740 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1964

(People v. King, ante, pp. 308, 311 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 825 , 384 P.2d 153 ]; People v. Haven, 59 Cal.2d 713, 719 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 47 , 381 P.2d 927]; Castaneda v. … (People v. Haven, 59 Cal.2d 713, 718 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 47 , 381 P.2d 927 ]; Tompkins v. Superior Court, 59 Cal.2d 65, 68 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 889 , 378 P.2d 113]; People v. Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640, 643-645 [ 290 P.2d 528 ].)

People v. Latham

52 Cal. 598 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1878

This tax was declared void and uncollectible by the decision of this Court in Houghton v. … Sec. 4 of said act (see Statutes 1873-4, p. 746) provides that the “ assessment books of the various counties in this State for each of said years, as delivered by the Clerks of the Boards of Supervisors to the Auditors,

Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.

150 Cal. 535 · California Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1907

(Tucker v. McBean, 65 Me. 352 ; Smith v. Sackett, 10 Ill. 534 ; Chandler v. McKinne, 6 Mich. 217 , [ 74 Am. Dec. 686 ].) … The supreme court of the United States substantially alone has denied the power in Railroad Co. v. Botsford, 141 U. S. 250 , [11 Sup. Ct. 1000], In Brown v. Chicago etc. Ry. Co., 12 N. Dak. 61, [ 102 Am. St.

Davis v. Fresno Unified School Dist.

California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2023

(See Kaatz v. … of cheating, the hiring of various principals and school administrators, and the cancer illness of a board member.

Morris v. Municipal Court

32 Cal. 3d 553 · California Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1982

While Crownover was pending before us, the United States Supreme Court upheld the regulations on nude entertainment promulgated by the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. (California v. … (See Saxe v. Brennan (E.D.Wis. 1976) 416 F.Supp. 892, 894-895 , affd. (7th Cir. 1976) 544 F.2d 521 ; Attwood v. Purcell (D.Ariz. 1975) 402 F.Supp. 231, 236 ; Koppinger v.