Case law

Reed v. Norman

41 Cal. 2d 17 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1953

Kent, 219 Cal. 231 [ 35 P.2d 977 ] ; People v. Stewart, 115 Cal.App. 681 [ 2 P.2d 195 ]), for personal property (Mannion v. Baldwin, supra, [partnership interest] ; Herkner v. … (See Hogan v. Ingold, 38 Cal.2d 802 [ 243 P.2d 1 ] ; Anderson v. Derrick, 220 Cal. 770, 773-774 [ 32 P.2d 1078 ] ; Whitten v. Dabney, 171 Cal. 621, 624 [ 154 P. 312 ] ; Shenberg v.

Eistrat v. Cekada

50 Cal. 2d 289 · California Supreme Court · May 9, 1958

(Be ll v. Bank of California, 153 Cal. 234 [ 94 P. 889 ] ; Rose v. Dunk-Harbison Co., 7 Cal.App.2d 502, 505-506 [ 46 P.2d 242 ].) Normally the statute of limitations begins to run at that time. (Dillon v. … Board of Pension Commrs., 18 Cal.2d 427, 430 [ 116 P.2d 37 , 136 A.L.R. 800 ].)

Harrier v. Bassford

145 Cal. 529 · California Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1904

In the case of Feeney v. Hinckley, 134 Cal. 470 , 1 it was held that an action upon a judgment is not barred until five years have elapsed from the time at which it became final. … The absence of one of the appraisers from the county caused a vacancy in the board of appraisers. We think the court had authority to appoint another person without further notice.

Campbell v. Northrop

212 Cal. 45 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1931

From this period until after the instrument in question was. executed plaintiff boarded with the defendant Lillian Northrop. … (Conlan v. Sullivan, 110 Cal. 624 [ 42 Pac. 1081 ]; Petit v. Flint etc. Co., 119 Mich. 492 [ 75 Am. St. Rep. 417 , 78 N. W. 554 ] ; Fountain v. Semi-Tropic Co., 99 Cal. 677 [ 34 Pac. 497 ].)

Escondido Oil & Development Co. v. Glaser

144 Cal. 494 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1904

(See Joyce v. Shafer, 97 Cal. 335 .) … This subject was fully discussed in Southern Pacific Co. v. Von Schmidt Dredge Co., 118 Cal. 368 .

Coffey v. City of Berkeley

170 Cal. 258 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1915

In Barnett v. Contra Costa County, 67 Cal. 78 , [ 7 Pac. 177 ], it was held that a county is not responsible in damages even for its failure to keep in repair an existing bridge, and in Winbigler v. … (Blain v. Town of Montezuma, 150 Iowa 142 , [Ann. Cas. 1912D, 430, 32 L. R. A. (N. S.) 543, 129 N. W. 808 ].)

Takahashi v. Fish & Game Commission

30 Cal. 2d 719 · California Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1947

San Diego Unified School District, 28 Cal.2d 536 [ 171 P.2d 885 ], concerned the constitutionality of section 19432 of the Civic Center Act, which allows the governing boards of school districts to refuse the use of school … When naturalization was confined to white and Negro aliens, the Supreme Court held that Hindus are neither, but surely they are not of the red, yellow, or brown races.

Burk v. Arcata & Mad River Railroad

125 Cal. 364 · California Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1899

Co. v. … Co. v.

People v. Sing Yow

145 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1904

(Williams v. Johnson, 18 Johns. 488 ; Parker v. Hardy, 24 Pick. 246 ; Pomeroy v. Columbia Ins. Co., 2 Caines, 260; Erskine v. Duffy, 76 Ga. 603 ; Greenleaf v. Grounder, 84 Me. 50 ; Moore v. … In the cross-examination of witnesses Brown and Fitzgerald we find nothing of such gravity or importance as to warrant a new trial.

Weimer v. Lowery

11 Cal. 104 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

(Brown v. Gimsan, 1 Code Rep., New Series, 1856.) … Fitzgerald v. Urton, 5 Cal. 308 ; Tartar v. Spring Creek Water and Mining Co. 5 Cal. 395 ; and Burdge v. Underwood, 6 Cal. 45 .

Horwich v. Superior Court

87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 222 · California Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1999

Opinion BROWN, J. … Law, supra, § 1197, pp. 632-633; see also Blackwell v. American Film Co. (1922) 189 Cal. 689, 693-694 [ 209 P. 999 ]; Brown v. Rahman (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1458, 1460-1461, fn. 3 [ 282 Cal.Rptr. 815 ].)

People v. Clark

201 Cal. 474 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1927

(Lunsford v. State, 10 Tex. App. 118; Ex parte Wood, 19 Tex. App. 46; Loyd v. State, 19 Tex. App. 137.) … (People v. Craig, 152 Cal. 42 [ 91 Pac. 997 ] ; People v. Hatch, 163 Cal. 368 [ 125 Pac. 907 ].)

McDonald v. Burton

68 Cal. 445 · California Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1886

In the case of Boye v. … Brown, 51 Cal. 465 ), and the object of this proceeding is to put it in that condition. Neither was the homestead right of Maria A. Burton affected by the judgment in ejectment against her.

In Re Kelso

147 Cal. 609 · California Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1905

It was so held by the supreme court of Massachusetts in Commonwealth v. Parks, 155 Mass. 531 , [ 30 N. … E. 174 ], where an ordinance prohibiting the blasting of rock and stone with gunpowder, etc., without written consent from the board of aldermen, was upheld.

Hartford Acc. Etc. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.

216 Cal. 40 · California Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1932

Corp. v. Industrial Acc. … Christy's Admr., 24 Mo. 474 ; State ex rel. v. Woodward, 8 Mo. 353 ; State ex rel. v. Sandusky, 46 Mo. 381 ; Board of Education v. National Surety Co., 183 Mo. 166, 184 [ 82 S.W. 70 ]; Showles v. Freeman, 81 Mo. 540 .)

Mannix v. R. L. Radke Co.

166 Cal. 333 · California Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1913

Two coats of hair mortar 30c. per yard sand finish 27c per yard two coats of brown mortar “Thomas Mannix.” … The decisions of this court in Laidlaw v. Marye, 133 Cal. 170 , [ 65 Pac. 391 ], and Congdon v.

People v. Shelton

60 Cal. 2d 740 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1964

(People v. King, ante, pp. 308, 311 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 825 , 384 P.2d 153 ]; People v. Haven, 59 Cal.2d 713, 719 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 47 , 381 P.2d 927]; Castaneda v. … (People v. Haven, 59 Cal.2d 713, 718 [ 31 Cal.Rptr. 47 , 381 P.2d 927 ]; Tompkins v. Superior Court, 59 Cal.2d 65, 68 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 889 , 378 P.2d 113]; People v. Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640, 643-645 [ 290 P.2d 528 ].)

Thomason v. Ashworth

73 Cal. 73 · California Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1887

Green v. … (Board of Commissioners of the Funded Debt v. Board of Trustees, 71 Cal. 310 .) *82 2. Sections 6 and 8, article 11, of the constitution read as follows:— “Sec. 6.

People v. Nelson

51 Cal. 4th 198 · California Supreme Court · Jan 20, 2011

In the course of their testimony, the jury was shown a poster board with five photographs of Mr. … Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 403 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ].)

People v. Hering

84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 839 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1999

People v. … (See People v.