Case law

IT Corp. v. Solano County Board of Supervisors

1 Cal. 4th 81 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1991

IT appealed the stop order to the County’s board of supervisors (Board). … Younger v. Superior Court (1976) 16 Cal.3d 30, 43 [ 127 Cal.Rptr. 122 , 544 P.2d 1322 ]; see Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 724 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 ].)

American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of Education

59 Cal. 2d 224 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1963

(Amer ican Civil Liberties Union v. Board of Education, 55 Cal.2d 906 [ 10 Cal.Rptr. 659 , 359 P.2d 57 ].) … Board of Education, supra, 55 Cal.2d 906 , relying on American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of Education, supra, 55 Cal.2d 167 ).

U.S. Auto Stores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

4 Cal. 3d 469 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1971

Numerous cases have interpreted this section to mean that issues not raised in the petition before the board cannot be raised by writ of review. (See, e.g., Alford v. … (See, e.g., LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 1 Cal.3d 627, 635 ; Gaiera v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Ventura County Harbor District v. Board of Supervisors

211 Cal. 271 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1930

Dist. v. … Dist. v.

Pareses v. California State Board of Prison Directors

208 Cal. 353 · California Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1929

state’s prison for the minimum term prescribed by law for the crime of second degree murder, for the commission of which offense he was duly tried and convicted, seeks by this proceeding in mcmdamus to compel the respondent Board … It must be made to appear that the Board of Prison Directors by affirmative act has accorded petitioner those credits and that they have not been declared forfeited by said board.

Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

12 Cal. 4th 533 · California Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1996

(Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 71 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ]; Moran v. Board of *560 Medical Examiners (1948) 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; McMillen v. … (Union Quarries, Inc. v. Board of County Com’rs (1970) 206 Kan. 268 [ 478 P.2d 181, 186-187 ].) In Southern Equipment Co. v.

Santa Monica Pines, Ltd. v. Rent Control Board

35 Cal. 3d 858 · California Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1984

(See The Pines v. … Appellants rely heavily on Youngblood v.

Kimball v. Board of Supervisors of Alameda County

46 Cal. 19 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

In Lincoln v. … It has been repeatedly decided that Boards of Supervisors have jurisdiction over roads, ferries, and bridges within their *24 respective counties. (Waugh v. Chauncey, 13 Cal. 11 ; People v.

Title Insurance. Co. v. State Board of Equalization

4 Cal. 4th 715 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1992

However, the cases relied on by the Board for this proposition are clearly distinguishable. The Board cites Diedrich v. … As the Board notes, a refund case throws open the taxpayer’s entire tax liability for the period in question (State Bd. of Equalization v.

Rorke v. San Francisco Stock & Exchange Board

99 Cal. 196 · California Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1893

as it is termed is claimed to have reverted to the board, and was by it sold to meet his liabilities to Wake-field and Company and other members of the board to whom he was indebted. … board had no authority to suspend appellant.

Smith v. Board of Trustees of Barnes City

198 Cal. 301 · California Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1926

As that section now reads (Stats. 1919, p. 19), it is further provided that the elective officers, i. e., the members of the board of trustees, the clerk and the treasurer, “shall hold office for the period of four years … (Donlon v. Jewett, 88 Cal. 530 [ 26 Pac. 370 ].)

Security-First National Bank v. Franchise Tax Board

55 Cal. 2d 407 · California Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1961

Co. v. State Board of Equalisation, 239 U.S. 441, 445 [ 36 S.Ct. 141 , 60 L.Ed. 372 ].) ... … (Franchise Tax Board v. Superior Court, supra, 36 Cal.2d 538, 551 .)

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

39 Cal. 3d 57 · California Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1985

(Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. … The Board’s decision denying Kaiser’s lien claim is annulled and the matter is remanded to the board for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. *69 Bird, C.

Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Board of Equalization

27 Cal. 3d 900 · California Supreme Court · Aug 18, 1980

State Board of Equalization (1965) 237 Cal.App.2d 494 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 69 ]. … Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1952) 111 Cal.App.2d 180 , 188 [ 244 P.2d 427 ]. Accord, Fox etc. Corp. v. City of Bakersfield (1950) 36 Cal.2d 136, 141-144 [ 222 P.2d 879 ]; Henry’s Restaurants of Pomona, Inc. v.

Martori Bros. Distributors v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

29 Cal. 3d 721 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1981

An administrative board must accept as true the intended meaning of uncontradicted and unimpeached evidence. (E.g., McAllister v. Workmen's Comp. App. … Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle (1977) 429 U.S. 274, 283-287 [ 50 L.Ed.2d 471, 481-484 , 97 S.Ct. 568 ]; Miller v.

Gauld v. Board of Supervisors of San Francisco

122 Cal. 18 · California Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1898

And until the proceedings of the inferior tribunal or board have culminated in a final order there is nothing to annul. … (Wilson v. Board of Supervisors, 3 Cal. 386 ; People v. County Judge, 40 Cal. 480 ; Lamb v. Schottler, 54 Cal. 321 ; Sayers v. Superior Court, 84 Cal. 645 .)

Union Pacific Railroad v. State Board of Equalization

49 Cal. 3d 138 · California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1989

Co. v. … The board relies heavily on Union Pacific R. Co. v.

Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of Equalization

27 Cal. 2d 150 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1945

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 11 Cal.2d 156, 164 [ 78 P.2d 731 , 117 A.L.R. 838 ]; see also National Ice etc. Co. v. Pacific F. Exp. Co., 11 Cal.2d 283 [ 79 P.2d 380 ]; De Aryan v. … (Crew-Levick Co. v. Pennsylvania, supra, 296 ; see also Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. (U. S.) 419 [ 6 L.Ed. 678 ]; but see Sonneborn Bros. v. Cureton, 262 U.S. 506 [ 43 S.Ct. 643 , 67 L.Ed. 1095 ].)

Harry Carian Sales v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

39 Cal. 3d 209 · California Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1985

(See, e.g., Labor Board v. Katz (1962) 369 U.S. 736, 748, fn. 16 [ 8 L.Ed.2d 230, 239 , 82 S.Ct. 1107 ]; Franks Bros. Co. v. … The Board affirmed this finding. [] [In Carian v.

Great Western Financial Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

4 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1971

Franchise Tax Board (1958) 161 Cal.App.2d 224, 229 [ 326 P.2d 611 ]) and such deductions, like credits and exemptions, are to be narrowly construed against the taxpayer (Miller v. … McColgan (1941) 17 Cal.2d 432, 441 [ 110 P.2d 419 , 134 A.L.R. 1424 ]; Burnham v. Fran *6 chise Tax Board (1959) 172 Cal.App.2d 438, 445 [ 341 P.2d 844 ]).