Case law

Paulson v. Superior Court

58 Cal. 2d 1 · California Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1962

(People v. Sullivan, 101 Cal.App.2d 322 , 328 et seq. [ 225 P.2d 645 ].) *14 The time that a jury should be held for deliberation is within the trial court’s discretion. (People v. … The result which I have reached is supported by the Supreme Court of the United States in its holding in National Labor Relations Board v.

In Re Jackson

61 Cal. 2d 500 · California Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1964

(See Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles (1958) 357 U.S. 214 [ 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 ].) … Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 [ 73 S.Ct. 397, 420-422 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ].)

Moore v. First Bank of San Luis Obispo

94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 603 · California Supreme Court · Apr 17, 2000

Like the companion case of Moshonov v. … (Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase (1992) 3 Cal.4th 1, 28 [ 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183 , 832 P.2d 899 ] (Moncharsh); Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v.

Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission

200 Cal. 579 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1927

“When an employee, working on board a vessel in navigable waters [italics ours], sustains injuries there, and seeks damages from the employer, the applicable legal principles are very different from those which would control … (Grant, Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, supra; Slate Industrial Com., etc., v. Nordenholt Corp., supra; City of Oakland v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra.)

Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los Angeles

50 Cal. 2d 713 · California Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1958

(See Rose v. State, supra; Bacich v. Board of Control, supra; Archer v. City of Los Angeles, supra; O’Sara v. Los Angeles County Flood etc. Dist., supra; House v. … (See Rose v. State, 19 Cal.2d 713 [ 123 P.2d 505 ] ; Beals v. City of Los Angeles, 23 Cal.2d 381 [ 144 P.2d 839 ]; Bacich v. Board of Control, 23 Cal.2d 343 [ 144 P.2d 818 ]; People v.

Patterson v. Padilla

254 Cal. Rptr. 3d 816 · California Supreme Court · Nov 21, 2019

(See Kennedy Wholesale, Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1991) 53 Cal.3d 245, 249-250; cf. Santos v. Brown (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 398, 409.) … Instead, the only persons named on that ballot were then-Governor Pat Brown and activist George McLain. (Rarick, California Rising: The Life and Times of Pat Brown (2005) p. 182 (Rarick).)

Associated Creditors' Agency v. Davis

13 Cal. 3d 374 · California Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1975

State Board of Equalization (1940) 40 Cal.App.2d 280, 284 [ 104 P.2d 847 ].) … See also Reynolds v. State Board of Equalization (1946) 29 Cal.2d 137, 140 [ 173 P.2d 551 , 174 P.2d 4 ]; and Weichman v. Vetri (1952) 113 Cal.App.2d 717, 719 [ 248 P.2d 783 ].)

Gillaspie v. Hagans

90 Cal. 90 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1891

plaintiff agreeing to finish the building within a reasonable time, according to the original plans and specifications, except as varied by consent of parties, and to build on the premises a laundry and wood-shed of rough boards … Proc., sec. 475; Hayne on New Trial and Appeal, sec. 286; Campbell v. Bear River etc. Co., 35 Cal. 682 ; Reynolds v. Lincoln, 71 Cal. 184 .)

Williams v. Bagnelle

138 Cal. 699 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1903

(Brown v. Anderson, 77 Cal. 236 .)

People v. Johnson

47 Cal. 3d 1194 · California Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1989

In People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 538-545 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ] (revd. on other grounds California v. … Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 456 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].) 2. Modification of Section 190.3, Factor (f).

People v. Kelly

146 Cal. 119 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1905

Lightfoot, keeper of the boarding-house at which Myrtle, Case, and Kelly put up prior to the commission of the crime; who testified that Case and the defendant registered under the names of Russel and Truan. … (People v. Hickman, 113 Cal. 86 .) 13.

Brailsford v. Blue

57 Cal. 2d 335 · California Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1962

(French v. Jordan, 28 Cal.2d 765, 770 [ 172 P.2d 46 ].) Under such circumstances, the primary election is in legal effect a general election. (Immel v. Langley, 52 Cal.2d 104, 106 [1] [ 338 P.2d 385 ].) … (Barber v. Palo Verde etc. Co., 198 Cal. 649, 651 [2] [ 246 P. 1044 ].)

People v. Haven

59 Cal. 2d 713 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1963

(Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 [ 83 S.Ct. 407, 416-417 , 9 L.Ed.2d 441 ] ; Work v. United States, 243 F.2d 660, 662 ; Takahashi v. United States, 143 F.2d 118, 122 ; United States v. … (People v. Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640, 643-645 [ 290 P.2d 528 ] ; Tompkins v. Superior Court, ante, pp. 65, 68 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 889 , 378 P.2d 113 ].)

Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo County

49 Cal. 2d 855 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1958

Curtis Brown Co., 260 U.S. 516 [ 43 S.Ct. 170 , 67 L.Ed. 372 ], The United States Supreme Court, however, has advanced beyond the presence theory of jurisdiction underlying that case. (McGee v. International Life Ins. … (Nelson v. Miller, 11 Ill.2d 378 [ 143 N.E.2d 673 ]; Smyth v. Twin State Improvement Corp., 116 Vt. 569 [ 80 A.2d 664 , 25 A.L.R.2d 1193 ]; Hess v. Pawloski, 274 U.S. 352 [ 47 S.Ct. 632 , 71 L.Ed. 1091 ]; Johns v.

Price v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.

56 Cal. 431 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

(Moses on Mandamus, 155,171; State v. Hartford & New Haven R. R. Co. 29 Conn. 538 ; The Borough of Uniontown v. Commonwealth, 34 Pa. St. 293; Maddox v. Graham, 2 Metc. Ky. 65; Fremont v. Crippen, 10 Cal. 211 ; Napa V. … Co. v. Board of Supervisors of Napa County, 30 id. 438.)

Kern Valley Water Co. v. County of Kern

137 Cal. 511 · California Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1902

It was held in People v. … (See, also, Savings and Loan Soc. v. San Francisco, 131 Cal. 356 ; San Francisco v. La Société Frangaise, 131 Cal. 612 .)

O'Connor v. Irvine

74 Cal. 435 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1887

(See authorities above cited; also Page v. Page, 8 N. H. 187; Siemon v. Schurck, 29 N. Y. 598 ; Foote v. Bryant, 47 N. Y. 544 ; Soggins v. Heard, 31 Miss. 426 ; Morey v. Herrick, 18 Pa. St. 129.) … (Osterhoudt v. Board of Supervisors, 98 N. Y. *444 239 ; Settembre v. Putnam, 30 Cal. 498 ; Gates v. Lane, 44 Cal. 396 ; Barbour on Parties, 319.)

Law v. Northern Assurance Co. of London

165 Cal. 394 · California Supreme Court · May 9, 1913

It was said in Plyer v. … Co. v. Dunleavy, 129 Ill. 148 , [ 22 N. E. 15 ]; Higgins v. Kendall, 73 Ind. 527 .)

Coverstone v. Davies

38 Cal. 2d 315 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1952

Brown, 93 Cal.App.2d 508, 512 [ 209 P.2d 156 ] ; Mackie v. Ambassador Hotel & Inv. … Neves v. Costa, 5 Cal.App. 111, 118 [ 89 P. 860 ] ; Wilson v.

People v. Ogunmola

39 Cal. 3d 120 · California Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1985

I Defendant, a board-certified gynecologist and obstetrician, was charged with and convicted of raping two patients—DC and BK—while they were “unconscious of the nature of the act.” (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (4).) … Having in mind that People v. Thomas (1978) 20 Cal.3d 457 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 215 , 573 P.2d 433 ], which we disapproved in People v.