Case law

People v. Davis

15 Cal. 4th 1096 · California Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1997

Opinion BROWN, J. … prison [and] . . . includes all of the elements of the particular felony as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 or subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7’; and ‘(3) [Certain] prior juvenile adjudication^].’ ” (People v.

City of Long Beach v. Lisenby

180 Cal. 52 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1919

In the case of Lewis v. … Co. v. City of Fort Dodge, 115 Iowa, 568 , [ 89 N. W. 7 ]; Lorence v. Bean, 18 Wash. 36 , [ 50 Pac. 582 ]; People etc. v. May, 9 Colo. 404 , [ 12 Pac. 838 ]; O’Bryan v. Owensboro, 113 Ky. 680 , [ 68 S. W. 858 , 69 S.

Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

23 Cal. Rptr. 3d 490 · California Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2005

J., Kennard, J., Werdegar, L, Chin, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred. 1 We disapprove the following pre-Vzfceri cases to the extent they are inconsistent with our opinion: Estate of Roberson (1952) 114 Cal.App.2d … 267 [ 250 P.2d 179 ]; Wilbur v.

People v. Jones

11 Cal. 4th 118 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1995

(Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688, 716 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 363 , 889 P.2d 557 ] (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.).) … (Rossi v. Brown, supra, 9 Cal.4th at p. 717 (dis. opn. of Mosk, J.), quoting Lungren v. Deukmejian (1988) 45 Cal.3d 727, 735 [ 248 Cal.Rptr. 115 , 755 P.2d 299 ].)

Moss v. Atkinson

44 Cal. 3 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

his premises, but went on and made lasting and valuable improvements thereon of great value, and now on said premises has improvements of the value of five thousand dollars, consisting of one thousand one hundred rods of board … (Kelley v. Wilson, 33 Cal. 693 .)

Goldman v. Murray

164 Cal. 419 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1912

The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff on all the issues, saving that it found that the promissory notes were not duly or at all authorized by the corporation or the board of directors thereof. … But while Cashman v. Harrison does support this view, its declarations are at variance with the earlier decisions of this court. Wheatley v. Strobe, 12 Cal. 92 , [ 73 Am. Dec. 522 ] ; Pierce v.

In Re Wilson

202 Cal. 341 · California Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1927

This contention appears to be sustained by the ruling of this court in the case of People v. Mess, 65 Cal. 174 . In that action facts quite similar in principle to those in the present proceeding were before the court. … in the county jail of Kings County under the judgment of date December 31, 1924, while he may not be legally entitled to credit therefor upon his imprisonment in the state’s prison, it is a circumstance which the state board

Holmes v. Marshall

145 Cal. 777 · California Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1905

(Schillinger v. Boes, 85 Ky. 357 ; Brown v. Balfour, 46 Minn. 68 ; First National Bank v. How, 65 Minn. 187 .) … (Bolt v. Keyhoe, 30 Hun, 619 .)

People ex rel. Meminger v. Sexton

24 Cal. 78 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1864

(The People v. The Judges of Duchess County, 20 Wend. 658 .) In Chase v. … In the case of The King v.

People v. Terry

61 Cal. 2d 137 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1964

In People v. … Cloud v. State Election Board (1934) 169 Okla. 363, 365-366 [ 36 P.2d 20 , 94 A.L.R 1007].)

People v. Jeffrey

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 852 · California Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2004

(People v. Johnson, at pp. 1054-1055, italics added; see also People v. Torres (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 771, 775 [ 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 803 ]; People v. Ambrose (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1917 [ 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 812 ].) … J., Kennard, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred.

Guerin v. Reese

33 Cal. 292 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1867

As the contractor, under the authority of Taylor v. … —"within which to pay the amount due, so as to relieve his lot of the lien and save himself from *297 the annoyance and expense of defending an action for its enforcement, and also to enable him to take an appeal to the Board

Johnson v. Department of Justice

60 Cal. 4th 871 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2015

“This is particularly true in constitutional cases,” where, as here, “ ‘correction through legislative action is practically impossible.’ ” (Payne, at p. 828; accord, Board of Supervisors v. … (Board of Supervisors v.

Mosk v. Superior Court

25 Cal. 3d 474 · California Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1979

In State Board of Law Examiners v. … (State Board of Education v. Levit (1959) 52 Cal.2d 441, 460-461 [ 343 P.2d 8 ]; see also Jenkins v. Knight (1956) 46 Cal.2d 220, 224 [ 293 P.2d 6 ].)

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. County of Monterey

California Supreme Court · Aug 3, 2023

(Ibid., italics added, citing maj. opn.’s discussion of Cohen v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 40 Cal.3d 277, 293 and Great Western Shows v. County of Los Angeles (2002) 27 Cal.4th 853, 867–868.) … Inc. v.

Metropolitan Water District v. Adams

32 Cal. 2d 620 · California Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1948

The court, not the county board of supervisors, has control of the money. (See Pomona City School Dist. v. … (See also Board of Law Library Trustees v.

Harder v. Allen

33 Cal. 2d 776 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1949

(Graham v. Bennet, 2 Cal. 503, 506 .) … (See Kyne v. Kyne, 38 Cal.App. 2d 122, 131-132 [ 100 P.2d 806 ], citing Paxton v. Paxton, 150 Cal. 667 [ 89 P. 1083 ]; also Kyne v. Kyne, 60 Cal.App.2d 326, 329 [ 140 P.2d 886 ].)

Newing v. Cheatham

15 Cal. 3d 351 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1975

About 1 p.m. on Sunday, October 25, 1970, Richard Newing, Harold Cheatham, and Ronald Bird departed from Brown Field at Chula Vista, California, aboard a single-engine Cessna 172 aircraft owned and piloted by Cheatham. … On the following day the plane’s wreckage was located by a search aircraft in mountainous terrain about 13 miles east of Tijuana, Mexico, and an equal distance southeast of Brown Field.

City of San Francisco v. Sharp

125 Cal. 534 · California Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1899

(See Hoadley v. San Francisco, 50 Cal. 265 ; 124 U. S. 639 ; Sawyer v. San Franciso, 50 Cal. 370 ; Board of Education v. Martin, 92 Cal. 209 .) … (See Sawyer v. San Francisco, 50 Cal. 370 ; Holladay v. San Francisco, 124 Cal. 352 .)

Cypress Lawn Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco

211 Cal. 387 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1931

(People v. Board of Directors, 174 Ill. 177 [ 51 N. E. 198 ].) … (Hart v. Plum, 14 Cal. 149 , 154.)