Case law

People v. Hedderly

43 Cal. 2d 476 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1954

[Wage Stabilization Board] . . . and it wasn’t written because the W.S.B. held it up.” … People v. Applegate, 91 Cal.App.2d 163, 171-173 [ 204 P.2d 689 ].)

People v. Abbott

4 Cal. Unrep. 276 · California Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1893

The burglary was effected by boring through a board partition between Ah Sic’s room and an unoccupied building near or adjoining that room so as to remove the boards for a sufficient space to take out, through the opening … In the case of State v. Hodge, 50 N.

Lavely v. Nonemaker

212 Cal. 380 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1931

(Lawrence v. Gayetty, supra.) … (Schirmer v. Drexler, 134 Cal. 134,139 [ 66 Pac. 180 ] ; Brown v. Sweet, 95 Cal. App. 117, 125 [ 272 Pac. 614 ].)

Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.

4 Cal. 3d 842 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 1971

(Chicago Board of Trade v. United States (1918) 246 U.S. 231, 238 [ 62 L.Ed. 683, 687 , 38 S.Ct. 242 ].) … (Times-Picayune v. United States, supra; Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, supra; Winn Ave. Warehouse, Inc. v. Winchester Tobacco Ware. Co. (6th Cir. 1964) 339 F.2d 277 , 280; Rogers v.

Codorniz v. Codorniz

34 Cal. 2d 811 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1950

CODORNIZ, Appellant, v. JOSEPH M. CODORNIZ, Respondent. Sac. No. 5935. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Feb. 28, 1950. Brown, Ford & Cooney for Appellant. Rutledge & Rutledge and Ralph W. Rutledge for Respondent. … Brown, 19 Cal.2d 209, 214 [ 120 P.2d 9 ]; Barlow v.

The People v. Edwards

57 Cal. 4th 658 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 2013

Friend (2009) 47 Cal.4th 1, 56 [ 97 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 , 211 P.3d 520 ], quoting Uttecht v. Brown (2007) 551 U.S. 1, 7 [ 167 L.Ed.2d 1014 , 127 S.Ct. 2218 ]; see Wainwright v. … (Uttecht v. Brown, supra, 551 U.S. at p. 9 .)

People v. Stafford Packing Co.

193 Cal. 719 · California Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1924

This point was determined adversely to appellant’s contention in People v. Truckee Lumber Co., supra. … (People v. Elk River etc. Co., 107 Cal. 219 [ 48 Am. St. Rep. 121 , 40 Pac. 486 ].)” The court there quoted with approval from State v. Roberts, 59 N. H. 256, 484 [ 47 Am.

People v. Gay

73 Cal. Rptr. 3d 442 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 2008

Two Los Angeles Police Department detectives boarded the bus in plain clothes at a stop in downtown Los Angeles and sat four seats behind them. … People v.

Barlow v. City Council of Inglewood

32 Cal. 2d 688 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1948

Grace & Co. v. California Emp. Com. (1944), 24 Cal.2d 720, 728-729 [ 151 P.2d 215 ]; Dillon v. Board of Pension Commrs. (1941), 18 Cal.2d 427, 429-430 [ 116 P.2d 37 , 136 A.L.R. 800 ]; Hermanson v. … Board of Pension Commrs. (1933), 219 Cal. 622, 625 [ 28 P.2d 21 ].)

Alcorn v. Anbro Engineering, Inc.

2 Cal. 3d 493 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1970

Assn. v. Siliznoff, supra, 38 Cal.2d 330, 336-337 ; Vargas v. Ruggiero, 197 Cal.App.2d 709, 717-718 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 568 ]; Richardson v. Pridmore, 97 Cal.App.2d 124, 130 [ 217 P.2d 113 , 17 A.L.R.2d 929 ]; Bowden v. … See, e.g., Fisher v. Carrousel Motor Hotel, Inc. (Tex. 1967) 424 S.W.2d 627 ; Beavers v. Johnson (1965) 112 Ga.App. 677 [ 145 S.E.2d 776 ]; Ruiz v. Bertolotti (1962) 37 Misc.2d 1067 [ 236 N.Y.S.2d 854 ]; Browning v.

Castro v. State of California

2 Cal. 3d 223 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1970

(See, e.g., Baker v. Carr, supra, 369 U.S. 186 ; Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, supra, 383 U.S. 663 ; Williams v. Rhodes, supra, 393 U.S. 23 .) … Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 667 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 169 . 172. 86 S.Ct. 1079 ] (1966); Kramer v.

Blotter v. Farrell

42 Cal. 2d 804 · California Supreme Court · May 18, 1954

(Hurst v. City of Burlingame, 207 Cal. 134, 140-141 [ 277 P. 308 ].) … (Chase v. Kalber, 28 Cal.App. 561, 569-570 [ 153 P. 397 ] ; 18 Cal.Jur. 946-947; see also Starbuck v. City of Fullerton, 34 Cal.App. 683 [ 186 P. 583 ].)

Smith v. California Highway Indemnity Exchange

218 Cal. 325 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1933

(Nicol v. Davis, 107 Cal. App. 26 [ 290 Pac. 114 ].) The judgment remained unsatisfied and the plaintiff brought this action against Davis’ insurance carrier, the defendant herein. … The policy sued on was obtained by Davis in pursuance of the requirement of an ordinance of the city that before any person could operate a jitney bus he must obtain an operator’s permit from the board of police commissioners

City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center Authority v. Superior Court

7 Cal. 3d 861 · California Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1972

(Miller v. … West v.

Rahmel v. Lehndorff

142 Cal. 681 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1904

(Warder v. Enslen, 73 Cal. 291 .) … In Rommel v. Schambacher, 120 Pa.

Wilson v. Fitch

41 Cal. 363 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1871

(Earl of Leicester v. Walter, 2 Camp. 251; 1 Maule & Selw. 284; Anthon’s Nisi Prius, 38-40, and notes; Noble v. Fuller, Peak’s Add. Cases, 139.) But the current of modern authorities is to the contrary. (Treat v. … Browning, 4 Conn. 415 ; Jones v. Stevens, 11 Price, 82; Mills et al. v. Spencer et al., 1 Holt, 53; 3 Engl. C. L. R. 177; Inman v. Foster, 8 Wend. 606 ; Saunders v. Mills, 6 Bing. 215, 220; 19 Engl. C. L.

Gin S. Chow v. City of Santa Barbara

217 Cal. 673 · California Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1933

(Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 [ 234 Pac. 381 , 38 A. L. R. 1479]; Dwyer v. City Council, 200 Cal. 505 [ 253 Pac. 932 ]; Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365 [47 Sup. Ct. 114, 71 L. … In the state of Washington the earlier cases were not in harmony, but whatever confusion existed was set at rest in Brown v.

People v. Superior Court (Good)

17 Cal. 3d 732 · California Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1976

(Allen v. California Water & Tel. Co. (1947) 31 Cal.2d 104, 109 [ 187 P.2d 393 ]; Continental Vinyl Products Corp. v. Mead Corp. (1972) 27 Cal.App.3d 543, 549 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 806 ].) … (Continental Vinyl Products Corp. v. Mead Corp., supra, 27 Cal.App.3d 543, 552 ; Cuneo v.

People v. Hernandez

93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 509 · California Supreme Court · Mar 16, 2000

*528 BROWN, J., Concurring. I agree with the disposition, but reach this conclusion through a somewhat different analysis. … (See People v.

Lukrawka v. Spring Valley Water Co.

169 Cal. 318 · California Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1915

In the case of Bothwell v. Consumers’ Co., 13 Idaho, 568 , [24 L. R A. (N. … (Price v. Riverside L. & I. Co., 56 Cal. 431 ; Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co., 139 Cal. 22 , [ 72 Pac. 395 ]; Fellows v. Los Angeles, 151 Cal. 52 , [90 Pac. 137]; South Pasadena v. Pasadena Land etc.