Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscal

10,000+ results

1.15s

  • Irvine Co. v. California Employment Commission

    27 Cal. 2d 570 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1946

    (Carroll v. California Horse Racing Board, 16 Cal.2d 164, 168 [ 105 P.2d 110 ]; Marculescu v. City Planning Commission, 7 Cal.App.2d 371, 375 [ 46 P.2d 308 ].) … For this proposition they cite such cases as North Whittier Heights Citrus Assn. v. National Labor Relations Board, 109 F.2d 76 , and Equitable Life Insurance Co. v. Iowa Employment Sec.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Rand Resources, LLC v. City of Carson

    243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2019

    Board of Trustees of California State University (2017) 2 Cal.5th 1057, 1063 (Park)). … Tamborelli Law Group and John V. Tamborelli for Defendants and Respondents Leonard Bloom and U.S. Capital LLC. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Thomas B. Brown and Amy E.

    Cited 185 timesPublished
  • People v. Capistrano

    59 Cal. 4th 830 · California Supreme Court · Aug 4, 2014

    (Uttecht v. Brown, supra, at p. 7 [“Deference is owed regardless of whether the trial court engages in explicit analysis regarding substantial impairment . . . .”].) … (People v. Turner (2004) 34 Cal.4th 406, 439-440 [ 20 Cal.Rptr.3d 182 , 99 P.3d 505 ]; People v. Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at pp. 403-404.)

    Overruled on other grounds by People v. Hardy, 233 Cal. Rptr. 3d 378 (2018)Cited 203 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New York

    138 Cal. 285 · California Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1903

    In Insurance Company v. … (Hadley v. Carter, 8 N. H. 40; Elmer v. Fessenden, 151 Mass. 359 .) The supreme court of Ohio, in Lake Shore etc. R. R. v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa, Inc. v. 32nd District Agricultural Ass'n

    42 Cal. 3d 929 · California Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1986

    Board of Supervisors (1981) 122 Cal.App.3d 813, 822 [ 176 Cal.Rptr. 342 ].) … (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].)

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Sperry & Co. v. Percival Milling Co.

    81 Cal. 252 · California Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1889

    On one side of plaintiff’s package is a label on light-brown paper, about six inches long and three inches wide, with a small red border. On the upper side are the words, printed in blue, “ Germea for Breakfast.” … In Lockwood v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People v. Rae

    66 Cal. 423 · California Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1885

    What he did was this: In company with a confederate, who passed by the name of Turner, he boarded an emigrant train of the Central Pacific Bail-road Company, and engaged the prosecuting witness, who was a passenger on the … Still closer as respects the facts, and therefore more directly in point, is the case of Loomis et al. v. The People, 67 N. Y. 322 .

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Los Angeles County Transportation Commission v. Richmond

    31 Cal. 3d 197 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1982

    Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208, 230-231 [ 149 Cal. Rptr. 239 , 583 P.2d 1281 ]; Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan (1980) 27 Cal.3d 855, 863 [ 167 Cal. … Improvement Dist. v. Board of Supervisors (1980) 112 Cal. App.3d 545, 552 [ 169 Cal. Rptr. 391 ].)

    Cited 61 timesPublished
  • Story v. Christin

    14 Cal. 2d 592 · California Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1939

    (Attorney-General v. State Board Judges, 38 Cal. 291, 296 .) It is a matter of common knowledge that in the nursery business the young trees often remain in the soil for much longer than one year. … (Shasta Lumber Co. v. McCoy, 85 Cal. App. 468 [ 259 Pac. 965 ]; Charles J. Off & Co. v. Morehead, 255 Ill. 40 [ 85 N. E. 264 , 126 Am. St. Rep. 189 , 14 Ann. Cas. 434, 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 167]; Swift & Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Barme v. Wood

    37 Cal. 3d 174 · California Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1984

    In Li v. Yellow Cab Company (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804, 811 [ 119 Cal. … (See, e.g., Brown v. Stewart (1982) 129 Cal. App.3d 331, 341 [ 181 Cal.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Kockemann v. Bickel

    92 Cal. 665 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1892

    assignment of the certificate of sale, and “ inclosed and protected the same with a substantial fence, excepting a small gateway on the front end of said lot, which opened on the street; that said fence was composed of posts, boards … (Wilson v. Atkinson, 77 Cal. 485 .)

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Gay v. Gay

    146 Cal. 237 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1905

    In Bohnert v. … (Johnson v. Brown, 115 Cal. 697 .)

    Cited 53 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Regents of University of California

    25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 320 · California Supreme Court · Mar 7, 2005

    (Flores v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied May 18, 2005. [1] 1 Westlake Community Hosp. v.

    Questioned by Neushul v. Regents of the University of California, 168 F. Supp. 3d 1242 (2016)Cited 188 timesPublished
  • Ludwicki v. Guerin

    57 Cal. 2d 127 · California Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1961

    (Brown v. Superior Court, 34 Cal.2d 559, 565 [ 212 P.2d 878 ].) … (Brewer v.

    Superseded by statute, as recognized in Ferraro v. CamarlinghiCited 47 timesPublished
  • Matter of Russell

    163 Cal. 668 · California Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1912

    (Von Schmidt v. Widber, 105 Cal. 157 , [ 38 Pac. 682 ]; Hyatt v. Williams, 148 Cal. 585 , [ 84 Pac. 41 ]; Platt v. San Francisco, 158 Cal. 82 , [ 110 Pac. 304 ].) … Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 149 U. S. 465 , [ 37 L. Ed. 810 , 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 990]; Northwest etc. Co. v. St. Charles, 154 Fed. 388 , and Muscogee etc. Co. v. Hall, 4 Ind. *681 Ter. 18, [ 64 S. W. 603 ].

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • People v. Doyell

    48 Cal. 85 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

    (People v. Haun, 44 Cal. 96 .) … (People v. Bealoba, 17 Cal. 389 ; People v. Sanchez, 24 Cal. 17 ; People v. Foren, 25 Cal. 361 ; 1 East’s P. C. 255; Wharton’s Am. Cr. L. 420; 1 Browne’s appendix, 22; 1 Ashm. 298-9.)

    Cited 94 timesPublished
  • People v. Kelii

    87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 674 · California Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1999

    (People v. Woodell, supra, 17 Cal.4th at p. 452 .) … J., Baxter, J. and Brown, J., concurred. A11 further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • People v. Mullings

    83 Cal. 138 · California Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1890

    In Bigler v. … For instance, counsel for respondents cites People v. Brown, 76 Cal. 574 .

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)

    29 Cal. 3d 210 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1981

    (See, e.g., State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., supra, 429 U.S. 363, 375 [ 50 L.Ed.2d 550, 561 ]; Barney v. Keokuk, supra, 94 U.S. 324, 338 ; Hardin v. … He relies upon cases which recognize the protection of property rights afforded by the federal and state Constitutions. ( Board of Regents v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Skinner v. City of Santa Rosa

    107 Cal. 464 · California Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1895

    The case of Moore v. City of Walla Walla, 60 Fed. … (Judson v. City of Bessemer, 87 Ala. 240 ; Trustees of University v. Moody, 62 Ala. 389 ; Moore v. City of Walla Walla, 60 Fed. Rep. 961.)

    Cited 32 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.