Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.09s
55 Cal. 159 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880
(See, also, Fulton Bank v. N. Y. & Sharon Canal Co. 4th Paige, 127.) … (Farrel Foundry Co. v. Dart, 26 Conn. 376 .)
Cited 5 timesPublished215 Cal. 12 · California Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1932
(People v. Thomson, supra; Herman v. State, 75 Miss. 340 [ 22 South. 873 ]; Keifer v. State, 199 Ind. 10 [ 154 N. E. 870 ]; State v. Nelson, 148 Minn. 285 [ 181 N. W. 850 ].) … (People v. Costa, 24 Cal. App. 739 [ 142 Pac. 508 ]; People v. Oldham, 111 Cal. 648 [ 44 Pac. 312 ] ; Brown v. State, 20 Ala. App. 39 [ 100 South. 616 ].)
Cited 26 timesPublished5 Cal. 3d 458 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1971
Deputy Lambe then directed defendant to remove herself from the bed; and, without having to move any bedding or clothing, he looked under the bed with his flashlight and saw a brown paper sack. … As stated by this court in Duke v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedJulian v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance
27 Cal. Rptr. 3d 648 · California Supreme Court · May 5, 2005
*762 BROWN, J., Concurring.—I concur with the majority’s judgment affirming the Court of Appeal. … (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v.
Cited 141 timesPublished128 Cal. 464 · California Supreme Court · May 3, 1900
Bank v. Smith, 101 Cal. 415 ; Adams v. Wallace, 119 Cal. 67 ; Roberts v. Riddle, 79 Pa. St. 469; Klein v. Kern, 94 Tenn. 34 ; Huff v. Slife, 25 Neb. 448; 13 Am. St. Rep. 497 ; Shropshire v. Smith (Tex. Civ. … Rep. 174 ; Maxwell v. Capehart, 62 Minn. 377 ; Clay v. Edgerton, 19 Ohio St. 549 ; 2 Am. Rep. 422 ; Brown v. Curtiss, 2 N. Y. 225; Coburn v. Brooks, 78 Cal. 443 ; First Nat. Bank v. Babcock, 94 Cal. 96 ; 28 Am. St.
Cited 28 timesPublished88 Cal. 6 · California Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1891
He called again, between Christmas and Ne\v Year’s, and saw my hus *10 band and myself. … (People v. Benson, 6 Cal. 221 ; 65 Am. Dec. 506 ; People v. Hamilton, 46 Cal. 540 ; People v. Brown, 47 Cal. 447 ; People v. Ardaga, 51 Cal. 371 .)
Cited 14 timesPublished102 Cal. 666 · California Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1894
(Nelson v. Iverson, 17 Ala. 216 . See, also, Burditt v. Hunt, 25 Me. 422 ; 43 Am. Dec. 289 .) In Parker v. … (See, also, Frome v. Dennis, 45 N. J. L. 515; Loring v. Mulcahy, 3 Allen, 575 ; Gurley v. Armstead, 148 Mass. 267 ; 12 Am. St. Rep. 555 .)
Cited 21 timesPublished35 Cal. 2d 76 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1950
Dist. v. … City of Los Angeles), and Saldana v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedPollard v. Saxe & Yolles Development Co.
12 Cal. 3d 374 · California Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1974
In Dow v. … (Burns v. Brown (1946) 27 Cal.2d 631 [ 166 P.2d 1 ]; St. George v. Superior Court (1949) 93 Cal.App.2d 815 [ 209 P.2d 823 ].) There is no showing he acted arbitrarily.
Cited 22 timesPublished19 Cal. 3d 278 · California Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1977
Bank v. Brown (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 98, 104-106 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 742 ]; Wright v. Rogers (1959) 172 Cal.App.2d 349, 361-362 [ 342 P.2d 447 ]; Chung v. Johnston (1954) 128 Cal.App.2d 157, 164 [ 274 P.2d 922 ]; Bell v. … Brown, 18 Cal.App.3d 98, 104-106 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 742 ] [preponderance of evidence sufficient].)”
Cited 133 timesPublishedMiller v. California Insurance
76 Cal. 145 · California Supreme Court · May 15, 1888
To secure an indemnity against these is the purpose and object of a policy of marine insurance.....But the explosion of the boiler on board the Panama had no marine character at all. … Co. v. Glasgow, 9 Mo. 413 .
Cited 1 timesPublished122 Cal. 171 · California Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1898
On the bank was lying a wet piece of board, which, glistening in the *175 sun, Milner thought was Dar rail’s rifle. Darrah moved away, approaching the piece of board. Milner shouted to him not to pick up the gun. … (People v. Westlake, 62 Cal. 303 ; People v. Smith, 93 Cal. 445 .)
Cited 86 timesPublishedThorn v. California Academy of Sciences
183 Cal. 512 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1920
The Louisiana case was approvingly cited in Baker v. Brown, 83 Miss. 793 , [1 Ann. … The learned court, however, also based its decision on McMichael v. Bankston , expressly approving the doctrine thereof.
Cited 39 timesPublished236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 353 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 2018
(Bonnell v. Medical Board (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1255, 1265; Larkin, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 158.) … Brown and Joanna S. McCallum for Defendant and Respondent. Morrison & Foerster, James R. McGuire and Nancy R.
Cited 57 timesPublishedDow v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.
157 Cal. 182 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1910
(McKay v. Southern Bell Tel. Co., 111 Ala. 337 , [ 56 Am. St. Rep. 59 , 19 South. 695 , 31 L. R. A. 589]; Brown v. Consolidated etc. Power Co., (Mo.) 109 S. W. 1032 ; Hebert v. Lake Charles etc. … (Sappenfield v. Main St. R. R. Co., 91 Cal. 48 , [ 27 Pac. 590 ]; Limberg v. Lumber Co., 127 Cal. 604 , [ 60 Pac. 176 ]; Helling v. Schindler, 145 Cal. 313 , [ 78 Pac. 710 ].)
Cited 27 timesPublished29 Cal. 2d 834 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1947
Likewise, in Andrews v. … (Gordoy v. Flaherty, 9 Cal.2d 716 [ 72 P.2d 538 ]; Peccolo v. City of Los Angeles, 8 Cal.2d 532 [ 66 P.2d 651 ]; Kish v. California State Automobile Assn., 190 Cal. 246 [ 212 P. 27 ] ; Martinelli v.
Cited 47 timesPublished12 Cal. 2d 605 · California Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1939
(Bueneman v. City of Santa Barbara, 8 Cal. (2d) 405, 407 [ 65 Pac. (2d) 884 , 109 A. L. R. 895]; Jones v. City of Los Angeles, 211 Cal. 304 [ 295 Pac. 14 ]; Wheeler v. Herbert, 152 Cal. 224 [ 92 Pac. 353 ]; Schofield v. … Board of Supervisors, 189 Cal. 254 [ 208 Pac. 304 ]; Mordecai v. Board of Supervisors, 183 Cal. 434 [ 192 Pac. 40 ].)
Cited 39 timesPublished14 Cal. 4th 126 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1996
J., Mosk, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. … Proc., § 902; Garrison v. Board of Directors (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1670 [ 43 Cal.Rptr.2d 214 ]; 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (3d ed. 1985) Appeal, § 135, p. 145.)
Cited 33 timesPublished56 Cal. 229 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880
It' arrests the proceedings of any tribunal, corporation, board, or person, when such proceedings are without, or in excess of, the jurisdiction of such tribunal, corporation, board, or person.” … In the case of Miazza v.
Cited 38 timesPublishedGeneral Insurance v. Superior Court
15 Cal. 3d 449 · California Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1975
(Anglo-California Bank v. Griswold (1908) 153 Cal. 692, 696-697 [ 96 P. 353 ]; Roth v. Superor Court (1905) 147 Cal. 604, 605 [ 82 P. 246 ]; Cooper v. Gordon (1899) 125 Cal. 296, 300-302 [ 57 P. 1006 ]; RCA Corp. v. … Superior Court (1975) 47 Cal.App.3d 1007, 1009-1010 [ 121 Cal.Rptr. 441 ]; O’Keefe v. Miller (1965) 231 Cal.App.2d 920 , 924 et seq. [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 343 ]; Brown v.
Cited 36 timesPublished
Ask Donna