Case law

De La Torre v. CashCall, Inc.

236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 353 · California Supreme Court · Aug 13, 2018

(Bonnell v. Medical Board (2003) 31 Cal.4th 1255, 1265; Larkin, supra, 62 Cal.4th at p. 158.) … Brown and Joanna S. McCallum for Defendant and Respondent. Morrison & Foerster, James R. McGuire and Nancy R.

People v. Un Dong

106 Cal. 83 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1895

The questions asked were not only in large part violative of the defendant’s right to have his cross-examination confined to the subject matter of his testimony in chief (People v. O’Brien, 66 Cal. 603 ; People v. … (People v. Wells, 100 Cal. 459 .)

In Re Smith

73 Cal. Rptr. 3d 469 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 2008

In Terhune v. … In the followup case of People v.

Ward v. Taggart

51 Cal. 2d 736 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1959

(See Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 39-40 ; Briggs v. Rodriguez, 236 S.W.2d 510, 514-516 (Tex. Civ.App); 30 Tex.L.Rev. 371, 372.) In Crogan v. … In Steiner v.

In Re Davis

37 Cal. 2d 872 · California Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1951

Brown, Attorney General, and Clarence A. Linn, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. *873 SCHAUER, J. … (See People v. Perkins (1951), ante, p. 62 [ 230 P.2d 353 ]; People v. Hayden (1950), 99 Cal.App.2d 97 [ 221 P.2d 221 ]; People v. Merrill (1951), 104 Cal.App.2d 257, 266-267 [ 231 P.2d 573 ]; People v.

People v. Davis

79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 295 · California Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1998

(People v. Brown (1894) 105 Cal. 66, 69 [ 38 P. 518 ]; People v. Jaso (1970) 4 Cal.App.3d 767, 771-772 [ 84 Cal.Rptr. 567 ]; People v. Turner (1968) 267 Cal.App.2d 440, 444 [ 73 Cal.Rptr. 263 , 38 A.L.R.3d 940 ].) … {People v. Brown, supra, 105 Cal. at p. 69 .) But the general rule is not inflexible: “The word ‘permanently,’ as used here is not to be taken literally.” (Perkins, supra, at p. 327.)

Nat. Lawyers Guild etc. v. City of Hayward

9 Cal. 5th 488 · California Supreme Court · May 28, 2020

People v. … Choi; Kathryn Meola and Michael Ambrose for The California School Boards Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

State of California v. Superior Court (Lyon)

29 Cal. 3d 210 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1981

(See, e.g., State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co., supra, 429 U.S. 363, 375 [ 50 L.Ed.2d 550, 561 ]; Barney v. Keokuk, supra, 94 U.S. 324, 338 ; Hardin v. … He relies upon cases which recognize the protection of property rights afforded by the federal and state Constitutions. ( Board of Regents v.

S. Cal. Rapid Transit Dist. v. WORKERS'COMP. APP. BD.

23 Cal. 3d 158 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1979

Rptr. 666 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, INC., Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and ELLIOTT WEITZMAN, Respondents. Docket No. L.A. 30990. Supreme Court of California. … Co. v. Workers' Comp.

In Re Morton

179 Cal. 510 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1918

A short time thereafter, induced by the same instrumentality, Robertson drew another check for two hundred dollars, the balance of the deposit, in favor of one Hayes, with which he was assured better board while in jail, … The ease of People v. Kraker, 72 Cal. 459 , [ 1 Am. St.

Ex Parte Bailey

155 Cal. 472 · California Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1909

“The board of trustees of the town of- Santa Monica do ordain as follows:— “Section 1. … (People v. Truckee etc. Co., 116 Cal. 397 , [ 58 Am. St. Rep. 183 , 48 Pac. 374 ].)

Pullen v. Placer Country Bank

138 Cal. 169 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1902

(Florence Mining Co. v. Brown, 124 U.S. 385 .) In Hopkinson v. … Bank v.

Clute v. Superior Court of S.F.

155 Cal. 15 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1908

Co. v. Fremont, 7 Cal. 130 ; Heinlen v. Cross, 63 Cal. 44 ; Swift v. Shepard, 64 Cal. 423 , [ 1 Pac. 493 ]; Dewey v. Superior Court, 81 Cal. 64 , 22 Pac. 333 ; Rogers v. … (Foster v. Superior Court, 115 Cal. 279 , [ 47 Pac. 58 ]; Mark v. Superior Court, 129 Cal. 1 , [ 61 Pac. 436 ]; Schwarz v. Superior Court, 111 Cal. 106 , [ 43 Pac. 580 ]; Stewart v.

Steiner v. Rowley

35 Cal. 2d 713 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1950

Young, 9 Cal.App.2d 545 [ 50 P.2d 495 ]; Smith v. Brown, 1 Cal.App.2d 492, 495 [ 36 P.2d 1081 ]; see Early v. Owens, 109 Cal.App. 489, 494 [ 293 P. 136 ]). … Co. v Eyraud, 208 Cal. *720 566 [ 283 P. 65 ]; Mix v. Yoakum, 200 Cal. 681 [ 254 P. 557 ]; Hayter v. Fulmor, 66 Cal.App.2d 554 [152 P.2d 746]; Brooks v. City of Monterey, 106 Cal.App. 649 [ 290 P. 540 ]; Snyder v.

Matteson v. Wagoner

147 Cal. 739 · California Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1905

In Kelley v. … (Lawrence v. Ballou, 50 Cal. 258 ; Jeffers v. Cook, 58 Cal. 151 ; Spaulding v. Howard, 121 Cal. 198 , [ 53 Pac. 563 ]; Newman v. Marvin, 12 Hun, 242 ; Shaw v. Cock, 78 N. Y. 194 ; Magaw v. Clark, 6 Watts, 328 ; Brown v.

People v. Milner

122 Cal. 171 · California Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1898

On the bank was lying a wet piece of board, which, glistening in the *175 sun, Milner thought was Dar rail’s rifle. Darrah moved away, approaching the piece of board. Milner shouted to him not to pick up the gun. … (People v. Westlake, 62 Cal. 303 ; People v. Smith, 93 Cal. 445 .)

People v. Lynch

50 Cal. 4th 693 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 2010

(Uttecht v. Brown, supra, 551 U.S. at p. 18 ; see Wainwright v. … (Uttecht v. Brown, supra, 551 U.S. at p. 18 .)

People v. Zirbes

6 Cal. 2d 425 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1936

(People v. Van Cleave, 208 Cal. 295, 300 [ 280 Pac. 983 ]; People v. Darling, 120 Cal. … Upon this subject the District Court of Appeal in the case of People v. Brown, 71 Cal.

People v. Abbott

4 Cal. Unrep. 276 · California Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1893

The burglary was effected by boring through a board partition between Ah Sic’s room and an unoccupied building near or adjoining that room so as to remove the boards for a sufficient space to take out, through the opening … In the case of State v. Hodge, 50 N.

In Re Fluery

67 Cal. 2d 600 · California Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1967

Chadboume, Inc. v. Superior Court, 60 Cal.2d 723, 731, fn. 5 [ 36 Cal.Rptr. 468 , 388 P.2d 700 ] ; County of Madera v. … Board of Education, 55 Cal.2d 167, 181 [ 10 Cal.Rptr. 647 , 359 P.2d 45 , 94 A.L.R.2d 1259 ].) Petitioner is serving a prison sentence for second degree burglary (maximum term 15 years; Pen.