Case law

Turlock Irrigation District v. Williams

76 Cal. 360 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1888

Supervisors Yolo County, 47 Cal. 223 ; Dean v. Davis, 51 Cal. 406 ; People v. Williams, 56 Cal. 647 ; People v. La Rue, 67 Cal. 526 ; Reclamation District v. Hagar, 66 Cal. 54 . … (Hagar v. Rec. Dist., 111 U. S. 705 , citing Mobile Co. v. Kimball, 102 U. S. 691 -704.)

People v. Santana

56 Cal. 4th 999 · California Supreme Court · Jun 10, 2013

(See People v. … (See People v.

People v. Zirbes

6 Cal. 2d 425 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1936

(People v. Van Cleave, 208 Cal. 295, 300 [ 280 Pac. 983 ]; People v. Darling, 120 Cal. … Upon this subject the District Court of Appeal in the case of People v. Brown, 71 Cal.

Abbott v. Jack

136 Cal. 510 · California Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1902

Sanger, 130 Cal. 434 ; Carpy v. … Code, secs. 322, 324; Duke v. Huntington, 130 Cal. 274 ; Baines v. *514 Babcock, 95 Cal. 593 ; Moore v. Boyd, 74 Cal. 174 ; O’Connor v. Witherby, 111 Cal. 528 .) R». E.

Hicks v. Lovell

64 Cal. 14 · California Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1883

(Clark v. Lockwood, 21 Cal. 220; Meador v. Parsons, 19 Cal. 294 ; Lestrade v. Barth, 19 Cal. 666 ; Cadiz v. Majors, 33 Cal. 288 ; McCauley v. Fulton, 44 Cal. 356 ; Tormey v. True, 45 Cal. 105 ; Kenyon v. … (Conrad v. Lindley, 2 Cal. 173 ; Brown v. Covillaud, 6 Cal. 566 ; Green v. Covillaud, 10 Cal. 317 ; Willard v. Tayloe, 8 Wall. 557 .) That was the position of the defendant on his cross-complaint.

Henry v. Southern Pacific Railroad

50 Cal. 176 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

(Hall v. Sac. V. R. R. Co., 14 Cal. 387 .) … In Ryan v. N. Y. C. R.

McDermont v. Anaheim Union Water Co.

124 Cal. 112 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1899

(McFadden v. Board of Supervisors, 74 Cal. 571 .)

E. K. Wood Lumber Co. v. Higgins

54 Cal. 2d 91 · California Supreme Court · May 10, 1960

(Primm v. Primm, 46 Cal.2d 690, 693 [1] [ 299 P.2d 231 ].) * 2. … Justice Vallée, in Overton v.

Webber v. Clarke

74 Cal. 11 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1887

(Hicks v. Coleman, 25 Cal. 122 ; 85 Am. Dec. 103 ; Hoag v. Pierce, 28 Cal. 191 ; McKee v. Greene, 31 Cal. 420 ; Ayres v. Bensley, 32 Cal. 631 ; Russell v. Harris, 38 Cal. 426 ; 99 Am. Dec. 421 ; Donahue v. … (Sharp v. Blankenship, 59 Cal. 288 ; C. P. R. R. Co. v. Shackelford, 63 Cal. 261 ; Johnson v. Brown, 63 Cal. 392 .) Nor is the non-payment for 1883 important.

People v. Gutierrez

45 Cal. 4th 789 · California Supreme Court · Feb 19, 2009

Defendant’s reference to Brown v. Louisiana is misplaced. Defendant cites Brown v. … (Brown v. Louisiana, supra, 447 U.S. at p. 336 .)

People v. Duane

21 Cal. 2d 71 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1942

In People v. … In People v.

Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco

20 Cal. 2d 101 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1942

R. 128]; People v. McGowan, 118 Misc. 828 [ 195 N. Y. Supp. 286 , 289]; Lang’s Creamery v. City of Niagara Falls, 224 App. Div. 483 [ 231 N. Y. Supp. 368 ]; State v. Edwards, 187 N. C. 259 [ 121 S. E. 444 ]; Moll v. … Board of Med.

Summers v. Newman

86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 303 · California Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1999

(Ornelas v. Randolph (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1095, 1111 [ 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 594 , 847 P.2d 560 ] (dis. opn. of Panelli, J.).) … Brown, J., concurred.

In Re Security Finance Co.

49 Cal. 2d 370 · California Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1957

(See Bowditch v. … Lane & Co. v.

Rush v. Casey

39 Cal. 339 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

By Section 13 of the Act of Congress of March 3, 1851, establishing the Board of Land Commissioners for the adjudication of private land claims in this State, it is provided that all lands included in claims which shall be … [Rush v. Copeland, involving the same points, was decided upon the authority of Rush v. Casey.

Woosley v. State of California

3 Cal. 4th 758 · California Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1992

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 647 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … We disapprove the decisions in Schoderbek v. Carlson, supra, 113 Cal.App.3d 1029 ; Lattin v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 75 Cal.App.3d 377 ; Javor v.

Rogers v. Superior Court

46 Cal. 2d 3 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1955

(People v. Kelley, 22 Cal.2d 169, 176 [ 137 P.2d 1 ]; People v. MacArthur, 125 Cal.App.2d 212, 219 [ 270 P.2d 37 ]; People v. Henry, 86 Cal.App.2d 785, 789 [ 195 P.2d 478 ]; People v. … Nebraska, supra, 342 U.S. 55, 65 ; Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278, 285, 286 [ 56 S.Ct. 461 , 80 L.Ed. 682 ]; Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227, 236, 238 [ 60 S.Ct. 472 , 84 L.Ed. 716 ]; Lisenba v.

Sawday v. Vista Irrigation District

64 Cal. 2d 833 · California Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1966

(Local 659, I.A.T.S.E. v. Color Corp. of America, 47 Cal.2d 189, 194-195 [2] [ 302 P.2d 294 ]; Case v. Kadota Fig Assn., 35 Cal.2d 596, 606 [ 220 P.2d 912 ]; Loscalzo v. Federal Mut. Ins. … (Loscalzo v. Federal Mut. Ins. Co., supra, 228 Cal.App.2d 391, 396-397 [5, 6]; Bertero v. Superior Court, 216 Cal.App.2d 213, 219 [4] [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 719 ]; Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v.

Fortenbury v. Superior Court

16 Cal. 2d 405 · California Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1940

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. Lyons (ante, p. 389 [ 106 Pac. (2d) 414 ]), and McKay v.

Chern v. Bank of America

15 Cal. 3d 866 · California Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1976

(Todhunter v. Smith (1934) 219 Cal. 690, 695 [ 28 P.2d 916 ]; Pacific Maritime Assn. v. California Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board (1965) 236 Cal.App.2d 325, 332 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 892 ]; Braye v. … (D’Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 20 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ] [applying pre-1974 law]; Coyne v. Krempels (1950) 36 Cal.2d 257, 262-263 [ 223 P.2d 244 ].)