Case law

Williams v. Long

139 Cal. 186 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1903

(Gray v. Tubbs, 43 Cal. 363 ; Martin v. … (Hannan v. McNickle, 82 Cal. 126 ; Rhorer v. Bila, 83 Cal. 54 .) This disposes of all the points made on the motion for a nonsuit, and we think it was properly denied.

Loftus v. Dehail

133 Cal. 214 · California Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1901

Venturesome boys, and even girls, make playgrounds of unfinished buildings, climb perilous heights, and scamper over insecure boards and rafters. … It has recently received the detailed consideration of this court, in Peters v.

Martin Ship Service Co. v. City of LA

34 Cal. 2d 793 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1950

(National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 37-41 [ 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 ]; United States v. … (South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros., 303 U.S. 177, 184-185 [ 58 S.Ct. 510 , 82 L.Ed. 734 ]; Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of R. R.

Steiner v. Rowley

35 Cal. 2d 713 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1950

Young, 9 Cal.App.2d 545 [ 50 P.2d 495 ]; Smith v. Brown, 1 Cal.App.2d 492, 495 [ 36 P.2d 1081 ]; see Early v. Owens, 109 Cal.App. 489, 494 [ 293 P. 136 ]). … Co. v Eyraud, 208 Cal. *720 566 [ 283 P. 65 ]; Mix v. Yoakum, 200 Cal. 681 [ 254 P. 557 ]; Hayter v. Fulmor, 66 Cal.App.2d 554 [152 P.2d 746]; Brooks v. City of Monterey, 106 Cal.App. 649 [ 290 P. 540 ]; Snyder v.

City of Oakland v. Brock

8 Cal. 2d 639 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1937

Jur., p. 804; Korth v. City of Portland, 123 Or. 180 [ 261 Pac. 895 , 58 A. L. R. 665]; Sterett & Oberle Packing Co. v. City of Portland, 79 Or. 260 [ 154 Pac. 410 ]; State v. Nelson, 66 Minn. 166 [ 68 N. … Proc.; Nougues v. Douglass, 7 Cal. 65 ; U’Ren v. State Board of Control, 31 Cal. App. 6, 12 [ 159 Pac. 615 ]; 59 Cor.

People v. Siripongs

45 Cal. 3d 548 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1988

Former CALJIC No. 8.84.2—Brown The jury was also instructed in the unadorned language of former CALJIC No. 8.84.2. As we explained in People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d 512, 536-544 , and People v. … Neither counsel misled the jury on the first aspect of Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d 512 .

Del Mar Canning Co. v. Payne

29 Cal. 2d 380 · California Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1946

John Milton Thompson, Orrick, Dahlquist, Neff, Brown & Herrington and Willard Johnston for Petitioner. Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General and Ralph W. Scott, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondents. … City of Santa Maria, 38 Cal.App.2d 215 [ 100 P.2d 1108 ]; Los Angeles County v. Hollywood Cemetery Assn., 124 Cal. 344 [ 57 P. 153 , 71 Am.St.Rep. 75 ].) In Ferrante v.

People v. Dent

132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 527 · California Supreme Court · Apr 10, 2003

Such a solicitous approach, however, evidently violated Faretta v. … (People v. *225 Joseph, supra, 34 Cal.3d at p. 951 (conc. opn. of Richardson, J.).) In the meantime, we have no choice but to obey the high court and reverse this judgment. Baxter, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

County of Los Angeles v. Ballerino

99 Cal. 593 · California Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1893

Humphrey, 24 Mich. 170 ; Lefferts v. Board of Supervisors, 21 Wis. 688 ; Milwaukee Iron Co. v. … S. 616 ; Huntington v. Palmer, 7 Sawy. 355 ; National Bank v. Kimball, 103 U. S. 732 ; Montgomery v.

Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

34 Cal. 4th 733 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2004

(See Citizens for Hatton Canyon v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Turlock Irrigation District v. Williams

76 Cal. 360 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1888

Supervisors Yolo County, 47 Cal. 223 ; Dean v. Davis, 51 Cal. 406 ; People v. Williams, 56 Cal. 647 ; People v. La Rue, 67 Cal. 526 ; Reclamation District v. Hagar, 66 Cal. 54 . … (Hagar v. Rec. Dist., 111 U. S. 705 , citing Mobile Co. v. Kimball, 102 U. S. 691 -704.)

Fischer v. State Bar

6 Cal. 2d 671 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1936

6 Cal.2d 671 (1936) SIDNEY FISCHER, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. L. A. No. 15593. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. June 30, 1936. Sidney Fischer, in pro. per., for Petitioner. … conveyance action was filed, petitioner told him that he was already in the illegal transaction and that he had better sign the answer which set up the purported transfers. [1] The committee recommended disbarment and the Board

Silberman v. Industrial Accident Commission

21 Cal. 2d 609 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1943

Co. v. Industrial Acc. … The petitioner then, under a separate contract with the Dulien Steel Company, bound himself to deliver the rails on board the trucks.

Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.

12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 615 · California Supreme Court · May 6, 2004

(See Ballard v. … WE CONCUR: GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, and BROWN, JJ. Concurring Opinion by MORENO, J.

Bucknall v. Story

46 Cal. 589 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

protest by the plaintiffs to the defendant, as a Tax Collector, for an assessment on their land for the widening of Kearny street, in San Francisco; the .property in question being situated within the district defined by the Board … Hogan , and Falkner v. Hunt.) “We are not disposed to disturb those decisions upon this point.” These decisions, except McMillan v.

In Re Estate of Johnston

197 Cal. 28 · California Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1925

The power to build County hospitals and almshouses cannot now be exer-¡ cised by the Board of Supervisors without the sanction of the State Board of Charities. j “Legislative control over institutions for the care of in-; … The case of Chalfant v.

People v. Santana

56 Cal. 4th 999 · California Supreme Court · Jun 10, 2013

(See People v. … (See People v.

Henry v. Southern Pacific Railroad

50 Cal. 176 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

(Hall v. Sac. V. R. R. Co., 14 Cal. 387 .) … In Ryan v. N. Y. C. R.

People v. Zirbes

6 Cal. 2d 425 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1936

(People v. Van Cleave, 208 Cal. 295, 300 [ 280 Pac. 983 ]; People v. Darling, 120 Cal. … Upon this subject the District Court of Appeal in the case of People v. Brown, 71 Cal.

Abbott v. Jack

136 Cal. 510 · California Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1902

Sanger, 130 Cal. 434 ; Carpy v. … Code, secs. 322, 324; Duke v. Huntington, 130 Cal. 274 ; Baines v. *514 Babcock, 95 Cal. 593 ; Moore v. Boyd, 74 Cal. 174 ; O’Connor v. Witherby, 111 Cal. 528 .) R». E.