Case law

Hunt v. Davis

135 Cal. 31 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1901

The case, we think, comes directly, within the authority of Shorb v. … (Shorb v. Beaudry, 56 Cal. 450 , and Charter v. San Francisco etc. Co., 19 Cal. 247 , there cited; Cornell v. Corbin, 64 Cal. 200 ; Kohl v. Lilienthal, 81 Cal. 397 ; Behlow v. Fischer, 102 Cal. 214 -215.)

California Employment Commission v. Kovacevich

27 Cal. 2d 546 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1946

In Stuart v. … Under the principles governing the decision in the cases of North Whittier Heights Citrus Assn. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, 109 F.2d 76 , and California Employment Com. v.

Perumean v. Wills

8 Cal. 2d 578 · California Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1937

(Burns v. Sennett & Miller, 99 Cal. 363, 373 [ 33 Pac. 916 ], Hennesey v. Bingham, 125 Cal. 627, 635 [ 58 Pac. 200 ], Longuy v. La Societe Fran caise, 52 Cal. App. 370, 375 [ 198 Pac. 1011 ], and Thomas v. Southern Pac. … (Ellis v. Burns *584 Valley School Dist., 128 Cal. App. 550 [ 18 Pac. (2d) 79 ]; Hack v. Sacramento City Junior College Dist., 131 Cal. App. 444, 448 [ 21 Pac. (2d) 477 ]; Underhill v. Alameda E. School Dist., 133 Cal.

Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.

185 Cal. 386 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1921

In Sanchez v. Grace M. E. … Other decisions favoring the same rule are Brown v. Tabor, 103 Iowa, 1 , [ 72 N. W. 416 ]; Overland Machine Co. v. Alpenfels, 30 Colo. 171 , [69 Pac. 574]; Harris v. Elliott, 10 Pet. 25 , [ 9 L.

Semi-Tropic Spiritualists' Ass'n v. Johnson

163 Cal. 639 · California Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1912

This implies an agreement to pay a quantum, meruit (Toomy v. Dunphy, 86 Cal. 643 , [ 25 Pac. 130 ].) … (Amestoy v. Electric Rapid Transit Co., 95 Cal. 314 , [ 30 Pac. 550 ]; Matteson v. Wagoner, 147 Cal. 742 , [ 82 Pac. 436 ].) Judged then by this rule the complaint was good as against a general demurrer.

Ward v. Taggart

51 Cal. 2d 736 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1959

(See Brown v. Coates, 253 F.2d 36, 39-40 ; Briggs v. Rodriguez, 236 S.W.2d 510, 514-516 (Tex. Civ.App); 30 Tex.L.Rev. 371, 372.) In Crogan v. … In Steiner v.

Wiener v. Southcoast Childcare Centers, Inc.

12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 615 · California Supreme Court · May 6, 2004

(See Ballard v. … WE CONCUR: GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, and BROWN, JJ. Concurring Opinion by MORENO, J.

People v. Lynch

50 Cal. 4th 693 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 2010

(Uttecht v. Brown, supra, 551 U.S. at p. 18 ; see Wainwright v. … (Uttecht v. Brown, supra, 551 U.S. at p. 18 .)

Escobedo v. State of California

35 Cal. 2d 870 · California Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1950

Lampton, 32 Cal.2d 226 [ 195 P.2d 792 , 10 A.L.R.2d 826 ]); liquor licensee (Covert v. State Board of Equalization, 29 Cal.2d 125 [ 173 P.2d 545 ]); horse trainer (Carroll v. … Cases such as Surtman v. Secretary of State, 309 Mich. 270 [ 15 N.W.2d 471 ]; Nulter v. State Road Commission, 119 W.Va. 312 [ 193 S.E. 549 , 194 S.E. 270 ]; LaPlante v. State Board of Public Roads, 47 R.

Broadman v. Commission on Judical Performance

77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 408 · California Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1998

In *1102 Pickering, supra, 391 U.S. 563 , a board of education had dismissed a high school teacher for publicly criticizing the board’s allocation of school funds between athletics and education and the board’s method of … (See, e.g., Perry v. Sindermann (1972) 408 U.S. 593 [ 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 ] [refusal to rehire teacher who had testified before state legislature]; Mt. Healthy City Board of Ed. v.

Bosqui v. City of San Bernardino

2 Cal. 2d 747 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1935

E. 732 ] ; Board of Education of Earlville Community High School Dist. No. 380 v. Board of Education of Non-High School Dist. of La Salle Co., 343 Ill. 464 [ 175 N. E. 810 ].) … (Abeel v. Clark, 84 Cal. 226, 230 [ 24 Pac. 383 ]; People v. Jordan, 172 Cal. 391, 397 [ 156 Pac. 451 ].)

Williams v. Long

139 Cal. 186 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1903

(Gray v. Tubbs, 43 Cal. 363 ; Martin v. … (Hannan v. McNickle, 82 Cal. 126 ; Rhorer v. Bila, 83 Cal. 54 .) This disposes of all the points made on the motion for a nonsuit, and we think it was properly denied.

People v. Gonzalez

60 Cal. 4th 533 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 2014

Only the Legislature and not the courts may make conduct criminal.‖ (In re 3 Brown (1973) 9 Cal.3d 612, 624; see People v. Chun (2009) 45 Cal.4th 1172, 1183; § 6.) … Blockburger v.

Loftus v. Dehail

133 Cal. 214 · California Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1901

Venturesome boys, and even girls, make playgrounds of unfinished buildings, climb perilous heights, and scamper over insecure boards and rafters. … It has recently received the detailed consideration of this court, in Peters v.

State v. Steamship Constitution

42 Cal. 578 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1872

(People v. Raymond, supra, and cases there cited.) … Board of Wardens, four years later, the same question came directly before the Court in reference to the local laws of the port of Philadelphia concerning pilots.

Martin Ship Service Co. v. City of LA

34 Cal. 2d 793 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1950

(National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 37-41 [ 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 ]; United States v. … (South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros., 303 U.S. 177, 184-185 [ 58 S.Ct. 510 , 82 L.Ed. 734 ]; Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of R. R.

Sei Fujii v. State of California

38 Cal. 2d 718 · California Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1952

Brown, Attorneys General, Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, and John F. Hassler, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. Ralph G. … City of Los Angeles, 33 Cal.2d 453, 468 [ 202 P.2d 38 , 7 A.L.R.2d 990 ]; Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing Board, 31 Cal.2d 401, 415 [ 189 P.2d 17 , 3 A.L.R.2d 90 ]; Del Mar Canning Co. v.

Steiner v. Rowley

35 Cal. 2d 713 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1950

Young, 9 Cal.App.2d 545 [ 50 P.2d 495 ]; Smith v. Brown, 1 Cal.App.2d 492, 495 [ 36 P.2d 1081 ]; see Early v. Owens, 109 Cal.App. 489, 494 [ 293 P. 136 ]). … Co. v Eyraud, 208 Cal. *720 566 [ 283 P. 65 ]; Mix v. Yoakum, 200 Cal. 681 [ 254 P. 557 ]; Hayter v. Fulmor, 66 Cal.App.2d 554 [152 P.2d 746]; Brooks v. City of Monterey, 106 Cal.App. 649 [ 290 P. 540 ]; Snyder v.

City of Oakland v. Brock

8 Cal. 2d 639 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1937

Jur., p. 804; Korth v. City of Portland, 123 Or. 180 [ 261 Pac. 895 , 58 A. L. R. 665]; Sterett & Oberle Packing Co. v. City of Portland, 79 Or. 260 [ 154 Pac. 410 ]; State v. Nelson, 66 Minn. 166 [ 68 N. … Proc.; Nougues v. Douglass, 7 Cal. 65 ; U’Ren v. State Board of Control, 31 Cal. App. 6, 12 [ 159 Pac. 615 ]; 59 Cor.

Watson v. Sutro

86 Cal. 500 · California Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1890

(Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. Y. 359 .) In other words, one who acts through another will be presumed to know all that the agent learns during the transaction, whether it is actually communicated to him or not. … (Williamson v. Brown, 15 N. Y. 359 .) This constructive notice, when it exists, is irrebuttable. It is not merely prima facie evidence, for then it could be rebutted.