Case law

Hall v. Bru

216 Cal. 153 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1932

M'. on March 14th; that because of a delay in traffic they were unable to board the 1:20 P. M. ferry-boat and were compelled to take the 1:40 P. … The defendants rely on Fulweiler v. Hog’s Back Con. Min. Co., 83 Cal. 126 [ 23 Pac. 65 ], in support of their position.

Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase

3 Cal. 4th 1 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1992

Joint Board (1959) 52 Cal.2d 568, 589 [ 343 P.2d 23 ].) … (Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. L.A. Joint Board, supra, 52 Cal.2d at p. 589 ; Nogueiro v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, supra, 203 Cal.App.3d at p. 1195 ; Ray Wilson Co. v.

People v. Babylon

39 Cal. 3d 719 · California Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1985

(People v. Rossi, supra, 18 Cal.3d 295 ; In re Estrada, supra, 63 Cal.2d 740 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 172 , 408 P.2d 948 ]. See, also, Governing Board v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 558 P.2d 1 ].) … (People v. Rossi, supra, 18 Cal.3d 295, 301-302 ; In re Estrada, supra, 63 Cal.2d 740, 744-745 . See also Governing Board v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; People v.

State Bar v. Langert

43 Cal. 2d 636 · California Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1954

(Spears v. … As was said in Spears v.

Williams v. Long

139 Cal. 186 · California Supreme Court · May 29, 1903

(Gray v. Tubbs, 43 Cal. 363 ; Martin v. … (Hannan v. McNickle, 82 Cal. 126 ; Rhorer v. Bila, 83 Cal. 54 .) This disposes of all the points made on the motion for a nonsuit, and we think it was properly denied.

Broadman v. Commission on Judical Performance

77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 408 · California Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1998

In *1102 Pickering, supra, 391 U.S. 563 , a board of education had dismissed a high school teacher for publicly criticizing the board’s allocation of school funds between athletics and education and the board’s method of … (See, e.g., Perry v. Sindermann (1972) 408 U.S. 593 [ 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 ] [refusal to rehire teacher who had testified before state legislature]; Mt. Healthy City Board of Ed. v.

Adoption of Pior

43 Cal. 2d 472 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1954

43 Cal.2d 472 (1954) Adoption of DONNA LYNN PIOR, a Minor, RALPH BENNETT et al., Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE OF THE COUNTY OF FRESNO, Respondent. S. F. No. 19046. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. … Brown, Attorney General, Richard L. Mayers, Deputy Attorney General, Clock, Waestman & Clock, Loeb & Loeb, Edward W. Sheridan and Herman F. Selvin as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent. *473 TRAYNOR, J.

Rojas v. Superior Court

15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 643 · California Supreme Court · Jul 12, 2004

Co. v. … (People v.

Hagle v. Hagle

74 Cal. 608 · California Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1888

(Hagle v. Hagle, 68 Cal. 588 .) … It is claimed that the decision in Hagle v.

Ex Parte Hayden

147 Cal. 649 · California Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1905

(Young v. Commonwealth, 101 Va. 853 , [ 45 S. E. 327 ]; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366 , [18 Sup. Ct. 383].) … .), .that when apples are shipped to the markets .of this state, properly labeled “Apples grown in Santa Cruz County,” because of their known cleanliness and freedom from disease, such apples are permitted to pass local boards

City of Oakland v. Brock

8 Cal. 2d 639 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1937

Jur., p. 804; Korth v. City of Portland, 123 Or. 180 [ 261 Pac. 895 , 58 A. L. R. 665]; Sterett & Oberle Packing Co. v. City of Portland, 79 Or. 260 [ 154 Pac. 410 ]; State v. Nelson, 66 Minn. 166 [ 68 N. … Proc.; Nougues v. Douglass, 7 Cal. 65 ; U’Ren v. State Board of Control, 31 Cal. App. 6, 12 [ 159 Pac. 615 ]; 59 Cor.

McKown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 868 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 2002

Opinion BROWN, J. This is the third in a series of recent cases in which we have been called upon to consider the reach of our decisions in Privette v. … In Hooker v.

People v. Gonzalez

60 Cal. 4th 533 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 2014

Only the Legislature and not the courts may make conduct criminal.‖ (In re 3 Brown (1973) 9 Cal.3d 612, 624; see People v. Chun (2009) 45 Cal.4th 1172, 1183; § 6.) … Blockburger v.

Moeller v. Superior Court

16 Cal. 4th 1124 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1997

(Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531, 540 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 897 , 522 P.2d 305 ].) … Baxter, J., and Brown, J., concurred.

Anderson v. Citizens Sav. & Tr. Co.

185 Cal. 386 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1921

In Sanchez v. Grace M. E. … Other decisions favoring the same rule are Brown v. Tabor, 103 Iowa, 1 , [ 72 N. W. 416 ]; Overland Machine Co. v. Alpenfels, 30 Colo. 171 , [69 Pac. 574]; Harris v. Elliott, 10 Pet. 25 , [ 9 L.

People v. Un Dong

106 Cal. 83 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1895

The questions asked were not only in large part violative of the defendant’s right to have his cross-examination confined to the subject matter of his testimony in chief (People v. O’Brien, 66 Cal. 603 ; People v. … (People v. Wells, 100 Cal. 459 .)

People v. Morante

84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 665 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 1999

Flores then boarded a flight to Houston and in that city checked into a Days Inn hotel, from which location he paged defendant, who remained in California. … Mosk, J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied July 21, 1999. 1 Miranda v.

Serova v. Sony Music Entertainment

California Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2022

(Board of Trustees, State Univ. of N. Y. v. Fox (1989) 492 U.S. 469, 474.) This principle derives from Riley v. … (dis. opn. of Brown, J.); id. at pp. 979–980 (dis. opn. of Brown, J.)

Perumean v. Wills

8 Cal. 2d 578 · California Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1937

(Burns v. Sennett & Miller, 99 Cal. 363, 373 [ 33 Pac. 916 ], Hennesey v. Bingham, 125 Cal. 627, 635 [ 58 Pac. 200 ], Longuy v. La Societe Fran caise, 52 Cal. App. 370, 375 [ 198 Pac. 1011 ], and Thomas v. Southern Pac. … (Ellis v. Burns *584 Valley School Dist., 128 Cal. App. 550 [ 18 Pac. (2d) 79 ]; Hack v. Sacramento City Junior College Dist., 131 Cal. App. 444, 448 [ 21 Pac. (2d) 477 ]; Underhill v. Alameda E. School Dist., 133 Cal.

People v. Toney

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 577 · California Supreme Court · Jan 22, 2004

(People v. Robles, supra, at p. 1111; People v. Castenada (2000) 23 Cal.4th 743, 747 [ 97 Cal.Rptr.2d 906 , 3 P.3d 278 ].) … In Ramos v.