Case law

In Re Gallego

77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 132 · California Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1998

Petitioner’s judgment of conviction and sentence of death was affirmed on appeal in 1990 (People v. … Petitioner asserts that his “plenary” investigation was required by McCleskey v.

Gileo v. Southern Pacific Co.

44 Cal. 2d 539 · California Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1955

The cars were being built in accordance with a resolu-' tion adopted by defendant’s board of directors which provided for the acquisition of 5,000 new cars and for their assignment to defendant and a subsidiary, the Texas … Co. v. White, 243 U.S. 188, 192 [ 37 S.Ct. 247 , 61 L.Ed. 667 ]; Raymond v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co., 243 U.S. 43, 45 [ 37 S.Ct. 268 , 61 L.Ed. 583 ]; see Pedersen v. Delaware, L. & W. R.

Ward v. Crane

118 Cal. 676 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1897

Our conclusion is not inconsistent with the case of Eaton v. Malatesta, 92 Cal. 75 , cited by appellant. … In Tunis v. Lakeport etc.

People v. Mammilato

168 Cal. 207 · California Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1914

(People v. Russell, 46 Cal. 121 .) … (People v. Crews, 102 Cal. 174 , [ 36 Pac. 367 ].)

Ex parte Mount

66 Cal. 448 · California Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1885

(Barbier v. Connolly, Supreme Court United States, Jan. 5, 1885; 5 Supreme Court Rep. 357.) … In the case of Ex parte Walters, 65 Cal. 269 , the court said: “ It is very clear to us that the foregoing provisions (§§ 11 and 12, art. xi., Constitution), give to the Board of Supervisors the *451 power to regulate the

In re Ward

64 Cal. 2d 672 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1966

(Neal v. … (People v. Brown, 29 Cal.2d 555, 558 [1] [ 176 P.2d 929 ].) (4) Although section 654 of the Penal Code prohibits double punishment, it does not prohibit double conviction.

Murray v. Industrial Accident Commission

216 Cal. 340 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1932

Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 180 Cal. 497, 499 [ 181 Pac. 788 ].) … (Hendrickson v. Industrial Acc. Com., 215 Cal. 82 [ 8 Pac. (2d) 833 ].)

Cunha v. Superior Court

217 Cal. 249 · California Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1933

The petitioner was chief counsel for the defendant in the ease of People v. James R. Kelly, commenced and tried in the respondent court. … As the court may not be called upon to determine questions which have become purely academic and moot (Wright v. Board of Public Works, 163 Cal. 328 [ 125 Pac. 353 ]; 2 Cal.

Adams v. Superior Court

12 Cal. 3d 55 · California Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1974

Board of Election (1969) 394 U.S. 802, 809 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 739, 745-746 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 ]; McGowan v. … The prescribed qualifications must, however, reasonably relate to the efficiency and competence of the jurors, and must be equally administered. ( Brown v.

People v. Jones

54 Cal. 4th 1 · California Supreme Court · May 7, 2012

Brown, supra, 31 Cal.4th at p. 570; see also People v. Brasure (2008) 42 Cal.4th 1037, 1069-1070 (Brasure) [same].) … (Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at pp. 403-404; People v. Bolden (2002) 29 Cal.4th 515, 567.)

Michael G. v. Superior Court

44 Cal. 3d 283 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1988

(Bailey v. … (People v. Williams (1976) 16 Cal.3d 663, 667 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 888 , 547 P.2d 1000 ]; Palermo v.

Sutter-Yuba Investment Co. v. Waste

21 Cal. 2d 781 · California Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1943

(Stockton School District v. Wright, 134 Cal. 64 [ 66 P. 34 ]; Marshall v. Foote, 81 Cal.App. 98 [ 252 P. 1075 ].) *789 In the case of People v. … (Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co., 10 Cal.2d 442 [ 74 P.2d 745 ]; People v. Mulhollmd, 16 Cal.2d 62 [ 104 P.2d 1045 ]; People v.

People v. Kipp

113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 27 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2001

Indian children were required to attend boarding schools where Indian languages could not be spoken. The BIA encouraged the Blackfeet to farm their land, but the land was generally unsuitable for farming. … J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Kremer, J., * concurred.

Farber v. Olkon

40 Cal. 2d 503 · California Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1953

In Ybarra v. … (Ales v. Ryan, 8 Cal.2d 82 [ 64 P.2d 409 ] ; Brown v. Shortlidge, 98 Cal.App. 352 [ 277 P. 134 ] ; Moore v. Steen, 102 Cal.App. 723 [ 283 P. 833 ] ; Armstrong v. Wallace, 8 Cal.App.2d 429 [ 47 P.2d 740 ] ; Meyer v.

Carter v. Chotiner

210 Cal. 288 · California Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1930

(County of Los Angeles v. Hollywood Cemetery Assn., 124 Cal. 344 [ 71 Am. St. Rep. 75 , 57 Pac. 153 ].) … Jur. 284, see. 20; Robinson v. Baugh, 31 Mich. 290, 293 ; Davis v. Spragg, 72 W. Va. 672, 676 [47 L. R. A. (N. S.) 173, 79 S.

Los Angeles & Arizona Land Co. v. Marr

187 Cal. 126 · California Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1921

(Werner v. Graham, supra; Hannah v. Southern Pac. R. R. Co. (Cal. App.), 192 Pac. 304 .) … (Brown v. Wrightman, 5 Cal. App. 391, 393 , [ 90 Pac. 467 ]; Quatman v. McCray, 128 Cal. 285 , [ 60 Pac. 855 ].)

People v. Babylon

39 Cal. 3d 719 · California Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1985

(People v. Rossi, supra, 18 Cal.3d 295 ; In re Estrada, supra, 63 Cal.2d 740 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 172 , 408 P.2d 948 ]. See, also, Governing Board v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 558 P.2d 1 ].) … (People v. Rossi, supra, 18 Cal.3d 295, 301-302 ; In re Estrada, supra, 63 Cal.2d 740, 744-745 . See also Governing Board v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 528 P.2d 1 ]; People v.

Patterson v. People

58 Cal. 2d 848 · California Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1962

(Drummey *851 v. State Board of Funeral Directors, 13 Cal.2d 75, 80 [2] [ 87 P.2d 848 ] ; Litchfield v. County of Marin, 130 Cal.App.2d 806, 813 [7] et seq. [ 280 P.2d 117 ].) … Proc., § 1963, subd. 15; People v. Downer, 57 Cal.2d 800, 817 [ 22 Cal.Rptr. 347 , 372 P.2d 107 ]; People v.

County of Butte v. Dept. of Water Resources

California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 2022

(Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564.) … Significantly, the Ninth Circuit addressed and rejected the very approach to preemption adopted in the majority opinion: “The [Water] Board urges that we read California v.

Wemyss v. Superior Court

38 Cal. 2d 616 · California Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1952

(See Brown v. Superior Court, 34 Cal.2d 559 [ 212 P.2d 878 ]; Strauss v. Superior Court, 36 Cal.2d 396 [ 224 P.2d 726 ]; Carnation Co. v. Superior Court, 96 Cal.App.2d 138 [ 214 P.2d 552 ].) … In Scott v.