Case law

People v. Lumbley

8 Cal. 2d 752 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1937

The pardon was granted upon the recommendation of the board of pardons and paroles five years after his discharge from prison. … Code, see. 1018; People v. Bacciocco, 81 Cal. App. 19 [ 251 Pac. 817 ]; People v. Manriquez, 188 Cal. 602 [ 206 Pac. 63 , 20 A. L. R. 1441]; People v. Cosgrove, 48 Cal. App. 710 [ 192 Pac. 165 ]; People v.

Southern California Acoustics Co. v. C. V. Holder, Inc.

71 Cal. 2d 719 · California Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1969

(Klose v. Sequoia Union High *723 School Dist. (1953) 118 Cal.App.2d 636, 641 [ 258 P.2d 515 ] ; Norcross v. Winters (1962) 209 Cal.App.2d 207, 217 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 821 ], See Williams v. … (See Bermite Powder Co. v. Franchise Tax Board (1952) 38 Cal.2d 700, 703 [ 242 P.2d 9 ]; Paxton v. Paxton (1907) 150 Cal. 667, 670 [ 89 P. 1083 ]; Civ. Code, §3523.)

County of Yolo v. Knight

70 Cal. 431 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1886

And in Forbes v. … The rule is stated in RicJcetson v.

Green v. Barney

4 Cal. Unrep. 665 · California Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1894

contract had not been rescinded, or that the rescission thereof was owing to a default of the plaintiff, whereby defendant suffered damages in a sum equal to, and sufficient to cancel, the payments made by Bray: Phelps v. … Brown, 95 Cal. 572 , 30 Pac. 774 , and cases there cited.

County of Butte v. Dept. of Water Resources

California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 2022

(Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564.) … Significantly, the Ninth Circuit addressed and rejected the very approach to preemption adopted in the majority opinion: “The [Water] Board urges that we read California v.

Bashore v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.

152 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1907

(Board of Education v. Com *4 mon Council, 128 Cal. 369, [60 Pac. 976 ].) “A mandamus is only granted in the sound discretion of the court. … (People v. Jeroloman, 139 N. Y. 14 , [ 34 N. E. 726 ].)

Abbott v. Cooper

218 Cal. 425 · California Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1933

In Boaz v. … (Gomez v.

People v. Smith

106 Cal. 73 · California Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1895

(People v. Gray, 66 Cal. 271 ; People v. Barnes, 48 Cal. 551 ; People v. Hartman, 62 Cal. 562 ; People v. McNutt, 64 Cal. 116 .) … (Brown v. Commonwealth, 76 Pa. St. 319; Commonwealth v. Ferrigan, 44 Pa. St. 386; Fernandez v. State, 4 Tex. App. 419; Heath v. Commonwealth, 1 Rob. (Va.) 735; People v. Foley, 64 Mich. 148 ; People v.

Riedman v. Brison

217 Cal. 383 · California Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1933

(Wright v. Jordan, supra; Reclamation Dist. v. Superior Court, 171 Cal. 672 [ 154 Pac. 845 ].) … For like holdings in similar cases, see People v. City of Los Angeles, 154 Cal. *387 220, 228, 229 [ 97 Pac. 311 ], Allen v. Board of Trustees, 157 Cal. 720, 723 [ 109 Pac. 486 ], and Henshaw v.

City of Barstow v. Mojave Water Agency

99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 294 · California Supreme Court · Aug 21, 2000

{Jordan v. … (See State of California v.

Farber v. Olkon

40 Cal. 2d 503 · California Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1953

In Ybarra v. … (Ales v. Ryan, 8 Cal.2d 82 [ 64 P.2d 409 ] ; Brown v. Shortlidge, 98 Cal.App. 352 [ 277 P. 134 ] ; Moore v. Steen, 102 Cal.App. 723 [ 283 P. 833 ] ; Armstrong v. Wallace, 8 Cal.App.2d 429 [ 47 P.2d 740 ] ; Meyer v.

City & County of San Francisco v. Spring Valley Water Works

39 Cal. 473 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

The Chief Engineer of the Fire Department, under the direction of the Board of Supervisors of said City and County of San Francisco, shall have the right to tap any pipes so laid down, and connect hydrants there *479 with … It is objected to this averment that having alleged the facts the plaintiff cannot rely upon the estoppel—and the case of Megerle v. Ashe ( 33 Cal. 84 ) is relied upon as an authority upon this point.

Acosta v. Southern California Rapid Transit District

2 Cal. 3d 19 · California Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1970

Plaintiff waited for about eight or nine other passengers to board the bus and then she did so and paid the fare. … Plaintiff, the last passenger to board the bus, had just reached the first set of seats which face the front of the bus when the driver applied the brakes.

People v. . Scott

15 Cal. 4th 1188 · California Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1997

Corbin (1990) 495 U.S. 508, 516, fn. 7 [ 110 S.Ct. 2084, 2091 , 109 L.Ed.2d 548 ], overruled on other grounds in United States v. Dixon, supra, 509 U.S. at p. 712 [ 113 S.Ct. at p. 2864 ], quoting Brown v. … (People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 445 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].) The prosecutor expressly did not claim defendant had actually killed before.

Engebretson v. Gay

158 Cal. 30 · California Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1910

In State v. Kerr, 8 Mo. … The question was determined by the supreme court of Indiana in favor of such a provision for attorneys’ fees in Brown v. Central Bermuidez Co., 162 Ind. 452 , [ 89 N.

In re Ward

64 Cal. 2d 672 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1966

(Neal v. … (People v. Brown, 29 Cal.2d 555, 558 [1] [ 176 P.2d 929 ].) (4) Although section 654 of the Penal Code prohibits double punishment, it does not prohibit double conviction.

Murray v. Industrial Accident Commission

216 Cal. 340 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1932

Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 180 Cal. 497, 499 [ 181 Pac. 788 ].) … (Hendrickson v. Industrial Acc. Com., 215 Cal. 82 [ 8 Pac. (2d) 833 ].)

Cunha v. Superior Court

217 Cal. 249 · California Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1933

The petitioner was chief counsel for the defendant in the ease of People v. James R. Kelly, commenced and tried in the respondent court. … As the court may not be called upon to determine questions which have become purely academic and moot (Wright v. Board of Public Works, 163 Cal. 328 [ 125 Pac. 353 ]; 2 Cal.

Adams v. Superior Court

12 Cal. 3d 55 · California Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1974

Board of Election (1969) 394 U.S. 802, 809 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 739, 745-746 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 ]; McGowan v. … The prescribed qualifications must, however, reasonably relate to the efficiency and competence of the jurors, and must be equally administered. ( Brown v.

Agnew v. City of Culver City

51 Cal. 2d 474 · California Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1959

Plaintiff is an electrical contractor licensed by the Contractors’ State License Board under section 7000 et seq. of the Business and Professions Code. … In the recent case of Agnew v.