Case law

In Re Cox

3 Cal. 3d 205 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1970

Code, § § 51, 52.)” 6 ( 37 Cal.2d at p. 716 ; see Tarbox v. Board of Supervisors (1958) 163 Cal. App.2d 373, 378 [ 329 P.2d 553 ].) … Brown v. Louisiana (1966) 383 U.S. 131,143,147-148 [ 15 L.Ed.2d 637, 646, 648-649 , 86 S.Ct. 719 ]. (Brennan, J., concurring in judgment); NAACP v. Button (1962) 371 U.S. 415, 432 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 405, 417 , 83 S.Ct. 328 ].)

People v. Smith

25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 554 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2005

(See People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at pp. 538-539.) … J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred.

Abbott v. Cooper

218 Cal. 425 · California Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1933

In Boaz v. … (Gomez v.

Murphy v. Clayton

113 Cal. 153 · California Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1896

(Olcott v. Bynum, 17 Wall. 44 ; Buck v. Swazey, 35 Me. 48 ; 56 Am. Dec. 681 ; Woodside v. Hewel, 109 Cal. 484 ; Somers v. Overhulser, 67 Cal. 237 ; Davis v. Baugh, 59 Cal. 573 ; Case v. Codding, 38 Cal. 193 ; Dikeman v. … (Brown v. Bowen, 30 N. Y. 519 ; 86 Am. Dec. 406 ; Plumb v. Cattaraugus County Mut. Ins. Co., 18 N. Y. 392 ; 72 Am. Dec. 526 .)

Savings Bank of San Diego v. Barrett

126 Cal. 413 · California Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1899

(See, also, Duncan v. Maryland Sav. Inst., 10 Gill & J. 299; Shoemaker v. Smith, 37 Ind. 123 ; Neel v. Beach, 92 Pa. St. 226; New England Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Phillips, 141 Mass. 540 .) … (Barnitz v. Beverly, 163 U.

People v. Boss

210 Cal. 245 · California Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1930

In People v. … W. 849 ]; State v. Brown, 7 Or. 186 . The latter case presents facts not unlike those of the instant case.

Piper v. Big Pine School District

193 Cal. 664 · California Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1924

(Ward v. Flood, supra; Wysinger v. Crookshank, 82 Cal. 558 [ 23 Pac. 54 ]; Crawford v. School District etc., 68 Or. 388 [Ann. Cas. 1915C, 477, and note, 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 147, 137 Pac. 217]; Lehew v. … (People v. Bray, 105 Cal. 344 [27 L. R. A. 158, 38 Pac. 731 ]; Anderson v. Mathews, 174 Cal. 537 [ 163 Pac. 902 ].)

Acosta v. Southern California Rapid Transit District

2 Cal. 3d 19 · California Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1970

Plaintiff waited for about eight or nine other passengers to board the bus and then she did so and paid the fare. … Plaintiff, the last passenger to board the bus, had just reached the first set of seats which face the front of the bus when the driver applied the brakes.

People v. Newman

5 Cal. 3d 48 · California Supreme Court · May 28, 1971

(People v. White, 71 Cal.2d 80, 82 [ 75 Cal.Rptr. 208 , 450 P.2d 600 ]; People v. Francis, 71 Cal.2d 66, 73 [ 75 Cal.Rptr. 199 , 450 P.2d 591 ]; People v. … Jackson, 59 Cal.2d 468 , 469 [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 329 , 381 P.2d 1 ]; People v. Brown, 55 Cal.2d 64, 68 [ 9 Cal.Rptr. 816 , 357 P. 2d 1072 ]; People v.

Christensen v. Superior Court

54 Cal. 3d 868 · California Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1991

A decision is not authority for a proposition not considered in the court's opinion. ( People v. Myers (1987) 43 Cal.3d 250, 265, fn. 5 [ 233 Cal. Rptr. 264 , 729 P.2d 698 ]; see also Brown v. … (See, e.g., IFS Industries, Inc. v. Stephens (1984) 159 Cal. App.3d 740 [ 205 Cal. Rptr. 915 ]; Mount Vernon Memorial Park v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers (1978) 79 Cal. App.3d 874 [ 145 Cal.

People v. Erskine

247 Cal. Rptr. 3d 86 · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2019

Thomas Wegman, a psychologist with a board certification in neuropsychology, reviewed Erskine’s records and interviewed him in March 2004 over the course of about eight hours on two days to perform a neurological assessment … (People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 537, fn. 7, revd. on other grounds sub nom. California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538; see also People v. Kipp (1998) 18 Cal.4th 349, 379 (Kipp) [same].)

In Re Smith

193 Cal. 337 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1924

In determining any such per centum proper allowance may be made for items of board, lodging, or other consideration or privilege, or for differences arising by reason of rating the compensation otherwise than according to … The supreme court of the United States, in Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, 261 U. S. 525 [24 A. L. R. 1238, 67 L. Ed. 785 , 43 Sup. Ct.

Equilon Enterprises, LLC v. Consumer Cause, Inc.

29 Cal. 4th 53 · California Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2002

(State of South Dakota v. Brown (1978) 20 Cal.3d 765, 775 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 758 , 576 P.2d 473 ]; see also People v. Ledesma (1997) 16 Cal.4th 90, 101 [ 65 Cal.Rptr.2d 610 , 939 P.2d 1310 ].) … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred. The acronym was coined by Penelope Ganan and George W. Pring, professors at the University of Denver.

People v. Benavides

24 Cal. Rptr. 3d 507 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 2005

Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 397-398 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ]). … People v. Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at pp. 398-400.) D.

Johnson v. Clark

7 Cal. 2d 529 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1936

(Od ell v. Moss, supra.) … (Odell v. Moss, supra; Brison v. Brison, 75 Cal. 525 [ 17 Pac. 689 , 7 Am. St. Rep. 189 ] ; Brown v. Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co., 209 Cal. 596, 597 [ 289 Pac. 613 ]; 12 Cal. Jur. 711, 818-820; sec. 2235, Civ. Code.)

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Gillespie

50 Cal. 3d 82 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1990

Compton v. Board of Trustees (1975) 49 Cal. App.3d 150, 158 [ 122 Cal. Rptr. 493 ] (per Kaus, P.J.) … Rptr. 912 ]; Brown v. Huntington Beach etc. Sch. Dist. (1971) 15 Cal. App.3d 640, 647 [ 93 Cal.

Conroy v. State Bar

53 Cal. 3d 495 · California Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1991

He claims “the case was not *505 ready to go before the Appeals Board” as it was not “ripe for adjudication.” … For example, in Hansen v.

People v. Talibdeen

119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 922 · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2002

Opinion BROWN, J. In People v. … (See People v. Stone (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 707, 717-718 [ 89 Cal.Rptr.2d 401 ] [appellate court may impose omitted state and county penalties]; People v.

Wichmann v. City of Placerville

147 Cal. 162 · California Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1905

Such was the decision of this court in Frank v. City and County of San Francisco, 21 Cal. 668, 696 . Such was the ease of Broughton v. Pensacola, 93 U. S. 266 ; Mt. Pleasant v. Beckwith, 100 U. S. 520 ; Shapleigh v. … Co., 66 Cal. 642 , 6 Pac. 744 , it was held that section 4045 of the Political Code, prescribing duties and powers of boards of supervisors, was superseded and repealed by the County Government Act, which was passed on the

McClure v. Alberti

190 Cal. 348 · California Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1923

(Pearsall v. Henry, 153 Cal. 314 -325 [ 95 Pac. 154, 159 ].) The record shows at the time John Q. … (Castagnino v. Balletta, 82 Cal. 250, 258 [ 23 Pac. 127 ].) The evidence fully supports the findings of the trial court, which in turn uphold the judgment.