Case law

Stockton Gas & Elec. Co. v. San Joaquin County

148 Cal. 313 · California Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1905

In Dundy v. … In City of *321 Chicago v.

Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.

99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 745 · California Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2000

BROWN, J., Concurring.— Although I agree with most of the majority’s reasoning, I write separately on the issue of apportioning arbitral costs. … (See, e.g., Williams v.

Bank of California v. Carter

15 Cal. 3d 623 · California Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1975

(Brown v. Colm (1974) 11 Cal.3d 639, 643 [ 114 Cal.Rptr. 128 , 522 P.2d 688 ]; Cobbs v. Grant (1972) 8 Cal.3d 229, 236 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 505 , 502 P.2d 1 ]; Lysick v. … (Mandel v. Cemetery Board (1960) 185 Cal.App.2d 583, 587 [ 8 Cal.Rptr. 342 ].) The executor could invest cash of the estate only in savings accounts (§ 585) or certain government securities (§§ 584, 584.1).

Schwartz-Torrance Investment Corp. v. Bakery & Confectionery Workers' Union

61 Cal. 2d 766 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1964

Thus in Hughes v. … In the light of this conclusion we need not consider defendant’s contention that jurisdiction to intervene in this dispute resides exclusively in the National Labor Relations Board.

Hannah v. Pogue

23 Cal. 2d 849 · California Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1944

(Roberts v. Brae, 5 Cal.2d 356 [ 54 P.2d 698 ]; Vowinckel v. N. Clark & Sons, 217 Cal. 258 [18 P.2d 58]; Moniz v. Peterman, 220 Cal. 429 [ 31 P.2d 353 ]; Board of Trustees v. … (Roberts v. Brae, supra, at 359 ; Vowinckel v. N. Clark & Sons, supra, at 260; Moniz v. Peterson, supra, at 435; Board of Trustees v. Miller, supra, at 105 ; Southern Counties Gas Co. v.

Jardine v. Superior Court

213 Cal. 301 · California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1931

Bank v. Durr, 257 U. S. 99 [ 66 L. Ed. 149 , 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 15, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes Supp.]; Swift v. San Francisco Stock & Exchange Board, 67 Cal. 567 [ 8 Pac. 94 ]; Clute v. … The decision upon which petitioner most strongly relies is Swift v. San Francisco Stock & Exchange. Board, supra.

Stockton Savings Bank v. Staples

98 Cal. 189 · California Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1893

Co. v. Clarkin, 14 Cal. 145 ; Evans v. Bailey, 66 Cal. 112 ; Hagar v. Board of Supervisors, 47 Cal. 222 ; People v. La Rue, 67 Cal. 526 ; Spelling on Private Corporation, secs. 203, 206.) … In answer to a similar objection in People v.

City of L.A. v. L.A. Farming & Milling Co.

152 Cal. 645 · California Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1908

Co. v. Los Angeles, 106 Cal. 237 , [ 39 Pac. 762 ]; City of Los Angeles v. Pomeroy, 124 Cal. 597 , [ 57 Pac. 585 ].) … In Hardin v. Jordan, 140 U. S. 371 , [11 Sup.

926 N. Ardmore Ave., LLC v. Cnty. of L. A.

219 Cal. Rptr. 3d 695 · California Supreme Court · Jun 29, 2017

(Thrifty Corp. v. … In United States v.

Reid v. Valley Restaurants, Inc.

48 Cal. 2d 606 · California Supreme Court · May 28, 1957

This presumption, however, is not conclusive, and any statement to the contrary in Lahn v. … Structural Pest Control Board, 135 Cal.App.2d 289 [ 287 P.2d 17 ], and any inferences to the contrary in any other case or cases are disapproved.

Fernandez v. Tormey

121 Cal. 515 · California Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1898

Code, sec. 2778, subd. 2; Oaks v. Scheifferly, 74 Cal. 478 ; Elder v. Kutner, 97 Cal. 490 ; Ide v. Spencer, 50 Vt. 293 ; Shepard v. Shepard, 6 Conn. 37 .) … (V ogan v. Caminetti, 65 Cal. 438 .)

Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & Converse

21 Cal. 2d 411 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1942

(Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. Rea, 184 Cal. 565 [ 194 P. 1024 ] ; Edward Barron Estate Co. v. Waterman, 32 Cal.App. 171 [ 162 P. 410 ] ; Lang v. Pacific Brewing etc. Co., 44 Cal.App. 618 [ 187 P. 81 ] ; Kurihara v. … (University Club v. Deakin, supra; Hiatt Investment Co. v.

Hall v. City of Los Angeles

19 Cal. 2d 198 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1941

(Kelso v. Board of Education, 42 Cal.App.2d 415, 422 [109 PaCal.2d 29]; Sandstoe v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 28 Cal.App.2d 215, 220 [82 PaCal.2d 216].)" … (Kelso v. Board of Education, supra; Sandstoe v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co., supra.)" "The principle underlying the rule is well stated in Decker v.

Estate of Sherman

46 Cal. 2d 534 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1956

KARP, Petitioner, v. HOPALONG CASSIDY, INC., Appellant; THEODORA LOIS SHERMAN et al., Respondents. Estate of HARRY A. SHERMAN, Deceased. JACOB H. KARP, Petitioner, v. … In Goad v.

People v. Alfaro

63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 433 · California Supreme Court · Aug 6, 2007

(Peo ple v. Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d at p. 448 .) 4. … (People v. Harris (2005) 37 Cal.4th 310, 365 [ 33 Cal.Rptr.3d 509 , 118 P.3d 545 ]; People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382 , *1331 401 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ] (Brown).)

Farrell v. Parkford

189 Cal. 540 · California Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1922

Notes]); or of all the lumber of the seller then on hand in a certain mill (Inman Bros. v. Dudley etc. Lumber Co., 146 Fed. 449 [ 76 C. C. A. 659 ]); or all of the coal in place in a certain ledge (Timlin v. … Brown, 158 Pa. St. 606 [ 28 Atl. 236 ]).

In Re Podesto

15 Cal. 3d 921 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1976

Browning (1975) 45 Cal.App.3d 125, 137-138 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 420 ] (quoting Kent v. United States (1966) 383 U.S. 541, 561 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 84, 97 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 ]).) … Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 18-19 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ], quoting Davey v. Southern Pacific Co. (1897) 116 Cal. 325, 329 [ 48 P. 117 ].)

Baldwin v. State of California

6 Cal. 3d 424 · California Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1972

(Johnson v. … (Brown v. Fifteenth Dist. Agr. Fair Assn. (1958) 159 Cal.App.2d 93 [323 P.2d *438 131].)

Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.

44 Cal. 3d 1103 · California Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1988

Md. 1974) 64 F.R.D. 586 , 590 & fn. 6; Morton v. Charles County Board of Education (D. … (See Young v. Haines (1986) 41 Cal.3d 883 [ 226 Cal.Rptr. 547 , 718 P.2d 909 ] [effect of fraudulent concealment by a physician]; Brown v.

Adams v. Murakami

54 Cal. 3d 105 · California Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1991

(Browning-Ferris Industries v. Kelco Disposal (1989) 492 U.S. 257, 287-289 [ 106 L.Ed.2d 219, 246-247 , 109 S.Ct. 2909, 2927 ] [conc, and dis. opn. of O’Connor, J.].) … (Green Oil Co. v. Hornsby, supra, 539 So.2d 218, 223 , italics in opinion, quoting Ridout’s Brown Service, Inc. v.