Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscal

10,000+ results

0.34s

  • Poak v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

    177 Cal. 190 · California Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1918

    Co. v. Gates, 135 Ill. App. 180 ; Peterson v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 211 Mo. 498 , [ 111 S. W. 37 ]; Patterson v. Westchester Elec. Ry. Co., 26 App. Div. 336 , [ 49 N. Y. Supp. 796 ].) … Co. v. Cusick, 60 Kan. 590 , [ 72 Am. St. Rep. 374 , 57 Pac. 519 ]; Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. Shaw, 110 Tenn. 467 , [ 75 S. W. 713 ]; Birmingham Union Ry. Co. v. Smith, 90 Ala. 60 , [ 24 Am. St.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation District

    211 Cal. 670 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1931

    Thus in Williston v. … Co. v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Easterbrook v. City & County of San Francisco

    5 Cal. Unrep. 341 · California Supreme Court · May 1, 1896

    The ease is, we think, brought within the spirit of the rule enunciated by the United States circuit court in Liebman v. City and County of San Francisco, 11 Saw. 147 , 24 Fed. 705 , and in Elberg v. San Luis Obispo Co. … Co. v. San Diego Co. (decided August 21, 1895), 112 Cal. 314 , 41 Pac. 423 , 44 Pac. 571 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rose v. Southern Trust Co.

    178 Cal. 580 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1918

    (Swafford v. Board of Education, 127 Cal. 484 , [ 59 Pac. 900 ].) … It was clearly inadmissible upon the principles discussed above and upon the authority of Mitchell v. Haggenmeyer, 51 Cal. 108 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • San Francisco & Sacramento Railway Co. v. Industrial Accident Commissionn

    201 Cal. 597 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1927

    The following cases would seem to be pertinent: Losh v. Evans & Co., 5 W. C. C. 17, 19 T. L. R. 142; Wilson v. Dakota, L. & P. Co., 45 S. D. 175 [ 186 N. W. 828 ] ; Dietzen Co. v. … Industrial Board of Illinois, 279 Ill. 11 [Ann. Cas. 1918B, 764, 116 N. E. 684 ] ; Mepham & Co. v. Industrial Com., 289 Ill. 484 [ 124 N. E. 540 ] ; Bischoff v. American Car & Foundry Co., 190 Mich. 229 [ 157 N.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Serrano v. Unruh

    32 Cal. 3d 621 · California Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1982

    (Brown v. Stackler (7th Cir. 1980) 612 F.2d 1057, 1059 .) We conclude that defendant’s first argument is without merit. … Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 26-27 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 520 P.2d 10 ]. (See also Bauguess v.

    Cited 277 timesPublished
  • Katz v. Fitzgerald

    152 Cal. 433 · California Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1907

    Ency. of Law, 635; Phillips v. Curtis, 4 Idaho, 193 , 38 Pac. 405 ; Southall v. Griffiths, 100 Ky. 91 , [ 37 S. W. 577 ].) … Supervisors, 111 Cal. 371 , [ 43 Pac. 975 ]; Spier v. Baker, 120 Cal. 370 , [ 52 Pac. 659 ]; and Brittain v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Jansen

    21 Cal. 2d 473 · California Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1943

    (Boyd v. *477 Slayback, 63 Cal. 493 ; Ward v. Dougherty, 75 Cal. 240 [ 17 P. 193 , 7 Am.St.Rep. 151 ]; Donahue v. Sweeney, 171 Cal. 388 [ 153 P. 708 ]; Daneri v. … Gazzola, 2 Cal.App. 351, 357 [ 83 P. 455 ]; City Lumber Co. v. Brown, 46 Cal.App. 603, 606 [ 189 P. 830 ].) In the case of Donahue v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Slaughter v. Friedman

    32 Cal. 3d 149 · California Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1982

    In Hackethal v. … Montalbano (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 725, 732-733 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 206 ] [communications between parents and school board]; Tiedemann v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Beale

    172 Cal. 226 · California Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1916

    Code, secs. 3780, 3817; Smith v. Furlong, 160 Cal. 522 , [ 117 Pac. 527 ]; Campbell v. Moran, 161 Cal. 325 , [ 119 Pac. 89 ]; Wright v. Anglo-Californian Bank, 161 Cal. 500 , [ 119 Pac. 651 ].) … (Lovell v. Frost, 44 Cal. 474 ; Thompson v. Pioche, 44 Cal. 508, 517 ; Thompson v. Felton, 54 Cal. 551 ; Unger v. Mooney, 63 Cal. 58 .6, [ 49 Am. Rep. 100 ].)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Heckendorn v. City of San Marino

    42 Cal. 3d 481 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1986

    (Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. Saylor (1971) 5 Cal.3d 685, 692 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 488 P.2d 161 ]; Reynolds v. State Board of Equalization (1946) 29 Cal.2d 137,140 [ 173 P.2d 551 , 174 P.2d 4 ].) … Friends of Mammoth v.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • People v. City of San Buenaventura

    213 Cal. 637 · California Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1931

    (See, also, Fragley v. Phelan, 126 Cal. 383, 403 [ 58 Pac. 923 ].) … (Stevenson v. Colgan, 91 Cal. 649 [ 25 Am. St. Rep. 230 , 14 L. R. A. 459, 27 Pac. 1089 ]; People v. Sacramento Drainage Dist., 155 Cal. 373 [ 103 Pac. 207 ]; Taylor v. Cole, supra; Allen v. State, 114 Ariz. 458 [44 L.

    Overruled on other grounds by Costa v. Superior Court, 39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 470 (2006)Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Sbarboro v. Jordan

    164 Cal. 51 · California Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1912

    As to such a convention, we have direct authority in this state, in the case of Hutchinson v. Brown, 122 Cal. 189 , [42 L. R. A. 232, 54 Pac. 738 ].

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Advanced Bionics Corp. v. Medtronic, Inc.

    128 Cal. Rptr. 2d 172 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 2003

    BROWN, J., Concurring. I agree with most of Justice Moreno’s concurrence. … (Offshore Rental Co. v. Continental Oil Co. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 157, 165 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 867 , 583 P.2d 721 ].)

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Daggett v. Southwest Packing Co.

    155 Cal. 762 · California Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1909

    Gear, 95 Cal. 579 , [ 30 Pac. 777 ]; Welch v. Sargent, 127 Cal. 84 , [ 59 Pac. 319 ] ; Walter v. … The decision in Union Savings Bank v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commercial Bank v. Kershner

    120 Cal. 495 · California Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1898

    And so in Felton v. … Arnott, 80 Cal. 348 ; Brown v. Willis, 67 Cal. 235 .) In Biddell v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Landrum v. Superior Court

    30 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1981

    [Citations.]" ( Stafford v. Realty Bond Service Corp. (1952) 39 Cal.2d 797, 805 [ 249 P.2d 241 ]; Stafford v. L.A. etc. Retirement Board (1954) 42 Cal.2d 795, 799 [ 270 P.2d 12 ]; Select Base Materials v. … Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; People v. Ruster, supra, 16 Cal.3d at p. 696 .)

    Cited 112 timesPublished
  • People v. Trevino

    39 Cal. 3d 667 · California Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1985

    Instead, I believe we should adhere to the approach set forth in People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258, 282 [ 148 Cal.Rptr. 890 , 583 P.2d 748 ] and reiterated in People v. … We recently reaffirmed this proposition in People v.

    Disapproved on other grounds by People v. Johnson, 47 Cal. 3d 1194 (1989)Cited 117 timesPublished
  • Fay v. Reed

    128 Cal. 357 · California Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1900

    In McBean v. … Co. v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of Boy Scouts of America

    17 Cal. 4th 670 · California Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1998

    BROWN, J. I concur in the judgment. In my view, however, the majority’s analysis cannot sustain the result. … Beginning at least with Isbister v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.