Case law

People v. Jones

6 Cal. 2d 554 · California Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1936

In the ease of People v. … have an indeterminate sentence law similar to ours hold that a statute which prescribes a minimum sentence of not less than five years and with no maximum is in law a life sentence until and unless a court or executive board

In Re Basuino

22 Cal. 2d 247 · California Supreme Court · May 20, 1943

In the case of Hambrick v. … Thus it may not be said that such decisions (People v. Schneider, supra; People v.

Estate of Yoell

164 Cal. 540 · California Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1913

E. 328 ] ; Young v. Hicks, 92 N. Y. 234 ; Johnston v. Spicer, 107 N. Y. 191 , [ 13 N. E. 753 ] ; Pavlicek v. Roessler, 222 Ill. 83 , [ 78 N. E. 11 ] ; Brown v. Brown’s Admr., (Ky.), 80 S. … Warner v.

Estate of Burnison

33 Cal. 2d 638 · California Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1949

So significant is the case of United States v. … circumstances (United States v.

Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation District

211 Cal. 670 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1931

Thus in Williston v. … Co. v.

Black v. Sprague

54 Cal. 266 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

In Brown v. … (See Clark v. McElvy, 11 Cal. 161 ; McCreery v. Everding, 44 Id. 246 ; Chidester v. Con. P. Ditch Co. 53 Id. 56.) The Court further instructed the jury as follows: “ 13th.

Arnold v. San Ramon Valley Bank

184 Cal. 632 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1921

(Pullen v. Placer Co. Bank, supra; Florence v. Brown, 124 U. S. 385, 391 , [ 31 L. Ed. 424 , 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 531, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes]; Hopkinson v. Forster, L. R. 19 Eq. Cas. 76; O’Connor v. … The plaintiff relies on Burtnett v. First Nat. Bank, 38 Mich. 630 ; Shotwell v. Sioux F. S. Bank, 34 S. D. 109, [L. R. A. 1915A, 715, 147 N. W. 288 ]; Cady v. South Omaha Bank, 46 Neb. 756 , [ 65 N.

Poak v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

177 Cal. 190 · California Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1918

Co. v. Gates, 135 Ill. App. 180 ; Peterson v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co., 211 Mo. 498 , [ 111 S. W. 37 ]; Patterson v. Westchester Elec. Ry. Co., 26 App. Div. 336 , [ 49 N. Y. Supp. 796 ].) … Co. v. Cusick, 60 Kan. 590 , [ 72 Am. St. Rep. 374 , 57 Pac. 519 ]; Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. Shaw, 110 Tenn. 467 , [ 75 S. W. 713 ]; Birmingham Union Ry. Co. v. Smith, 90 Ala. 60 , [ 24 Am. St.

Doxsee Co. v. All Persons

3 Cal. 2d 609 · California Supreme Court · May 6, 1935

(Knowlton v. Mackenzie, 110 Cal. 183, 188 [ 42 Pac. 580 ] ; 6 Cor. Jur., p. 654, sec. 163; 2 R. C. L., sec. 85, p. 1006; Suttman v. Superior Court, 174 Cal. 243 [ 162 Pac. 1032 ]; Kellett v. Kellett, 110 Cal. … (San Francisco v. Brown, 153 Cal. 644, 651 [ 96 Pac. 281 ] ; Halpern v. Superior Court, 190 Cal. 384 [ 212 Pac. 916 ].)

De La Beckwith v. Sheldon

165 Cal. 319 · California Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1913

(Spier v. Hyde, 78 App. Div. 151 , [ 79 N. Y. Supp. 702 ]; Morehouse v. Second Nat. Bank, 98 N. Y. 503 ; Kromer v. Heim, 75 N. Y. 576 , [ 31 Am. Rep. 491 ]; Dean v. Skiff, 128 Mass. 174 ; Huggins v. Safford, 67 Mo. … Rep. 187 , 24 Pac. 280 ]; Drew v. Pedlar, 87 Cal. 443, [ 22 Am. St. Rep. 257 , 25 Pac. 749 ] ; Phelps v. Brown, 95 Cal. 572 , [ 30 Pac. 774 ]; Fountain v. Semi-Tropical *325 L. & W.

Rose v. Southern Trust Co.

178 Cal. 580 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1918

(Swafford v. Board of Education, 127 Cal. 484 , [ 59 Pac. 900 ].) … It was clearly inadmissible upon the principles discussed above and upon the authority of Mitchell v. Haggenmeyer, 51 Cal. 108 .

Hogan v. Ingold

38 Cal. 2d 802 · California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1952

In Whitten v. … Since Hawes v. Contra Costa Water Co. (sometimes cited as Hawes v.

Katz v. Fitzgerald

152 Cal. 433 · California Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1907

Ency. of Law, 635; Phillips v. Curtis, 4 Idaho, 193 , 38 Pac. 405 ; Southall v. Griffiths, 100 Ky. 91 , [ 37 S. W. 577 ].) … Supervisors, 111 Cal. 371 , [ 43 Pac. 975 ]; Spier v. Baker, 120 Cal. 370 , [ 52 Pac. 659 ]; and Brittain v.

Wilson v. Eu

54 Cal. 3d 471 · California Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1991

(See also Legislature v. … (See Legislature v. Reinecke (1973) 9 Cal.3d 166, 167 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 18 , 507 P.2d 626 ] [Reinecke III].)

Miller v. Jansen

21 Cal. 2d 473 · California Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1943

(Boyd v. *477 Slayback, 63 Cal. 493 ; Ward v. Dougherty, 75 Cal. 240 [ 17 P. 193 , 7 Am.St.Rep. 151 ]; Donahue v. Sweeney, 171 Cal. 388 [ 153 P. 708 ]; Daneri v. … Gazzola, 2 Cal.App. 351, 357 [ 83 P. 455 ]; City Lumber Co. v. Brown, 46 Cal.App. 603, 606 [ 189 P. 830 ].) In the case of Donahue v.

San Francisco & Sacramento Railway Co. v. Industrial Accident Commissionn

201 Cal. 597 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1927

The following cases would seem to be pertinent: Losh v. Evans & Co., 5 W. C. C. 17, 19 T. L. R. 142; Wilson v. Dakota, L. & P. Co., 45 S. D. 175 [ 186 N. W. 828 ] ; Dietzen Co. v. … Industrial Board of Illinois, 279 Ill. 11 [Ann. Cas. 1918B, 764, 116 N. E. 684 ] ; Mepham & Co. v. Industrial Com., 289 Ill. 484 [ 124 N. E. 540 ] ; Bischoff v. American Car & Foundry Co., 190 Mich. 229 [ 157 N.

Slaughter v. Friedman

32 Cal. 3d 149 · California Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1982

In Hackethal v. … Montalbano (1978) 87 Cal.App.3d 725, 732-733 [ 151 Cal.Rptr. 206 ] [communications between parents and school board]; Tiedemann v.

Jordan v. Beale

172 Cal. 226 · California Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1916

Code, secs. 3780, 3817; Smith v. Furlong, 160 Cal. 522 , [ 117 Pac. 527 ]; Campbell v. Moran, 161 Cal. 325 , [ 119 Pac. 89 ]; Wright v. Anglo-Californian Bank, 161 Cal. 500 , [ 119 Pac. 651 ].) … (Lovell v. Frost, 44 Cal. 474 ; Thompson v. Pioche, 44 Cal. 508, 517 ; Thompson v. Felton, 54 Cal. 551 ; Unger v. Mooney, 63 Cal. 58 .6, [ 49 Am. Rep. 100 ].)

Mound City Land & Water Ass'n v. Philip

64 Cal. 493 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1884

In 1853 Vejar and Dalton presented their petitions to the board of land commissioners for confirmation of the tracts claimed to have been set aside to them respectively by the judgment of partition, and Palomares presented … (See Hathaway v. Be Soto, 21 Cal. 191 ; Mahoney v. Van Winkle, 21 Cal. 580 ; Carpentier v. Thurston, 24 Cal. 268 .) Some of the findings are somewhat informal, but the court passed upon the material issues.

Heckendorn v. City of San Marino

42 Cal. 3d 481 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1986

(Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. Saylor (1971) 5 Cal.3d 685, 692 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 488 P.2d 161 ]; Reynolds v. State Board of Equalization (1946) 29 Cal.2d 137,140 [ 173 P.2d 551 , 174 P.2d 4 ].) … Friends of Mammoth v.