Case law

People v. Townsel

63 Cal. 4th 25 · California Supreme Court · Apr 21, 2016

(And see Brown v. … (People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 446–448 (Brown); see People v.

Valley Bank of Nevada v. Superior Court

15 Cal. 3d 652 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1975

Thus, in Burrows v. … (First National Bank in Lenox v. Brown (Iowa 1970) 181 N.W.2d 178, 183 ; Milohnich v.

Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. Kirby

5 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1971

from which he is unlawfully precluded by such inferior tribunal, corporation, board or person.” … (County of L.A. v. Southern Cal. Tel. Co. (1948) 32 Cal.2d 378, 389 [ 196 P.2d 773 ].) 14 State Board v.

Seidel v. Waring

36 Cal. 2d 149 · California Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1950

(See Holland v. Byram, 28 Cal.2d 567, 568 [ 170 P.2d 937 ].) … (See Cunningham v. Hart, 80 Cal.App.2d 902, 907-908 [ 183 P.2d 75 ].)

Heilbron v. FowLer Switch Canal Co.

75 Cal. 426 · California Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1888

(Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 258 ; Moore v. Clear Lake W. Co., 68 Cal. 150 ; Stanford v. Felt, 71 Cal. 249 ; Parke v. Kilham, 8 Cal. 77 ; 68 Am. Dec. 310 ; Ferrea v. Knipe, 28 Cal. 341 ; 87 Am. Dec. 128 .) … (Brown v. Chadbourne, 31 Me. 9 ; 50 Am. Dec. 641 ; Moore v. Sanborne, 2 Mich. 519 ; 59 Am. Dec. 209 ; Wood on Nuisances, sec. 485; Smith v. City of Rochester, 92 N. Y„ 463; 44 Am. Rep. 393 ; Woodruff v. N. B. G. M.

Humboldt Savings & Loan Society v. Wennerhold

3 Cal. Unrep. 52 · California Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1889

“And on the following date said Hartmann took from the money of the bank the following sums, filling a check or receipt, to which he forged the name of V. … The appellate court, in speaking to such a matter, after alluding to the rule laid down as to official bonds in Hubert v.

Hurtel v. Albert Cohn, Inc.

5 Cal. 2d 145 · California Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1936

To the same effect are Reinders v. Olsen, 60 Cal. App. 764, 771 [ 214 Pac. 268 ], and Fresno T. Co. v. Atchison etc. Ry. Co., 175 Cal. 358 [ 165 Pac. 1013 ]. … (Newell v. Desmond, 74 Cal. 46 [ 15 Pac. 369 ]; Johnston v. McDuffee, 83 Cal. 30 [ 23 Pac. 214 ] ; Adams v. Weaver, 117 Cal. 42, 49 [ 48 Pac. 972 ].) There are no other points which require discussion.

People ex rel. Vejar v. Metzker

1 Cal. Unrep. 676 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1871

devolves the duty and confers the power of deciding who is entitled to the office upon another tribunal; and to that special tribunal must plaintiff resort for a determination of the matters presented by his complaint: Batman v. … (Ky.) 538; Necum v. Kirtley, 13 B. Mon. (Ky.) 517; State v. Jarrett, 17 Md. 327 ; Grier v. Shackelford, 2 Treadway Const. (S. C.) 642; Commonwealth v. Meeser, 44 Pa. 343 ; Whitney v. Board of Delegates, 14 Cal. 479 .

Anthony v. Janssen

183 Cal. 329 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1920

(Donahue v. McNulty, 24 Cal. 411 , [ 85 Am. Dec. 78 ].) … Proc., sec. 700; Foorman v. Wallace, 75 Cal. 552 [ 17 Pac. 680 ].)

In Re Hitchings

6 Cal. 4th 97 · California Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1997

Michael Brown, Judge of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, to act as our referee. Judge Brown has now filed his report. … (Clark v.

Jones v. Duchow

87 Cal. 109 · California Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1890

(People v. Eckman, 72 Cal. 584 .) … Proc., sec. 2051; Sharon v. Sharon, 79 Cal. 633 , and authorities there cited.)

San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad v. Bee

48 Cal. 398 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

On the 13th day of November, 1869, some three days previous, a resolution had been adopted by the Board of Directors of the San Francisco * *404 and Humboldt Bay Bailroad Company authorizing the President and Secretary of … In Martin v. Zellerbach (38 Cal. R. 300) it was held here' that the property and assets of a corporation are vested in its trustees, to .be preserved by them as a fund to secure the creditors of the corporation.

Lowe v. Alexander

15 Cal. 296 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1860

Whitney v. Board of Delegates San Francisco Fire Department, 14 Cal. 479 .)

Adams v. Southern Pacific Co.

4 Cal. 2d 731 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1935

Justice Lang- *743 don in Watson v. … (Koehl v. Carpenter, 47 Cal. App. 642, 646 [ 191 Pac. 43 ]; *744 Little v. Yanagisawa, 70 Cal. App. 303, 308 [ 233 Pac. 357 ]; 17 C. J. 1338, secs. 215 and 216.)

City of Santa Rosa v. Bower

142 Cal. 299 · California Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1904

The ease of the City of South Bend v. … The case is clearly distinguishable from that of Howland v.

Hernandez v. City of Hanford

59 Cal. Rptr. 3d 442 · California Supreme Court · Jun 7, 2007

Van Sicklen v. Browne (1971) 15 Cal.App.3d 122 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 786 ] (Van Sicklen) is the earliest in the series of relevant Court of Appeal decisions. … Browne, supra, 15 Cal.App.3d 122 , Ensign Bickford Realty Corp. v. City Council, supra, 68 Cal.App.3d 467 , or Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v.

People v. Hill

67 Cal. 2d 105 · California Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1967

VI, § 4; White v. Superior Court, 110 Cal. 60, 67 [42 P. *114 480] ; Brown v. Campbell, 110 Cal. 644, 648 [ 43 P. 12 ] ; Tubby v. … (Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487, 497 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 899 , 83 S.Ct. 774 ] ; see also Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles, 357 U.S. 214 [ 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 ].)

Hardy v. Stumpf

21 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1978

Plaintiff relies upon the minority opinion in Hardy v. … In D'Amico v.

Adams v. Doyle

139 Cal. 678 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1903

On January 7, 1903, after the time when the term for which the petitioner was elected had begun, Price, the incumbent, not having resigned, and being still in charge of the office, the board of supervisors of the county made … (Dorsey v. Smith, 28 Cal. 21 ; Ward v. Marshall, 96 Cal, 155 ; 1 People v. Shawer, 127 Cal. 347 .) His title to the office depends upon the validity of the order appointing him.

Hagan v. Superior Court

57 Cal. 2d 767 · California Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1962

Cal. v. Superior Court, 194 Cal. 795 [ 231 P. 344 ] ; Trenouth v. Superior Court, 193 Cal. 330 [ 223 P. 951 ] ; Obenchain v. Superior Court, 187 Cal. 419 [ 202 P. 132 ].) … (McDonough v. Garrison, 68 Cal.App.2d 318, 325 [ 156 P.2d 983 ] ; see also Funeral Directors Assn. v. Board of Funeral Directors & Embalmers, 22 Cal.2d 104 [ 136 P.2d 785 ] ; Confidential, Inc. v.