Case law

Sugarman v. State Board of Equalization

51 Cal. 2d 361 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1958

Chief Justice Marshall, in Brown v. … The tests laid down in Brown v. Maryland, supra, and Hooven & Allison Co. v.

State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court

9 Cal. 2d 252 · California Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1937

(Citing Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 6 Cal. (2d) 557 [ 59 Pac. (2d) 119 ] and Whitten v. State Board of Optometry, 8 Cal. (2d) 444 [ 65 Pac. (2d) 1296 ].) … (Stoddard v. Superior Court, 108 Cal. 303 [ 41 Pac. 278, 279 ].)

Duskin v. State Board of Dry Cleaners

58 Cal. 2d 155 · California Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1962

(See Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 153 Cal.App.2d 249, 256 [ 314 P.2d 500 ].) … McCaughan, 49 Cal.2d 409, 414-417 [ 317 P.2d 974 ] ; McMurtry v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 180 Cal.App.2d 760, 765-766, 770 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 910 ] ; People v.

Zuckerman v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

29 Cal. 4th 32 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2002

J.); id. at p. 421 (dis. opn. of Brown, J.); California Teachers Assn. v. … .); Tobe v. City of Santa Ana, supra, 9 Cal.4th at p. 1084; Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 181.)

Payroll Guarantee Ass'n v. Board of Education

27 Cal. 2d 197 · California Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1945

(See Goodman v. Board of Education, 48 Cal.App.2d 731 [ 120 P.2d 665 ].) … (See Cox v. New Hampshire, 312 U.S. 569, 574 [ 61 S.Ct. 762 , 85 L.Ed. 1049 , 133 A.L.R. 1396 ].) The board’s primary concern is with the maintenance of that program.

Swift v. San Francisco Stock & Exchange Board

67 Cal. 567 · California Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1885

(Barboro v. Occidental Grove, 4 Mo. App. 429 .) So in Durian v. … See also Lafond v.

Taenaka v. State Board of Equalization

42 Cal. 2d 657 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1954

Thereafter the same board member suggested that as petitioner was going into military service the board keep custody of the license for a year. … It ordered the board to restore petitioner’s license to him.

Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

19 Cal. 3d 329 · California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1977

Citing Mihesuah v. Workmen’s Comp. … (Compare, Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Company v. Ind Acc. Com. (1946) 11 Cal.Comp.Cases 86, 87-88, with Bergeron v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1942) 7 Cal.Comp.Cases 14, 15; see Stone v. Ind. Acc.

Stockton Civic Theatre v. Board of Supervisors

66 Cal. 2d 13 · California Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1967

(Nixon v. Brown (1923) 46 Nev. 439 [ 214 P. 524 , 530 et seq.]; In re Shakespeare Memorial Trust [1923] 2 Ch. 398, 401-402; see Rest.2d Trusts, § 374, com. f.; cf. Community Drama Assn. v. … (Pacific Home v. County of Los Angeles, 41 Cal.2d 844, 849 [ 264 P.2d 539 ]; Pasadena Hospital Assn. v. County of Los Angeles, 35 Cal.2d 779, 786 [ 221 P.2d 62 ].) Pacific Home v.

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

71 Cal. 2d 1200 · California Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1969

An appeal to the respondent Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (hereinafter appeals board) was filed by the licensee, and on July 12, 1967, the appeals board reversed the decision of the department. … (Delaney v. Lowery (1944) 25 Cal.2d 561, 569 [ 154 P.2d 674 ].)

Drescher v. Board of Supervisors

191 Cal. 234 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1923

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Board of Supervisors to appoint a member of the Honcut-Yuba Irrigation District, upon the ground that there is a vacancy in the board of that district … (Kelly v. Edwards, 69 Cal. 460 [ 11 Pac. 1 ].) The petition is denied.

Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

53 Cal. 4th 1227 · California Supreme Court · Apr 26, 2012

[Citation.]‖ (Citicorp North America, Inc. v. … Name of Opinion Dicon Fiberoptics, Inc. v.

Board of Education v. Thorpe

1 Cal. Unrep. 254 · California Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1866

To the complaints of this latter class a court of equity will not listen: Board of Commissioners of the Funded Debt of the City of San Jose v. Younger [ 29 Cal. 172 ], October term, 1865.

Board of Education v. Martin

57 Cal. 139 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

The Court: On the authority of the Board of Education v. Keenan, 55 Cal. 642 , judgment and order of nonsuit reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. *140 McKinstry, J., dissented.

Beatrice Co. v. State Board of Equalization

6 Cal. 4th 767 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1993

The Board argued that Cal-Metal Corp. v. … Neither Ray v.

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 517 · California Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2017

Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 181 (Brown).) We have sometimes applied a more lenient standard, asking whether the statute is unconstitutional “in the generality or great majority of cases.” (San Remo Hotel v. … (See Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 201.)

Plotnick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

1 Cal. 3d 622 · California Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1970

I would affirm the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board.

Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court

5 Cal. Unrep. 797 · California Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1897

Petition for certiorari to review the judgment of the superior court removing the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco from office in a proceeding under the provisions of the act of March 7, 1881 (

County of Alameda v. Board of Retirement

46 Cal. 3d 902 · California Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1988

In Drummey v. … (See Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equal. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 557, 559 [ 59 P.2d 119 ].)

Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court

5 Cal. Unrep. 797 · California Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1897

Petition for certiorari to review the judgment of the superior court removing the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco from office in a proceeding under the provisions of the act of March 7, 1881 (