Case law

People v. Webb

38 Cal. 467 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1869

(State v. McKee, 1 Bailey, 651 ; Commonwealth v. Cummings, 3 Cush. 212 ; State v. Kittle, 2 Tyler, 471 ; State v. Davis, 4 Black. 346 ; State v. Bouche, 5 Id. 154; State v. Johnson, 8 Id. 533 ; Commonwealth v. … Wright, 3 Id. 421; State v. Hand, 1 Eng. 169; State v. Denton, Id. 259; State v. Burris, 3 Tex. 118 ; People v. Comstock, 8 Wend. 549 ; People v. Corning, 2 Coms. 9; State v. Brown, 16 Conn. 54 ; State v.

Union Oil Co. of California v. Pac. Sur. Co.

182 Cal. 69 · California Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1920

The board of directors of the two corporations were different with the exception of W. L. Stewart, who was also vice-president and general manager of both corporations. … (Goff v. Ladd, 161 Cal. 257 , [ 118 Pac. 792 ].)

In re Corbett

1 Cal. Unrep. 314 · California Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1866

It appears from the .agreed statement that the board of supervisors of Sierra county levied the county taxes for 1866 in February of that year, and that they became a judgment against the person and a lien against the property … Under these circumstances the assessment of the taxes for the fiscal year 1866>-67 and the collection of them, belongs to *315 Sierra county, with reference to whose “expenditures” alone the taxes were levied: Moss v.

McLean v. Baldwin

136 Cal. 565 · California Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1902

(Helm v. Wilson, 76 Cal. 476 ; Burnham v. Stone, 101 Cal. 170 .) … (Cave v. Crafts, 53 Cal. 135 ; Brown v. Campbell, 110 Cal. 644 ; Freeman on Judgments, sec. 322, and cases there cited.) The judgment of Baldwin v.

Harrold v. Harrold

43 Cal. 2d 77 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1954

This final decree was reversed on appeal, on the authority of Webster v. Webster, supra; Newell v. Superior Court, 27 Cal.App. 343 [ 149 P. *88 998 ]; Ritter v. Ritter, 103 Cal.App. 583 [ 284 P. 950 ] ; and Cory v. … (Pereira v. Pereira, 156 Cal. 1, 10 [ 103 P. 488 , 134 Am.St.Rep. 107 , 23 L.RA.N.S. 880]; Brown v. Brown, 170 *89 Cal. 1, 4 [ 147 P. 1168 ]; Elms v. Elms, 4 Cal.2d 681, 685 [ 52 P.2d 223 , 102 A.L.R. 811 ].)

D'Angona v. County of Los Angeles

27 Cal. 3d 661 · California Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1980

(Reed v. … Garcia v.

Dryer v. Los Angeles Rams

40 Cal. 3d 406 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1985

Without a hearing, the executive board issued a decision fully supporting the performer. The promoter protested and was granted a hearing. … The referee also recommended an award in favor of the performer, which was affirmed by the same executive board.

Department of Mental Hygiene v. Kirchner

60 Cal. 2d 716 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1964

Board of Medical Examiners (1962) §7 Cal.2d 228, 237 [13] [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ] ; Bilyeu v. State Employees’ Retirement *723 System (1962) 58 Cal.2d 618, 623 [2] [ 24 Cal.Rptr. 562 , 375 P.2d 442 ].) … State Board of Social Welfare (1947) 82 Cal.App.2d 627, 631-632 [2] [ 186 P.2d 429 ] ; (attacks based on certain limited claims of discriminatory classification). Maricopa County v.

Ennabe v. Manosa

58 Cal. 4th 697 · California Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2014

Brown thereafter served as a “bouncer,” standing at the gate and charging uninvited guests an admission fee of $3 to $5 per person. … (Vesely v. Sager, supra, 5 Cal.3d 153.) Overruling Cole v.

Young v. Wright

52 Cal. 407 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

The case is not distinguishable on principle from People v. Mier, 24 Cal. 61 , which has been approved in many subsequent cases. … A judgment is duly “rendered” when it is duly pronounced and ordered to be entered. ( Gray v. Palmer, 28 Cal. 416 ; Peck v. Cortis, 31 Ibid. 207; Geneilla v. Relyea, 32 Ibid. 159.)

McMorris v. State Bar

29 Cal. 3d 96 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1981

Because petitioner does not contest the findings of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar, we briefly summarize those findings without additional review of the underlying evidence. 1. … (Doyle v. State Bar (1976) 15 Cal.3d 973, 978 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 801 , 544 P.2d 937 ]; see Spindell v. State Bar, supra, 13 Cal.3d 253, 260 .)

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

124 Cal. Rptr. 2d 202 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2002

BROWN, J., Concurring. I agree with the majority that the 1990 complaint against Officer C. does not meet the materiality standard set forth in Brady v. … The majority relies on Pennsylvania v. Ritchie (1987) 480 U.S. 39 [ 107 S.Ct. 989 , 94 L.Ed.2d 40 ] (Ritchie). (Maj. opn., ante, at pp. 14-15.)

Maddux v. Walthall

141 Cal. 412 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1903

(Farnham v. Boland, 134 Cal. 151 ; Salcido v. Roberts, 136 Cal. 670 ; Patterson v. Hanley, 136 Cal. 265 ; People v. Campbell, 138 Cal. 11 ; Taylor v. … (Rutledge v. Crawford, 91 Cal. 632 ; 1 Lauer v. Estes, 120 Cal. 652 .)

Elbert, Ltd. v. Gross

41 Cal. 2d 322 · California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1953

(Bermite Powder Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 38 Cal.2d 700, 704 [ 242 P.2d 9 ]; Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 25 Cal.2d 918, 923 [ 156 P.2d 1 ]; Standard Oil Co. v. … In Miller & Lux, Inc. v.

Megerle v. Ashe

1 Cal. Unrep. 659 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1871

They cannot, therefore, avail themselves of the rule in Youngs v. Bell, 4 Cal. 202 , Klink v. Cohen, 13 Cal. 623 , Bell v. Brown, 22 Cal. 672 , and Uridias v.

People v. Ah Chung

54 Cal. 398 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

It was held by this Court in the case of People v. … In the case of People v. Murray, 41 Cal. 66 , it was held, that as defendant’s first instruction was substantially given in the charge of the Court, its refusal was not erroneous; and in the late case of People v.

Marriott v. Williams

152 Cal. 705 · California Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1908

(Sloan v. Edwards, 61 Md. 100 ; Webb v. Gilman, 80 Me. 177 , [ 13 Atl. 688 ]; Draper v. Baker, 61 Wis. 450 , [ 50 Am. Rep. 143 , 21 N. W. 527 ] ; Brown v. Evans, 17 Fed. 912 ; 3 Cyc. 1095; 2 Am. & Eng. … (Huddleson v. Borough, 111 Pa. St. 110, [ 2 Atl. 200 ]; McCool v. Mahoney, 54 Cal. 492 ; Nichols v. Dunphy, 58 Cal. 607 ; Everrord v. Gabbert, 83 Ind. 492 ; Carney v.

Boggs v. Jordan

204 Cal. 207 · California Supreme Court · May 21, 1928

(Wright v. Engram, 186 Cal. 659 [ 201 Pac. 788 ]; Williams v. Gill, 65 Cal. App. 132 [ 223 Pac. 559 ]; Ratto v. Board of Trustees, 75 Cal. App. 724 [ 243 Pac. 466 ].) … Proc.; Sheehan v. Board of Police Commrs., 188 Cal.. 535 [ 206 Pac. 70 ]; Perrin v.

People v. Heard

4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 131 · California Supreme Court · Aug 28, 2003

(a)(1)), all perpetrated against 11-year-old Katrina Brown. … Brown, in May 1990, about seven months prior to the murder.

Vore v. Ephraim

173 Cal. 245 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1916

(Wall v. Mines, 128 Cal. 138 , [ 60 Pac. 682 ]; Vinson v. Los Angeles etc. Co., 141 Cal. 154 , [ 74 Pac. 757 ]; Gay v. Gay, 146 Cal. 240 , [ 79 Pac. 885 ]; Code Civ. Proc., sec. 950.) … Proc., sec. 939; Brown v. Towles, 7 Cal. 398 ; Walls v. Preston, 25 Cal. 59 ; Harper v. Minor, 27 Cal. 107 ; Haviland v. Southern C. E. Co., 172 Cal. 601 , [ 158 Pac. 328 ].)