Case law

Travelers Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

68 Cal. 2d 7 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1967

Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board, supra, 65 Cal.2d 429 , governs the specific issue. … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board, supra, 65 Cal.2d 429, 433-435 .)

Superior Oil Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

60 Cal. 2d 406 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1963

In Butler Brothers v. … (See also John Deere Plow Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, 38 Cal.2d 214, 229 [ 238 P.2d 569 ].)

Pullman Kellogg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

26 Cal. 3d 450 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1980

In reaching its conclusion, the board relied on Berry v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 68 Cal.2d 786 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 68 , 441 P.2d 908 ] and Zemke v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (See Franklin v. Workers’ Comp.

Rogers v. Board of Directors of Pasadena

218 Cal. 221 · California Supreme Court · May 26, 1933

While this court doubtless has power in a clear case to determine that a case falls outside the scope of the act of 1913 (see People v. City of Lemoore, 37 Cal. App. 79 [ 174 Pac. 93 ]; Capuchino Land Co. v. … Board of Trustees of Ban Bruno, 34 Cal. App. 239 [ 167 Pac. 178 ]), this is not such a case. The extent and character of the land proposed to be annexed is a matter for the electors to decide. (See People v.

Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

26 Cal. 3d 770 · California Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1980

(Laisne v. State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ]; Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790 [ 136 P.2d 304 ].) … Portland Cement Co. v. Cal. Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board (1960) 178 Cal.App.2d 263, 269 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 37 ]; Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Walls (1960) 178 Cal.App.2d 284, 288 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 847 ]; General Motors Corp. v. Cal.

Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

52 Cal. 2d 259 · California Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1959

(Munro v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 50 Cal.2d 863, 864 [ 326 P.2d 506 ].) … Board of Permit Appeals, 23 Cal.2d 303, 323 [ 144 P.2d 4 ]; Cantrell v. Board of Supervisors, 87 Cal.App.2d 471, 479 [ 197 P.2d 218 ]; North Side etc. Assn. v.

State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court

39 Cal. 3d 633 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1985

(Modern Barber Col. v. Cal. Emp. Stab. Com., supra, 31 Cal.2d at p. 723; see also Aronoff v. Franchise Tax Board (1963) 60 Cal.2d 177, 178-180 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 383 P.2d 409 ].) … (Brown v. Felsen (1979) 442 U.S. 127, 131 [ 60 L.Ed.2d 767, 771 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 ].)

United Auburn Indian Cmty. of the Auburn Rancheria v. Brown

212 Cal. Rptr. 3d 620 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 2017

Duskin v. State Board of Dry Cleaners

58 Cal. 2d 155 · California Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1962

(See Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 153 Cal.App.2d 249, 256 [ 314 P.2d 500 ].) … McCaughan, 49 Cal.2d 409, 414-417 [ 317 P.2d 974 ] ; McMurtry v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 180 Cal.App.2d 760, 765-766, 770 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 910 ] ; People v.

Aylward v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

31 Cal. 2d 833 · California Supreme Court · May 6, 1948

Com. v. Agricultural etc. Com., 17 Cal.2d 204, 209 [ 109 P.2d 918 ]; Heap v. City of Los Angeles, 6 Cal.2d 405 [ 57 P.2d 1323 ]; Proud v. McGregor, 9 Cal.2d 178, 179 [ 70 P.2d 194 ]; Pacheco v. … Not only will a court refuse to grant mandate to enforce a void order of such a board (Proud v. McGregor, 9 Cal.2d 178 [ 70 P.2d 194 ]; Pacheco v.

Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

34 Cal. 3d 743 · California Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1983

B. v. Joseph (9th Cir. 1979) 605 F.2d 466, 468 ; National Labor Relations Board v. McGahey (5th Cir. 1956) 233 F.2d 406, 412 .) … Licorice Co. v. Labor Board (1940) 309 U.S. 350, 363-366 [ 84 L.Ed. 799, 810, 811 , 60 S.Ct. 569 ], with Edison Co. v. Labor Board (1938) 305 U.S. 197, 231-239 [ 83 L.Ed. 126, 141-145 , 59 S.Ct. 206 ].)

Blakeley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

3 Cal. 3d 320 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1970

(Standard Rectifier Corp. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., 65 Cal.2d 287, 290 [ 54 Cal.Rptr. 100 , 419 P.2d 164 ].) … (Standard Rectifier Corp. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, pp. 290-291.)

Coster v. Schneider

23 Cal. 142 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

(Lord v. Morris, 18 Cal. 490 ; McCarthy v. White, 21 Id. 495 ; Grattan v. Wiggins, 23 Id. 16.)

Honolulu Oil Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

60 Cal. 2d 417 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1963

But the decisional law, upon which the board relies, does not support its contention. As stated in the Superior Oil Company case this court, in Butler Brothers v. … (See Superior Oil Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, ante, p. 406, at p. 416 [ 34 Cal.Rptr. 545 , 386 P.2d 33 ].) The judgment is reversed. Gibson, C.

Drescher v. Board of Supervisors

191 Cal. 234 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1923

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Board of Supervisors to appoint a member of the Honcut-Yuba Irrigation District, upon the ground that there is a vacancy in the board of that district … (Kelly v. Edwards, 69 Cal. 460 [ 11 Pac. 1 ].) The petition is denied.

Highland Ranch v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

29 Cal. 3d 848 · California Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1981

(County of Los Angeles v. Frisbie (1942) 19 Cal.2d 634, 639 [ 122 P.2d 526 ]; see, e.g., Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ]; Dickey v. … (See, e.g., Virginia Electric Co. v. Board (1943) 319 U.S. 533, 539-540 [ 87 L.Ed. 1568, 1574 , 63 S.Ct. 1214 ].)

Board of Fish & Game Commissioners v. Riley

194 Cal. 37 · California Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1924

In the case of Jamme v. … In the case of Riley, etc., v.

Board of Regents State Universities v. Davis

14 Cal. 3d 33 · California Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1975

Although Place v. … Bk. v.

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

7 Cal. 3d 433 · California Supreme Court · Jul 7, 1972

, Inc. v. … Appeals Board, supra, 55 Cal.2d 867, 876 ; see Boreta Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, supra, 2 Cal.3d 85, 95-96 .)

Kirby v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

71 Cal. 2d 1200 · California Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1969

An appeal to the respondent Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (hereinafter appeals board) was filed by the licensee, and on July 12, 1967, the appeals board reversed the decision of the department. … (Delaney v. Lowery (1944) 25 Cal.2d 561, 569 [ 154 P.2d 674 ].)