Case law

Williams v. Mecartney

69 Cal. 556 · California Supreme Court · May 24, 1886

defective condition of the street, a service of notice by the superintendent of streets upon defendant, requiring him to make necessary repairs; his neglect and refusal to make such repairs; the adoption of a resolution of the board … (Schroeder v. Wittram, 66 Cal. 636 .)

Lean v. Givens

146 Cal. 739 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 1905

(Dam v. Zink, 112 Cal. 92 ; Sanders v. Russell, 86 Cal. 120 ; 2 Barrett v. Sims, 59 Cal. 615 ; Bowman v. Norton, 16 Cal. 221 ; Ackley v. Chamberlain, 16 Cal. 181 3 ). … v.

La Marche v. New York Life Ins. Co.

126 Cal. 498 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1899

(Wheaton v. North British etc. Ins. Co., 76 Cal. 415 ; 9 Am. St. Rep. 216 ; Hingston v. Insurance Co., 42 Iowa, 46 ; Fitchner v. Fire Assn., 103 Iowa, 276, 279 ; Swan v. Insurance Co., 96 Pa. St. 37; Dowling v. … Co. v. Brown, 50 Mo. App. 461 .)

Smith v. Garvin

37 Cal. 3d 186 · California Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1984

. § 8341 , Brown v. Devine (N.D.Cal. 1983) 574 F.Supp. 790, 792 ), under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act ( 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq., Powell v. … (See also Adduddell v. Board of Administration (1970) 8 Cal.App.3d 243 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 268 ]; Brennfleck v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 3 Cal.App.3d 666 [ 84 Cal.Rptr. 50 ].)

Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.

54 Cal. 3d 744 · California Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1991

(E.g., Goodwine v. Superior Court (1965) 63 Cal.2d 481, 485 [ 47 Cal.Rptr. 201 , 407 P.2d 1 ]; Price, supra, 42 Cal.2d 577 , 585; Brown v. Clorox Co. (1976) 56 Cal.App.3d 306, 311 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 385 ].) … (Id. at pp. 181-182; Holmes, supra, 156 Cal.App.3d at pp. 388-389; Brown v. Clorox Co., supra, 56 Cal.App.3d 306, 313-314 ; see Hemmelgarn v. Boeing Co., supra, 106 Cal.App.3d at p. 580 .)

People v. Crossdale

116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 686 · California Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2002

Opinion BROWN, J.— The issue in this case is whether a first offense for Penal Code 1 section 502.7, subdivision (a) (section 502.7(a)) can be punished as a felony if the amount of the loss does not exceed $400. … (c), (d)); People v. Salorse (1882) 62 Cal. 139, 142 [grand larceny of horse committed without reference to its value]; People v.

The Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Jurgens

170 Cal. 273 · California Supreme Court · May 28, 1915

Bedell v. … It was held that the board of supervisors had the right to except in its resolution that part of the street which the railroad company was bound under its franchise to keep in order. While Oakland Paving Co. v.

People v. Biggins

2 Cal. Unrep. 303 · California Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

Morrison, 17 Tex. 372 -387; Hughes v. Monty, 24 Iowa, 499 ; Harrison v. Roy, 39 Miss. 397 . There was no error in the ninth instruction. … Co. v. Ingraham, 77 Ill. 309 . Judgment and order affirmed. I concur in the judgment: Ross, J.

People v. Douglas

50 Cal. 3d 468 · California Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1990

(See Hamilton, supra, 48 Cal.3d 1142, 1184-1185 ; People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 456 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].) G. … (Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d at p. 461; People v. Rodriguez, supra, 42 Cal. 3d 730, 777-779 .) M.

People v. Hill

125 Cal. 16 · California Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1899

The absolute requirement is because of the power given the board to delay opening the polls. … The decisions rendered in Staude v. Election Commrs., 61 Cal. 313 ; Thomason v. Ashworth, 73 Cal. 73; People v. Henshaw, 76 Cal. 436 , and other cases cited, have no bearing whatever upon this matter.

City & County of San Francisco v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.

166 Cal. 244 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1913

Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 29 Wis. 116; Milwaukee etc. *249 Ry. Co. v. Milwaukee, 34 Wis. 271 ; Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co. v. Milwaukee, 95 Wis. 42 , [ 60 Am. St. Rep. 81 , 3 L. R. A. 45, 69 N. … This is clearly decided in City of Los Angeles v.

People v. Ward

110 Cal. 369 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1895

People v. Shaber, 32 Cal. 36 , is another early case. … (People v. Lee, 107 Cal. 477 .)

Sands v. Morongo Unified School District

53 Cal. 3d 863 · California Supreme Court · May 6, 1991

(See, e.g., Board of Education v. Mergens (1990) 496 U.S. 226 [ 110 L.Ed.2d 191 , 110 S.Ct. 2356 ]; Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. … In his dissent, Justice Panelli states that in the high court’s most recent establishment clause case, Board of Education v.

McHatton v. Rhodes

143 Cal. 275 · California Supreme Court · May 14, 1904

. *277 Brown was plaintiff and Hattie Meagher et al. defendants, which judgment directed, among other things, that a deed executed by Henry Diebels and Jennie Diebels to Hattie Meagher be set aside, and further adjudged the … (Janes v. Root, 22 Tex. Civ. App. 413 ; Buse v. Bartlett, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 335 ; Stewart v. Anderson, 70 Tex. 588 ; Thomas v. King, 95 Tenn. 66 ; Gimmell v. Rice, 13 Minn. 400 ; Hoagland v.

Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.

168 Cal. 727 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1914

(Neall v. Hill, 16 Cal. 151 , [ 76 P. 508 ]; French Bank Case, 53 Cal. 495 ; Smith v. Superior Court, 97 Cal. 348 , [ 32 P. 322 ]; Smith v. Los Angeles and P.R. Co., 4 Cal. Unrep. 237 , [ 34 P. 242 ]; Murray v. … In Smith v.

Sinz v. Owens

33 Cal. 2d 749 · California Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1949

by the Board of Medical Examiners of California or of some other state entitled to recognition in this state on the basis of reciprocity. … (Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners, 31 Cal.2d 30 [ 187 P.2d 1 ].)

Churchill v. Lauer

84 Cal. 233 · California Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1890

In Ballou v. … (Cadi gan v. Brown, 120 Mass. 494 .) We find no decision in this state which establishes a contrary doctrine. In the case of Barham v.

In re Clarke

125 Cal. 388 · California Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1899

Some early eases in this state (Deidesheimer v. Brown, 8 Cal. 340 , and Lyman v. … Anderson v.

Teter v. City of Newport Beach

133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 139 · California Supreme Court · Apr 28, 2003

Recently, in Zelig v. … (Brown v. Poway Unified School Dist. (1993) 4 Cal.4th 820, 829 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.2d 679 , 843 P.2d 624 ].)”

People v. Casper

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 43 · California Supreme Court · Jun 3, 2004

Opinion BROWN, J. In this case involving the three strikes law, the trial court dismissed the strike allegation as to 34 of 35 counts. (Pen. Code, 1 §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12; People v. … As we delineated at length in People v.