Case law

Blanco v. Marian Realty Co.

204 Cal. 145 · California Supreme Court · May 2, 1928

The case of Treadwell v. … The cases of Kappes v. Brown Shoe Co., 116 Mo. App. 154 [ 90 S. W. 1158 ], and Burner v. Higman, 127 Iowa, 580 [ 103 N.

Ex Parte Quong Wo

161 Cal. 220 · California Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1911

, was sustained in Wilson v. … In the case of Grumbach v.

People v. Farrara

46 Cal. 2d 265 · California Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1956

Brown, Attorney General, and Joan D. Gross, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. TRAYNOR, J. … In People v.

Dwinnell v. Dyer

145 Cal. 12 · California Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1904

(Cowing v. Rogers, 34 Cal. 648 .) … The court then said: "There is nothing in Atherton v. Fowler ( 96 U.S. 513 ) to the contrary of this." Applying the principles of Belk v.

People v. Parker

218 Cal. Rptr. 3d 315 · California Supreme Court · Jun 5, 2017

Defendant rushed toward her and hit her in the head with a board he had picked up outside the apartment. After knocking her unconscious, he raped her and ejaculated inside her. … Brown was pregnant at the time of Fry’s murder and her son grew up fearful because Brown was so overprotective and afraid of losing him.

People v. Bonin

47 Cal. 3d 808 · California Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1989

Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 538-544 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], reversed on other grounds sub nomine California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538 [ 93 L.Ed.2d 934 , 107 S.Ct. 837 ]. … In conclusion, on this record we find no Brown error. 8.

Berghauser v. Golden State Orchards

208 Cal. 550 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1929

(Yale v. Hoopes, 16 La. Ann. 311 ; Letchford v. Jacobs, 17 La. Ann. 79 ; Field v. Harrison, 20 La. Ann. 411 .) … Co. v. Runkel, 16 Idaho, 192 [18 Ann. Cas. 591, 23. L. R. A. (N. S.) 536, 101 Pac. 396 ]; Houston etc. Co. v. Hechler, 44 Utah, 64 [ 138 Pac. 1159 ]; Langert v. Brown, 3 Wash. Ter. 102 [ 13 Pac. 704 ]; 2 R. C.

Union League Club v. Johnson

18 Cal. 2d 275 · California Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1941

(State v. Zellner, 133 Ohio St. 263 [13 N. E. (2d) 235].) The respondent relies upon Cuzner v. California Club, 155 Cal. 303 [ 100 Pac. 868 , 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1095], and Varcoe v. … (People v. Weitzel, 201 Cal. 116 *279 [ 255 Pac. 792 , 52 A. L. R. 811]; Loew’s Inc. v. Byram, 11 Cal. (2d) 746 [ 82 Pac. (2d) 1 ].)

Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.

158 Cal. 567 · California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1910

(Nunez v. Morgan, 77 Cal. 427 , [ 19 P. 753 ]; Bradford Investment Co. v. Joost, 117 Cal. 204 , [ 48 P. 1083 ].) If the defendant relies upon the statute of frauds against such a complaint he must plead it. (Broder v. … (Barron v. Frink, 30 Cal. 486 ; *Page 574 McGehee v. Hill, 4 Porter (Ala.) 170, [ 29 Am. Dec. 277 ]; Grandy v. McCleese, 2 Jones (47 N.C.) 142.)

Franklin v. Southern Pacific Co.

203 Cal. 680 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1928

This baggage was of the type customarily taken by passengers on board trains for personal use. … In Pilson v.

Regents of University of California v. Riley

199 Cal. 506 · California Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1926

(People v. Dunn, 80 Cal. 211, 214 [ 13 Am. St. Rep. 118 , 22 Pac. 140 ]; McClure v. Riley, 198 Cal. 23 [ 243 Pac. 429 ]. See, also, Estate of Wellings, 192 Cal. 506, 519 [ 221 Pac. 628 ].) … (State v. Sloan, *508 66 Ark. 575 [ 74 Am. St. Rep. 106 , 53 S. W. 47 ].)

Cianci v. Superior Court

40 Cal. 3d 903 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1985

(Marin County Bd. of Realtors, Inc. v. Palsson (1976) 16 Cal.3d 920, 928 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 1 , 549 P.2d 833 ], quoting Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters (1946) 29 Cal.2d 34, 43 [ 172 P.2d 867 ], italics added.) … Moreover, in light of the subsequent unanimous decision of this court in Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v.

Hough v. McCarthy

54 Cal. 2d 273 · California Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1960

(Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Emp. … In Moore v. State Board of Equalization, 76 Cal.App.2d 758 [ 174 P.2d 323 ], an attack was made upon the type of hearing there afforded the petitioner.

Vestal v. Young

147 Cal. 715 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1905

As was said in Brown v. … (See Ewing v. Mott, 90 Cal. 231, 237 , [ 27 Pac. 194 ]; Walker v. Emerson, 89 Cal. 456, 458 , [ 26 Pac. 968 ]; Moore v. Clear Lake W. W., 68 Cal. 146, 150 , [ 8 Pac. 816 ]; Conkling v.

Parrish v. Civil Service Commission

66 Cal. 2d 260 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1967

(Garvin v. Chambers (1924) 195 Cal. 212, 224 [ 232 P. 696 ]; Sheehan v. Board of Police Comrs. (1925) 197 Cal. 70, 78 [ 239 P. 844 ]; Forstner v. … The board of supervisors issued its directive concerning the initiation of the operation on November 21, 1962.

City of Whittier v. Dixon

24 Cal. 2d 664 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1944

(Heron v. Riley, 209 Cal. 507 [ 289 P. 160 ]; Evans v. Superior Court, 215 Cal. 58 [ 8 P.2d 467 ]; Southern Service Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 15 Cal.2d 1 [ 97 P.2d 963 ] ; Powers Farms v. Consolidated Irr. … Respondent contends that by authorizing the appointment of a board of parking place commissioners, the act violates section 13 of article XI of the California Constitution prohibiting the delegation of any municipal function

Lean v. Givens

146 Cal. 739 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 1905

(Dam v. Zink, 112 Cal. 92 ; Sanders v. Russell, 86 Cal. 120 ; 2 Barrett v. Sims, 59 Cal. 615 ; Bowman v. Norton, 16 Cal. 221 ; Ackley v. Chamberlain, 16 Cal. 181 3 ). … v.

La Marche v. New York Life Ins. Co.

126 Cal. 498 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1899

(Wheaton v. North British etc. Ins. Co., 76 Cal. 415 ; 9 Am. St. Rep. 216 ; Hingston v. Insurance Co., 42 Iowa, 46 ; Fitchner v. Fire Assn., 103 Iowa, 276, 279 ; Swan v. Insurance Co., 96 Pa. St. 37; Dowling v. … Co. v. Brown, 50 Mo. App. 461 .)

McWilliams v. City of Long Beach

56 Cal. 4th 613 · California Supreme Court · Apr 25, 2013

Lohman v. Brown (Mo.Ct.App. 1997) 936 S.W.2d 607, 610), Nebraska (Boersma v. Karnes (Neb. 1988) 417 N.W.2d 341, 344), Pennsylvania (Dunn v. … Board of Property Assessment (Pa.Commw.Ct. 2005) 877 A.2d 504, 512), South Dakota (Pourier v. S.D. Dept. of Rev. & Reg. (S.D. 2010) 778 N.W.2d 602, 605-606), and Tennessee (Wicker v.

Turner v. Turner

187 Cal. 632 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1921

Co. v. … (Dam v. Zink, 112 Cal. 91 , [ 44 Pac. 331 ]; McCarthy v.