Case law

Keiper v. Dunn

207 Cal. 643 · California Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1929

For many years a board fence lay to the east of said division line indicated on the Bassett map, distant therefrom, according to the testimony of the witness Rooney, 1.97 feet at the line of K Street and 1.4 feet at the alley … (Winchester v. Payne, 10 Cal. App. 501 [ 102 Pac. 531 ]; Perich v. Maurer, 29 Cal. App. 293 [ 155 Pac. 471 ].) The difficulty in the instant case was to locate the line of the earlier survey.

Selby Realty Co. v. City of San Buenaventura

10 Cal. 3d 110 · California Supreme Court · Sep 27, 1973

(See Russian Hill Improvement Assn. v. *126 Board of Permit Appeals (1967) 66 Cal.2d 34, 39 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 672 , 423 P.2d 824 ]; Brougher v. … (Russian Hill Improvement Assn. v. Board of Permit Appeals, supra, 66 Cal.2d 34 , fn. 5 at p. 37; Cal. Zoning Practice (Cont.Ed.Bar 1969) § 5.57; cf. Keizer v.

Sullivan v. Wellborn

32 Cal. 2d 214 · California Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1948

(See Sheehan v. Board of Police Commrs., 188 Cal. 525 [ 206 P. 70 ]; Nilsson v. State Personnel Board, 36 Cal.App.2d 186 [ 97 P.2d 843 ]; Estate of Lockhart, 21 Cal.App.2d 574 [ 69 P.2d 1001 ].) … (Nathan v. Dierssen, 164 Cal. 607 [ 130 P. 12 ]; Furlong v. Cooney, 72 Cal. 322, 330 [ 14 P. 12 ]; Haggin v. Clark, 51 Cal. 112 .) The cases, Samuels v.

People v. Crowson

33 Cal. 3d 623 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1983

(Brown v. State (Fla.App. 1977) 349 So.2d 1196, 1197 , cert. den. (1978) 434 U.S. 1078 [55 L.Ed.2d785, 98 S.Ct. 1271 ]; Hyland v. Wainwright (Fla.App. 1977) 356 So.2d 14 .) … State Board of Optometry (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 415, 428-430 [ 95 Cal.Rptr. 860 ]; 4 Witkin, Cal.

Dwinnell v. Dyer

145 Cal. 12 · California Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1904

(Cowing v. Rogers, 34 Cal. 648 .) … The court then said: "There is nothing in Atherton v. Fowler ( 96 U.S. 513 ) to the contrary of this." Applying the principles of Belk v.

People ex rel. Dunn v. Van Ness

76 Cal. 121 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1888

(San Francisco v. Heynemann, 71 Cal. 153 .) … (People v. Melone, 73 Cal. 574 .)

People v. Cook

47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 22 · California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2006

Sadler’s head was severely battered and three bloodstained, broken pieces of board were found near his body by officers responding to a 911 call. … Nor has defendant raised any claim, here or below, that Judge Browning, who did preside, was biased. *586 E.

Sheets v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority

56 Cal. 2d 481 · California Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1961

(Triboro Coach Corp. v. New York State Labor R. Board, 286 N.Y. 314 [ 36 N.E.2d 315, 318 ].) (See also West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. … Co. v. Grand Lodge Intl. Assn. of Machinists, 216 F.2d 326, 329 .) One respected author, on the general subject, has taken a contrary position.

Shively v. Eureka Tellurium Gold Mining Co.

129 Cal. 293 · California Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1900

complaint in intervention—disregarding the allegations as to fraudulent conspiracy—is that of a suit brought against the corporation defendant for the use of the president and two directors, constituting a majority of the board … Co. v. Merrill, 108 Cal. 490 ; Pacific Fruit Co. v. Coon, 107 Cal. 447 .) The findings, however, would not justify a judgment for the plaintiff.

Escobedo v. Estate of Snider

14 Cal. 4th 1214 · California Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1997

Co. v. … (Sylva v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 208 Cal.App.3d 648, 654 [ 256 Cal.Rptr. 138 ].)

White v. Ultramar, Inc.

88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 19 · California Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1999

(See Kolstad v. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., and Brown, J., concurred. A11 statutory references are to the Civil Code unless otherwise noted.

People v. Bonin

47 Cal. 3d 808 · California Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1989

Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 538-544 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], reversed on other grounds sub nomine California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538 [ 93 L.Ed.2d 934 , 107 S.Ct. 837 ]. … In conclusion, on this record we find no Brown error. 8.

Greely v. Townsend

25 Cal. 604 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1864

The same point was made in Ferris v. Coover, 11 Cal. 179 , and in Hart v. Burnett, 20 Cal. 169 . In the. former case Mr. … Chief Justice Field in Hart v.

Miller v. Dunn

2 Cal. Unrep. 673 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1886

That act was declared unconstitutional by this court: People v. Parks, 58 Cal. 624 . … It was said by this court in Nougues v.

City of Whittier v. Dixon

24 Cal. 2d 664 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1944

(Heron v. Riley, 209 Cal. 507 [ 289 P. 160 ]; Evans v. Superior Court, 215 Cal. 58 [ 8 P.2d 467 ]; Southern Service Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 15 Cal.2d 1 [ 97 P.2d 963 ] ; Powers Farms v. Consolidated Irr. … Respondent contends that by authorizing the appointment of a board of parking place commissioners, the act violates section 13 of article XI of the California Constitution prohibiting the delegation of any municipal function

People v. Parker

218 Cal. Rptr. 3d 315 · California Supreme Court · Jun 5, 2017

Defendant rushed toward her and hit her in the head with a board he had picked up outside the apartment. After knocking her unconscious, he raped her and ejaculated inside her. … Brown was pregnant at the time of Fry’s murder and her son grew up fearful because Brown was so overprotective and afraid of losing him.

Brady v. Bronson

45 Cal. 640 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

action, being dissatisfied with the amount awarded to him as damages, brought an action and recovered a judgment for an amount larger than that which had been awarded to him, but his judgment had not been presented to the Board … (Murphy v. De Groot, 44 Cal. 51 ; Grigsby v. Burnett, 31 Cal. 406 ; Curran v. Shattuck, 24 Cal. 427 ; Fox v. W. P. R. R., 31 Cal. 538 .)

Ex Parte Quong Wo

161 Cal. 220 · California Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1911

, was sustained in Wilson v. … In the case of Grumbach v.

Alaska Salmon Co. v. Standard Box Co.

158 Cal. 567 · California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1910

(Nunez v. Morgan, 77 Cal. 427 , [ 19 P. 753 ]; Bradford Investment Co. v. Joost, 117 Cal. 204 , [ 48 P. 1083 ].) If the defendant relies upon the statute of frauds against such a complaint he must plead it. (Broder v. … (Barron v. Frink, 30 Cal. 486 ; *Page 574 McGehee v. Hill, 4 Porter (Ala.) 170, [ 29 Am. Dec. 277 ]; Grandy v. McCleese, 2 Jones (47 N.C.) 142.)

Berghauser v. Golden State Orchards

208 Cal. 550 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1929

(Yale v. Hoopes, 16 La. Ann. 311 ; Letchford v. Jacobs, 17 La. Ann. 79 ; Field v. Harrison, 20 La. Ann. 411 .) … Co. v. Runkel, 16 Idaho, 192 [18 Ann. Cas. 591, 23. L. R. A. (N. S.) 536, 101 Pac. 396 ]; Houston etc. Co. v. Hechler, 44 Utah, 64 [ 138 Pac. 1159 ]; Langert v. Brown, 3 Wash. Ter. 102 [ 13 Pac. 704 ]; 2 R. C.