Case law

People v. Wong Wang

92 Cal. 277 · California Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1891

Bank v. … In People v.

Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Reimel

69 Cal. 2d 172 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1968

(Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board (1964) 228 Cal.App.2d 1, 6 [ 39 Cal.Rptr. 192 ] ; see also, e.g., First Industrial Loan Co. v. … In Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co.

Turlock Theatre Co. v. Laws

12 Cal. 2d 573 · California Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1939

Sternes, 79 Cal. 30, 33 [ 21 Pac. 381 ]; Warner v. Warner, 100 Cal. 11, 16 [ 34 Pac. 523 ]; Sheeley v. Jones, supra; Howe v. Tucker, 219 Cal. 193 [ 25 Pac. (2d) 832 ]; Bardwell v. … App. 515 [ 107 Pac. 705 ] (an action brought to establish ownership in the plaintiff of real property pursuant to contract of sale to and a breach by the defendant), and Brown Materials Co. Ltd. v. Angus, 20 Cal.

Stewart v. Van Noy

69 Cal. 2d 296 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1968

(See Notten v. Mensing (1935) 3 Cal.2d 469, 473 [ 45 P.2d 198 ] ; Brown v. Superior Court (1949) 34 Cal.2d 559, 564 [ 212 P.2d 878 ] ; Rundell v. McDonald (1923) 62 Cal.App. 721, 725 [ 217 P. 1082 ] ; James v. … (See Notten v. Mensing, supra, 3 Cal.2d 469, 473 ; Brewer v. Simpson, supra, 53 Cal.2d 567, 592; Lich v. Carlin (1960) 184 Cal.App.2d 128, 138 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 555 ] ; Lewis v.

City of Long Beach v. Mansell

3 Cal. 3d 462 · California Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1970

(See Grants Pass Land & Water Co. v. Brown (1914) 168 Cal. 456, 462 [ 143 P. 754 ]; Frericks v. Sorensen (1952) 113 Cal.App.2d 759 [ 248 P.2d 949 ]; cf. Stamford v. … State Personnel Board (1951) 37 Cal.2d 634, 643 [ 234 P.2d 981 ]; McNeil v.

Reeves v. Hanlon

17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 289 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 2004

Buxbom v. … (Joust v.

Moore v. Pacific Coast Steel Co.

171 Cal. 489 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1915

Defendant operated a large plant composed of several buildings and their yards, all inclosed within a high board fence. In this plant it engaged in the manufacture of steel and iron products. … (Zibbell v. Southern Pac. Co., 160 Cal. 237 , [ 116 Pac. 513 ]; Lucas v. Walker, 22 Cal. App. 296 , [ 134 Pac. 374 ].)

Merchants' Ad-Sign Co. v. Sterling

124 Cal. 429 · California Supreme Court · May 18, 1899

We are cited to the following well-considered and instructive cases as showing that the statute should be given a liberal construction: Brown v. Kling, 101 Cal. 295 ; City Carpet Works v. Jones, 102 Cal. 506 ; Meyers v. … We are pointed to City Carpet Works v.

Blanchard v. Pacific Rolling-Mill Co.

4 Cal. Unrep. 619 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1894

The ship arrived in due course, and defendant was notified that the iron was on board, ready to be discharged, but, owing to the fact that defendant’s wharf was occupied by other vessels, Macondray & Co. were unable to deliver … The case of Dibble v. Corbett, 5 Bosw. (N. Y.) 202, seems to be directly in point as to all the questions here involved.

Las Animas & San Joaquin Land Co. v. Preciado

167 Cal. 580 · California Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1914

(Haggin v. Kelly, 136 Cal. 481 , [ 69 Pac. 140 ] ; Castro v. Barry, 79 Cal. 443 , [ 21 Pac. 946 ] ; Dranga v. Rowe, 127 Cal. 506 , [ 59 Pac. 944 ]; Hancock v. Board of Education, 140 Cal. 554 , [ 74 Pac. 44 ]. … As in Woodruff v.

Dankert v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irrigation District

211 Cal. 87 · California Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1930

(Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irr. Dist., 207 Cal. 215 [ 277 Pac. 487 ].) … (Henderson v. Oroville-Wyandotte Irr. Dist., 207 Cal. 215 *91 [ 277 Pac. 487 ].) Said action was thereafter tried in said Superior Court of the County of Butte and judgment went for plaintiff.

People v. Farrara

46 Cal. 2d 265 · California Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1956

Brown, Attorney General, and Joan D. Gross, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. TRAYNOR, J. … In People v.

City St. Improvement Co. v. City of Marysville

155 Cal. 419 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1909

(See, also, Beswick v. Platt, 140 Pa. 28 , [ 21 Atl. 306 ]; Board of Commissioners v. O’Connor, 137 Ind. 622 , [ 35 N. E. 1006, 1012 , 37 N. E. 16 ]; Laycock v. Parker, 103 Wis. 161 , [ 79 N. … The case of Schmidt v.

Agnew v. Costa

27 Cal. 425 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1865

(Palmer v. The Grand Junction Railway Company, 4 Mees. and Wels. 749; Clarke v. The Rochester and Syracuse Railroad Company, 14 N. Y. 574 .) In the case at bar, the boilers were either sufficient or insufficient. … Upon the exclusion of Coffee’s deposition, the defendant offered to prove “ that all skill and care and prudence were used, as far as human foresight would go, and that defendant did in fact provide and have on board a good

In Re Michele D.

128 Cal. Rptr. 2d 92 · California Supreme Court · Dec 16, 2002

She told Ferrari she went outside, smoked a cigarette, and then boarded a bus with Cameron. … In People v.

John L. v. Superior Court

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 261 · California Supreme Court · Jun 17, 2004

Garner v. … The judgment of the Court of Appeal is affirmed. *281 WE CONCUR: GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ.

Housing Authority v. Superior Court

35 Cal. 2d 550 · California Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1950

To justify the issuance of a writ of prohibition, it must be shown that the act sought to be restrained is judicial in nature (Quinchard v. Board of Trustees, 113 Cal. 664 [ 45 P. 856 ]; Duke v. … Oakland Water Front Co., 118 Cal. 160, 193 [ 50 P. 277 ]; McPherson v. Richards, 134 Cal.App. 462, 466 [ 25 P.2d 534 ]; Weisman v. Board of B. & S. Commrs., 85 Cal.App. 493 [ 259 P. 768 ].)

Zumwalt v. Superior Court

49 Cal. 3d 167 · California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1989

In Crane v. … Therefore, while we agree with petitioner that article I, section 26, 15 commands obedience to all provisions of the Constitution, and prohibits disobedience (State Board of Education v.

Dunn v. Mackey

80 Cal. 104 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1889

(Janin v. Browne, 59 Cal. 37, 44 .) … Reil, 51 Barb. 30 ; Lawton v. Reil, 34 How. Pr. 465 ; Ferner v. Collins, 1 Martin, N. S., 369; Cross v. Richardson, 7 Mart. (La.) 166.) The case of Donnelly v. Strueven, supra, is in point.

People v. Crandell

46 Cal. 3d 833 · California Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1988

(People v. Allen, supra, 42 Cal.3d at p. 1277; People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 541 .) … (People v. Brown, supra, at p. 542, fn. 13, original italics.)