Case law

In Re Shapiro

14 Cal. 3d 711 · California Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1975

(Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole (1973) 366 F.Supp. 270 ; Jones v. Johnston (1974) 368 F.Supp. 571 ; Fitzgerald v. Sigler (1974) 372 F.Supp. 889 ; contra, Thomas v. … United States Board of Parole (D.Kan. 1973) 354 F.Supp. 273 .)

Conniff v. City of San Francisco

67 Cal. 45 · California Supreme Court · May 22, 1885

The grading of streets of the city of San Francisco can only be done under an order of the board of supervisors. … (See Baron v. Baltimore, 2 Am. Jur. 203 , cited, commented upon, and approved in Stetson v. Faxon, 19 Pick. 147 ; 31 Am. Dec. 123 ; Gardner v. Newburgh, 2 Johns. Ch. 162 ; 7 Am. Dec. 526 ; Phinizy v.

Reeves v. Hanlon

17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 289 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 2004

Buxbom v. … (Joust v.

Boermeester v. Carry

California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2023

Finally, we must acknowledge, as we did in People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 892, 899, that it is not uncommon for victims of intimate partner violence to recant. … Brown and Candace C. Sandoval for California Hospital Association as Amicus Curiae. Counsel who argued in Supreme Court (not intended for publication with opinion): Mark M.

Locke v. Locke

153 Cal. 56 · California Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1908

her business in Colorado- *58 and came to California in October, 1905, that during the time since leaving Colorado she has been unable to support herself, but has been assisted by friends to the extent of being furnished board … (See Thompson v. Thompson, 121 Cal. 11 , [ 53 Pac. 403 ].)

Gray v. Union Trust Co.

171 Cal. 637 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1915

Code, sec. 2280; 2 Perry on Trusts, 6th ed., sec. 920; Brown v. Brown, 97 Ga. 531 , [33 L. R. A. 816, 25 S. E. 353 ]; 39 Cyc. 99.) … In Warner v.

Tevis v. Savage

130 Cal. 411 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1900

Code, sec. 1624, subd. 2; Clay v. Walton, 9 Cal. 328, 333 ; Ellison v. Jackson Water Co., 12 Cal. 542, 553 ; Harris v. Frank, 81 Cal. 280, 286 .) … That such promise is not within the statute of frauds, see Brandt on Suretyship and Guaranty, sec. 49; Brown on the Statute of Frauds, sec. 187; McLaren v. Hutchinson, 22 *416 Cal. 187, 190 1 ; Malone v.

Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co.

169 Cal. 619 · California Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1915

Co. v. Kane, 118 Fed. 234 , [ 55 C. C. A. 129 ]; Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co., 121 Cal. 232 , [ 53 Pac. 651 ] ; Heitman v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co., 10 Cal. App. 398 , [ 102 Pac. 15 ] ; Wilkinson v. … Co., 35 Utah 110 , [ 99 Pac. 466 ]; Bates v. San Pedro, etc. R. Co. 38 Utah 569 , [ 114 Pac. 527 ]; Brown v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co., 167 Cal. 199, 204 , [ 138 Pac. 1005 ].)

Keyes v. Little York Gold Washing & Water Co.

53 Cal. 724 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1879

In Mayor v. … In Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns.

O'Sullivan v. Griffith

153 Cal. 502 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1908

(Hickman v. Alpaugh, 21 Cal 266 ; Hill v. Grigsby, 32 Cal. 60 ; Masters v. Lash, 61 Cal. 624 ; Shumway v. Leakey, 67 Cal. 460 , [ 8 Pac. 12 ] ; Mortimer v. Marder, 93 Cal. 178 , [ 28 Pac. 814 ] ; Lux v. … Haggin, 69 Cal. 255 , [ 4 Pac 919 , 10 Pac. 674 ] ; Cavallaro v. Texas etc. Ry. Co., 110 Cal. 357 , [ 52 Am. St. Rep. 94 , 42 Pac. 918 ] ; Brown v. San Francisco Gas Co., 58 Cal. 426 .)

Crouch v. Gilmore Oil Co., Ltd.

5 Cal. 2d 330 · California Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1936

Again in Fahey v. Madden, 56 Cal. … Under such circumstances it must be held on the authority of Maupin v. Solomon supra, that, as to the defendant Madden, it was error to submit the case to the jury. (See, also, Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 39 Cal.

People v. Loewen

35 Cal. 3d 117 · California Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1983

Georgia (1980) 448 U.S. 438, 440 [ 65 L.Ed.2d 890, 893 , 100 S.Ct. 2752 ]; Brown v. Texas (1979) 443 U.S. 47, 51 [ 61 L.Ed.2d 357, 362 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 ].) … (People v. Bower (1979) 24 Cal.3d 638, 645 [ 156 Cal.Rptr. 856 , 597 P.2d 115 ]; see also Brown v. Texas, supra, 443 U.S. at p. 52 [61 L.Ed.2d at pp. 362-363].)

Hurgren v. Union Mutual Life Insurance

141 Cal. 585 · California Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1904

In Clark v. … In Brown v. Randall, 36 Conn. 56 , 1 the court held as follows: “It is not necessary to sustain an action for malicious prosecution, that the defendant should be acquitted in the criminal proceeding.

Myers v. State Bar

4 Cal. 2d 528 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1935

(Goldstone v. State Bar, 214 Cal. 490, 498 [ 6 Pac. (2d) 513 , 80 A. L. R. 701].) … For that reason I hesitate to agree to an order which in effect reverses the decision of the Board of Governors of The State Bar. Shenk, J., concurred.

Jones v. Spears

56 Cal. 163 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

There is nothing in the case of the Board of Commissioners v. Younger, 29 Cal. 147 , or in the case of Prescott v. Salthouse, 58 id. 221 , in conflict with these views. Order reversed.

Ericksen v. Southern Pacific Co.

39 Cal. 2d 374 · California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1952

R. v. Brown, 218 F. 625, 627 .) Where obstructions exist on, over or near the tracks, it is the duty of the railroad toward its employees to give sufficient warning by means of telltales or other devices. … R. v. Brown, supra; Humphfres v. Western Pac. Ry. Co., 173 Cal. 428, 433 [ 160 P. 415 ].) The reason for the rule is obvious.

Dunn v. Mackey

80 Cal. 104 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1889

(Janin v. Browne, 59 Cal. 37, 44 .) … Reil, 51 Barb. 30 ; Lawton v. Reil, 34 How. Pr. 465 ; Ferner v. Collins, 1 Martin, N. S., 369; Cross v. Richardson, 7 Mart. (La.) 166.) The case of Donnelly v. Strueven, supra, is in point.

John L. v. Superior Court

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 261 · California Supreme Court · Jun 17, 2004

Garner v. … The judgment of the Court of Appeal is affirmed. *281 WE CONCUR: GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ.

Meyer v. Bishop

129 Cal. 204 · California Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1900

A board of directors was elected and elaborate by-laws adopted. … To quote from Perkins v.

Stewart v. Van Noy

69 Cal. 2d 296 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1968

(See Notten v. Mensing (1935) 3 Cal.2d 469, 473 [ 45 P.2d 198 ] ; Brown v. Superior Court (1949) 34 Cal.2d 559, 564 [ 212 P.2d 878 ] ; Rundell v. McDonald (1923) 62 Cal.App. 721, 725 [ 217 P. 1082 ] ; James v. … (See Notten v. Mensing, supra, 3 Cal.2d 469, 473 ; Brewer v. Simpson, supra, 53 Cal.2d 567, 592; Lich v. Carlin (1960) 184 Cal.App.2d 128, 138 [ 7 Cal.Rptr. 555 ] ; Lewis v.