Case law

Syrek v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

54 Cal. 2d 519 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1960

Board of Public Works, 341 U.S. 716 [ 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 ], Adler v. Board of Education of The City of New York, 342 U.S. 485 [ 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 ], Steinmetz v. … (Beilan v. Board of Education, 357 U.S. 399 [ 78 S.Ct. 1317 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1414 ]; Lerner v. Casey, 357 U.S. 468 [ 78 S.Ct. 1311 , 2L.Ed.2dl423].)

Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.

216 Cal. 285 · California Supreme Court · Sep 1, 1932

Brown, 37 Wash. 97 [ 107 Am. St. Rep. 798 , 68 L. R. A. 889, 79 Pac. 635, 638 ]; Co. v. Baldridge, 278 U. S. 104, 113 [ 73 L. Ed. 204 , 49 Sup. Ct. Rep. 57]; Messner v. Board of Dental Examiners, 87 Cal. … If they owed their first allegiance to their employer, the corporation, as was held in People v.

Imperial Water Co. v. Board of Supervisors

162 Cal. 14 · California Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1912

(People v. Supervisors, 8 Cal. 61 ; People v. Supervisors, 10 Cal. 344 ; Eldorado v. Elstner, 18 Cal. 149 ; Murray v. Board, 23 Cal. 494 ; Miller v. Board, 25 Cal. 97 ; Keys v. Marin Co., 42 Cal. 254 ; Smith v. … Strother, 68 Cal. 196 , [ 8 Pac. 852 ]; Wulzen v. Board, 101 Cal. 24 , [ 40 Am. St. Rep. 17 , 35 Pac. 353 ].)

Stanley-Taylor Co. v. Board of Supervisors

135 Cal. 486 · California Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1902

The board rejected all bids “for the reason that public policy demands such action be taken.” … If the discretion to be exercised by *489 the inferior tribunal or board was intended to be final, or if there is any other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy, mandamus will not lie. (Wood v.

Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

1 Cal. 3d 351 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1969

(Dresser v. City of Torrance (1956) 140 Cal.App.2d 42, 48 [ 294 P.2d 962 ]; Brown v. State Personnel Board (1941) 43 Cal.App.2d.70, 78-82 [ 110 P.2d 497 ]; La Shells v. … Board of Education (1941) 17 Cal.2d 753, 761 [ 112 P.2d 229 ]; Dresser v. City of Torrance (1956) 140 Cal.App.2d 42, 47-49 [ 294 P.2d 962 ]; Brown v.

Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy

2 Cal. 4th 999 · California Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1992

Pharmacy Board. v. Va. Consumer Council (1975) 425 U.S. 748 ( 48 L.Ed.2d 346, 365 , 96 S.Ct. 1817 )] and Bates [v. … Pharmacy Board. v. Va. Consumer Council, supra, 425 U.S. 748 , and Bates v.

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

61 Cal. 2d 305 · California Supreme Court · May 19, 1964

(Levers v. Berkshire, 151 F.2d 935 ; Black v. Magnolia Liquor Co., 355 U.S. 24 [ 78 S.Ct. 106 , 2L.Ed.2d 5].) … (Texas Liquor Control Board v. Continental Distilling Sales Co. (Tex. Civ. App. 1947) 199 S.W.2d 1009, 1014 ; see also Downer v. Liquor Control Com., 134 Conn. 555 [ 59 A.2d 290 ].)

Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors

189 Cal. 254 · California Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1922

In Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors, 131 Cal. 364 [ 82 Am. St. … Dist. v. Bradley, supra; Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors, supra; see, also, other cases hereinabove cited on that subject).

State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court

20 Cal. 2d 467 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1942

(Brown v. State Personnel Board, 43 Cal. App. (2d) 70 [ 110 P. (2d) 497 ].) … (Wiles v. State Personnel Board, 19 Cal. (2d) 344 [ 121 P. (2d) 673 ]; Kelly v. State Personnel Board, 31 Cal. App. (2d) 443 [ 88 P. (2d) 264 ].)

Leroy T. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

12 Cal. 3d 434 · California Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1974

Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (People v.

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

69 Cal. 2d 506 · California Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1968

The State Board of Equalization, after a hearing, affirmed the denial of the *511 refund and subsequently denied a petition for a rehearing. The present action was therefore timely commenced. In El Dorado Oil Works v. … Franchise Tax Board, 246 Cal.App.2d 812 , at page 819 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 299 ] : “The Franchise Tax Board is given discretion in the selection of [the] factors to be utilized in a tax formula (FI Dorado Oil Works v.

Rice v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

21 Cal. 3d 431 · California Supreme Court · May 30, 1978

In Parker v. Brown (1943) 317 U.S. 341 [ 87 L.Ed. 315 , 63 S.Ct. 307 ] and Bates v. … (Note, Parker v. Brown Revisited: The State Action Doctrine After Goldfarb, Cantor, and Bates (1977) 77 Colum.L.Rev. 898.)

McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board

49 Cal. 3d 348 · California Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1989

Similarly, in Labor Board v. … (Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equal. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 557, 561 [ 59 P.2d 119 ]; Whitten v. California State Board, etc., supra, 8 Cal.2d 444, 445-446 ; Drummey v.

Ford v. Board of State Harbor Commissioners

81 Cal. 19 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1889

Several authorities have been cited in support of this proposition, chief among which are *26 People v. Hill, 7 Cal. 103 , and People v. Jewett, 6 Cal. 291 . But none of them are directly in point. … (People v. Squires, 14 Cal. 13 .) In People v. Jewett, supra, cited by plaintiff, it was held that the power to create an office included the power to destroy or abolish it. In People v.

Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

52 Cal. 2d 287 · California Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1959

Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, Sac. 7040, ante, page 238 [ 340 P.2d 1 ], and Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, L. A. 24698, ante, page 259 [ 341 P.2d 291 ]. … (Const., art XX, §22; Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, Sac. 7040, supra, ante, p. 238.)

Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

1 Cal. 3d 351 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1969

(Dresser v. City of Torrance (1956) 140 Cal.App.2d 42, 48 [ 294 P.2d 962 ]; Brown v. State Personnel Board (1941) 43 Cal.App.2d.70, 78-82 [ 110 P.2d 497 ]; La Shells v. … Board of Education (1941) 17 Cal.2d 753, 761 [ 112 P.2d 229 ]; Dresser v. City of Torrance (1956) 140 Cal.App.2d 42, 47-49 [ 294 P.2d 962 ]; Brown v.

Fruehauf Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

68 Cal. 2d 569 · California Supreme Court · May 14, 1968

Petitioners, Fruehauf Corporation and its insurance carrier, seek review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board (hereinafter board) awarding compensation to Thomas C. … (Mullarkey v. New York Hospital (1962) 228 N.Y.S.2d 238; Goyer v. Fred K. Blanchard, Inc. (1966) 25 App.Div.2d 892 [269 *576 N.Y.S.2d 338]; Wehling v.

Steinmetz v. California State Board of Education

44 Cal. 2d 816 · California Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1955

(Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 492-493 [ 72 S.Ct. 380 , 96 L.Ed. 517 , 27 A.L.R. 472 ]; Pockman v. … (See Garner v. Board of Public Works, 341 U.S. 716, 719-720 [ 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 ]; Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485, 492-493 [ 72 S.Ct. 380 , 27 A.L.R.2d 472 ].)

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

62 Cal. 2d 589 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1965

(Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 287, 291, 293 [ 341 P.2d 296 ] ; cf. Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners, 57 Cal.2d 74, 87 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 488 , 366 P.2d 816 ].) … (Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, supra, 52 Cal.2d 287, 294 .)

Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

55 Cal. 2d 867 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1961

(Weiss v. State Board of Equalization (1953), 40 Cal.2d 772, 775 [3] [ 256 P.2d 1 ], quoting from Stoumen v. Reilly (1951), 37 Cal. 2d 713, 717 [4] [ 234 P.2d 969 ].) … Weiss v. State Board of Equalization (1953), supra, 40 Cal.2d 772, 775 [2, 3].)