Case law

Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California

55 Cal. 4th 747 · California Supreme Court · Nov 26, 2012

Green __________________________________________________________________________________ Counsel: Browne George Ross, Brown Woods George, Allan Browne, Eric M. George, Benjamin D. … George Browne George Ross 2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 274-7100 Kathleen M.

Berroteran v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court · Mar 7, 2022

SC20130071); (2) Dokken v. Ford Motor Co. (Super. Ct. Sutter County, No. CVCS131994); and (3) Brown v. Ford Motor Company (Super. Ct. … The final deposition, conducted in June 2017 in connection with Brown v. Ford Motor Company (see ante, fn. 5), reflects substantial discussion about its intended future use.

In Re Romero

207 Cal. 341 · California Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1929

This contention is based entirely upon the decision in the case of Robertson v. Langford, 95 Cal. App. 414 [ 273 Pac. 150 ], rendered December 13, 1928. … This was held in the recent case of Platnauer v. Board of Supervisors, 65 Cal.

CBS, INC. v. Block

42 Cal. 3d 646 · California Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1986

(Cohen v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 40 Cal.3d 277, 286 , quoting IT Corp. v. County of Imperial (1983) 35 Cal.3d 63, 69-70 [ 196 Cal.Rptr. 715 , 672 P.2d 121 ]; accord Robbins v. … (Cohen v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 40 Cal.3d at pp. 286-287.)

People v. Hastings

34 Cal. 571 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1868

The duplicate can afford no aid, as we pointed out in The People v. … The case of The People v. Holladay, 25 Cal. 300 , therefore, has no application.

Anzar v. Miller

90 Cal. 342 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1891

The claim of Modesto was never presented to the United States board of land commissioners for confirmation. … In San José v.

People v. Kelly

1 Cal. 4th 495 · California Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1992

He relies primarily on language in People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], reversed on related grounds sub nomine California v. … (People v. Beardslee (1991) 53 Cal.3d 68, 117 [ 279 Cal.Rptr. 276 , 806 P.2d 1311 ]; People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 448 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].)

Cortez v. Abich

51 Cal. 4th 285 · California Supreme Court · Jan 24, 2011

(See Ramirez v. Nelson (2008) 44 Cal.4th 908, 916-917 [ 80 Cal.Rptr.3d 728 , 188 P.3d 659 ]; Fernandez v. … Defendants next urge us to follow the lead of Rogers v.

Wood v. Anderson

199 Cal. 440 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1926

(Raymond v. Laboudigue, 148 Cal. 691, 694 [ 84 Pac. 189 ]; Buckmaster v. Bertram, 186 Cal. 673, 676 [ 200 Pac. 610 ]; Patterson v. Reddish, 56 Cal. App. 197, 202 [ 204 Pac. 565 ]; Allman v. Rich (Cal. … The case is a clear example of the danger noted in the admonition of Browne on the Statute of Frauds, 5th edition, section 473, and quoted in Hambey v.

McLane v. Placerville & Sacramento Valley R.R.

66 Cal. 606 · California Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1885

These powers are given to boards of directors, and are usually exercised by a quorum, which, unless changed by statute or by-law, is a majority of the board. … Co. v.

Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Dunbar

80 Cal. 530 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1889

Code, secs. 1460-1466; *535 Cole v. Hughes, 54 N. Y. 444 ; 13 Am. Rep. 611 ; Bloch v. Isham, 28 Ind. 37 ; 92 Am. Dec. 287 ; Scott v. McMillan, 76 N. Y. 144 .) … Proc., sec. 1951; Brown v. Griffith, 70 Cal. 14 .) It is otherwise under the code as amended. (Stats. 1889, p. 45.) There was a motion for a nonsuit, which was denied.

In Re Polizzotto

188 Cal. 410 · California Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1922

The petitioner is imprisoned in the county jail of Stanislaus County upon a charge of violating an ordinance adopted by the board of supervisors of said county on January 19, 1921, declaring it to be a mis *411 demeanor for … App. 229 [ 199 Pac. 1090 ]; Ex parte Crookshank, 269 Fed. 980 ; Woods v. City of Seattle, 270 Fed. 315 . [4] 3.

Stitt v. State Bar

21 Cal. 3d 616 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1978

(See Gibson v. … The dictum to the contrary in Schullman v. State Bar (1973) 10 Cal.3d 526, 536 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 161 , 516 P.2d 865 ], footnote 4, is disapproved.

Nickley v. Stearns Ranchos Co.

126 Cal. 150 · California Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1899

We are not unmindful that this statute was attacked in Holley v. … (In re Irrigation Dist., 117 Cal. 382 ; City Council v. Fowler, 48 S. C. 8.) The judgment is affirmed. Temple, J., and McFarland, J., concurred.

People v. Lamson

1 Cal. 2d 648 · California Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1934

Brown. Later the undertaker arrived, and a little later Dr. … This rule is elementary and is aptly restated in the case of People v.

Hartwell Corporation v. Superior Court

115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 874 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2002

In Waters v. … WE CONCUR: GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, BROWN and MORENO, JJ.

Mayock v. Kerr

216 Cal. 171 · California Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1932

(See Osborn v. Board of Supervisors, 27 Cal. App. 85 [ 148 Pac. 970 ]; Ley v. Dominguez, 212 Cal. 587 [ 299 Pac. 713 ].) … Petitioner also refers to and relies upon the minute order of this court of July 8, 1932, in the case of Burke v. Backs, L. A.

People v. Selma Irrigation District

98 Cal. 206 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1893

(Turlock Irrigation District v. Williams, 76 Cal. 360 ; Central Irrigation District v. De Lappe, 79 Cal. 351 ; Crall v. Poso Irrigation District, 87 Cal. 140 ; People v. … See also upon this point Welch v. St. Genevieve, 1 Dillon Cir. Ct. 130.)

England v. Hospital of the Good Samaritan

14 Cal. 2d 791 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1939

(Messenger v. Anderson, 225 U.S. 436 [ 32 S.Ct. 739 , 56 L.Ed. 1152 ]; Seagraves v. Wallace, 69 Fed.2d 163; McGovern v. … The board of directors consists of the bishop of the diocese, the rector of St. Paul's Episcopal Church and certain parishioners of the diocese.

Gutierrez v. Brinkerhoff

2 Cal. Unrep. 232 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1883

Confirmation of his claim to the extent of three square leagues of land was made by the board. … Williams, 26 Cal. 309 ; Gregory v. Haworth, 25 Cal. 653 ; Davis v. Mitchell, 34 Cal. 90 . Order affirmed. We concur: Sharpstein, J.; Myriek, J.