Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.72s
Elk Hills Power v. Board of Equalization
57 Cal. 4th 593 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 2013
Co. v. … (Board of Regents v.
Cited 68 timesPublishedHolland v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 1
58 Cal. 4th 482 · California Supreme Court · Jan 23, 2014
(People v. … [Citations.]’ ” (Horwich v. Superior Court (1999) 21 Cal.4th 272, 276 [ 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 222 , 980 P.2d 927 ].) The text of section 62.1(b) offers little support for the Appeal Board’s interpretation.
Cited 37 timesPublishedVoss v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
10 Cal. 3d 583 · California Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1974
In Zeeb v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Zeeb v. Workmen’s Comp. App.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBoard of Directors v. Superior Court
58 Cal. 2d 599 · California Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1962
The board’s position is that, under the bylaws of the hospital, only members of the medical staff may treat patients in the hospital, that Dr.Rosner is not a member, and that therefore the board cannot be compelled to permit … In Rosner v. Eden Township Hospital Dist., ante, p. 592 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 551 , 375 P.2d 431 ], this day filed, it was concluded that the board must admit Dr. Rosner to membership on its staff.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWilson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
16 Cal. 3d 181 · California Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1976
In Hinojosa v. Workmen’s Comp. … Co. v. Bayside L. Co. (1920) 182 Cal. 140 [ 187 P. 735 ]; State Ins. Fund v. Industrial Comm. (1964) 15 Utah 2d 363 [ 393 P.2d 397 ]; 1 Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 15.14; cf. Pacific Indem. Co. v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedBurroughs v. Board of Medical Examiners
31 Cal. 2d 864 · California Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1947
This is a companion case to Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners, ante, p. 30 [ 187 P.2d 1 ], this day decided, and also to Aarons v. Board of Medical Examiners, ante, p. 863 [ 187 P.2d 8 ].
Cited 2 timesPublishedChristian v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
15 Cal. 4th 505 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1997
However, the Board found no justification for the assessment of multiple penalties for “that single act of *509 misconduct.” 4 In so doing the Board relied primarily on Gallamore and Jardine v. Workers’ Comp. … J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred. All undesignated statutory references are to the Labor Code.
Cited 11 timesPublishedAarons v. Board of Medical Examiners
31 Cal. 2d 863 · California Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1947
This is a companion case to Mann v. Board of Medical Examiners, ante, p. 30 [ 187 P.2d 1 ], this day decided, and also to Burroughs v. Board of Medical Examiners, post, p. 864 [ 187 P.2d 9 ].
Cited 2 timesPublishedPrice v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
37 Cal. 3d 559 · California Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1984
Upon reconsideration, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (board) rescinded the award based on the “going and coming rule.” … The board relied on the fact that Price was not on the employer’s premises when he was injured. Therefore, they concluded that he had not completed his journey to work. (See General Ins. Co. v. Workers’ Comp.
Cited 15 timesPublishedLaTourette v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
17 Cal. 4th 644 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1998
Co. v. Ind. Acc. … J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., and Brown, J., concurred.
Cited 16 timesPublishedMeredith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
19 Cal. 3d 777 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1977
In Sail’er Inn, Inc. v. … {Mathews v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1972) 6 Cal.3d 719, 738-740 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 301 , 493 P.2d 1165 ]; Western Indemnity Co. v. Pillsbury (1915) 170 Cal. 686, 702-703 [ 151 P. 398 ]; Saal v. Workmen’s Comp.
Cited 8 timesPublishedHogan v. Midland National Insurance
3 Cal. 3d 553 · California Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1970
Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. … (Mannheimer Bros. v. Kansas Casualty & Surety Co. (1921) 149 Minn. 482 [ 184 N.W. 189, 190 ]; Prince v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. (N.D. 1966) 143 N.W.2d 708, 717 ; Globe Navigation Co. v.
Cited 138 timesPublishedKatz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
30 Cal. 3d 353 · California Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1981
that he had failed to reveal a fee arrangement (see Koker v. … For the reasons set forth in Hustedt v. Workers' Comp.
Cited 4 timesPublishedParatransit, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
59 Cal. 4th 551 · California Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2014
Claimant appealed to the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (Board). … Relying on Rowe v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedRodgers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
36 Cal. 3d 330 · California Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1984
In Witt v. Jackson (1961) 57 Cal.2d 57 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 366 P.2d 641 ] and Roe v. Workmen’s Comp. … In Kemerer v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedMacGregor v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
37 Cal. 3d 205 · California Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1984
While the Board’s appeal was pending, this court decided Norman v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, supra, 34 Cal.3d 1 . In Norman we discussed the meaning of “good cause” under section 1256. … (Evenson v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., supra, 62 Cal.App.3d at p. 1016 ; Zorrero v. Unemployment Ins.
Cited 8 timesPublishedRubino v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
8 Cal. 3d 405 · California Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1972
The Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (hereinafter referred to as “the board”) appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “claimant”) after a limited trial de novo following claimant’s appeal … Thereafter, the board reversed the determination of the referee.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Franklin Fire Ins. Co. of Phila.
178 Cal. 302 · California Supreme Court · May 24, 1918
The finding of the court that Brown owned the property is supported by the evidence. The judgment is therefore affirmed. Melvin, J., and Victor B. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred.
Cited 3 timesPublishedFriends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors
8 Cal. 3d 247 · California Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1972
Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Com'n (2d Cir. 1972) 455 F.2d 412 , 418-421.) … Siller v. Board of Supervisors (1962) 58 Cal.2d 479, 484 [ 25 Cal.Rptr. 73 , 375 P.2d 41 ].)
Disapproved on other grounds by Kowis v. Howard, 3 Cal. 4th 888 (1992)Cited 339 timesPublishedAgricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court
16 Cal. 3d 392 · California Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1976
Board v. Cities Service Oil Co. (2d Cir. 1941) 122 F.2d 149, 152 .] … The court therefore granted enforcement of the board’s order of access. (Accord, Richfield Oil Corp. v.
Cited 210 timesPublished
Ask Donna