Case law

Dietzel v. Anger

8 Cal. 2d 373 · California Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1937

(See Carson v. Long-Bell Lumber Co., 73 Fed. (2d) 397; *377 Lidgerwood v. Hale & Kilburn Corp., 47 Fed. (2d) 318; Craig v. Consolidated Cement Corp., 69 Fed. (2d) 613; Allan v. … (Brown v. Denver Omnibus & Cab Co., 254 Fed. 560, 569 ; see, also, 41 Yale L. J. 774; 27 Columb. L. Rev. 579; 2 Jones, Bonds and Bond Securities, sec. 1153, p. 561.) But no such circumstances are presented here.

Kelly v. Central Pacific Railroad

74 Cal. 557 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1888

(Mortlock v. Buller, 10 Ves. *308; Cadman v. Horner, 18 Ves. 11; Seymour v. Delancy, 6 Johns. Ch. *222; Jackson v. Ashton, 11 Pet. 248 ; Barksdale v. Payne, Riley, *178; Frisby v. Ballance, 4 Scam. 299 ; Clement v. … If, therefore, the case of Morrison v. Lods is to be construed as affirming any such doctrine, it does not state the law correctly. The case of Board of Commissioners v.

Hamilton v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

33 Cal. 2d 202 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1948

(Stringer v. Young, 191 N.Y. 157, 166 [ 83 N.E. 690 ] ; Clay v. Hamilton, 116 Ind.App. 214, 221 [ 63 N.E. 207 ]; Hendrick v. … Brown, 218 Mass. 33, 35 [ 105 N.E. 637 ]; see Estate of Hubbell, 121 Cal.App. 38, 40 [ 8 P.2d 530 ]; Fletcher v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank, 182 Cal. 177,185 [ 187 P. 425 ]; Peoples Bank of Bloomington v.

People v. Beardslee

53 Cal. 3d 68 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1991

As the majority opinion acknowledges, the United States Supreme Court established in Brown v.

People v. Aguilar

60 Cal. 4th 862 · California Supreme Court · Jan 12, 2015

(See, e.g., People v. … Name of Opinion People v.

Libarian v. State Bar

38 Cal. 2d 328 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1952

38 Cal.2d 328 (1952) MANASSEE STEPHEN LIBARIAN, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. L. A. No. 22063. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. Jan. 29, 1952. … The Board of Governors of the State Bar has recommended that Manassee Stephen Libarian be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months.

Sunder v. Collins

219 Cal. 430 · California Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1933

(Kavanagh v. Board of Police Fund Commrs., 134 Cal. 50 [ 66 Pac. 36]; 20 Cal. Jur. 999.)

People v. Plyler

121 Cal. 160 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1898

(People v. Sprague, 53 Cal. 494 ; People v. Soto, 59 Cal. 368 .) The proposed instruction is an accurate exposition of its meaning, and should have been given. … (People v. Dodge, 28 Cal. 445 ; People v. McCrory, 41 Cal. 458 ; People v. Brown, 46 Cal. 103 .)

Price v. Civil Service Commission

26 Cal. 3d 257 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1980

(See Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280, 301-302 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 551 P.2d 28 ].) … Only in the last quarter century, beginning with Brown v.

Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co. v. City of Los Angeles

207 Cal. 430 · California Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1929

The case of Bancroft v. … Justice Wilbur in Western Salt Co. v.

Kendall v. Porter

120 Cal. 106 · California Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1898

(Meyer v. Brown, 65 Cal. 583 ; Davis v. Porter, 66 Cal. *108 658 ; Bates v. Porter, 74 Cal. 224 ; Bates v. Gerber, 82 Cal. 550 ; Davis v. Sacramento, 82 Cal. 562 ; Kennedy v. Sacramento, 10 Saw. 29 .) … Bates v. Gerber, supra, affirmed the case of Davis v.

People v. Blodgett

46 Cal. 2d 114 · California Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1956

Brown, Attorney General, Clarence A. Linn, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Victor Griffith, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. TRAYNOR, J. … (People v. Brown, 45 Cal.2d 640 [ 290 P.2d 528 ]; People v. Simon, 45 Cal.2d 645 [ 290 P.2d 531 ].)

Golden Gate Scenic Steamship Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

57 Cal. 2d 373 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1962

(Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358, 369 [ 66 S.Ct. 637, 643 , 90 L.Ed. 718, 727 , 162 A.L.R. 1445 ] ; California Emp. etc. Com. v. … (Johnston v. Board of Supervisors, 31 Cal.2d 66, 74 [7] et seq. [ 187 P.2d 686 ].) (3) An erroneous administrative construction does not become decisive of the law no matter how long it is continued.

People v. Mendez

81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 301 · California Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1999

Holland (1978) 23 Cal.3d 77 , 151 Cal.Rptr. 625 , 588 P.2d 765 ; In re Brown (1973) 9 Cal.3d 679 , 108 Cal.Rptr. 801 , 511 P.2d 1153 ; People v. … (See People v. Lloyd (1998) 17 Cal.4th 658, 667 , 72 Cal. Rptr.2d 224 , 951 P.2d 1191 (dis. opn. of Brown, J.)

Caldwell v. Bruning

64 Cal. 2d 111 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1966

Adams v. Doyle (1903) supra, 139 Cal. 678 .) Holbrook v. Board of Directors etc. Irr. Dist. (1937) 8 Cal.2d 158 [ 64 P.2d 430 ], dealt with the terms of office of directors of an irrigation district. … (See Hol *118 brook v. Board of Directors etc. Irr.

Wylie v. Sierra Gold Co.

120 Cal. 485 · California Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1898

(Board of Commrs. v. Younger, 29 Cal. 147 ; 87 Am. Dec. 164 ; Mott v. Foster, 45 Cal. 72 .)

Bay City Building & Loan Ass'n v. Broad

136 Cal. 525 · California Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1902

sums as may be borrowed by the corporation for the purpose, shall be loaned out in open meeting to the member who shall bid the highest premium, or may be loaned at such premium as may be fixed from time to time by the board … (Union Water Co. v. Murphy’s Flat Fluming Co., 22 Cal. 620 ; Grangers’ Business Assn. v. Clark, 67 Cal. 634 ; Camp v. Land, 122 Cal. 167 .) 2.

Cross v. Kitts

69 Cal. 217 · California Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1886

(Roath v. Driscoll, 20 Conn. 640 ; see also Hanson v. McCue, 42 Cal. 303 ; Ballard v. Tomlinson, 24 Am. Law Reg. 636 .) … In Brown v.

People v. Weeren

26 Cal. 3d 654 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1980

People v. … (Skiriotes, supra, at p. 75 [ 85 L.Ed. at p. 1199 ]; Felton v. Hodges (5th Cir. 1967) 374 F.2d 337, 339 ; State v. Bundrant (Alaska 1976) 546 P.2d 530, 550-554 ; see United States v.

Shively v. Bozanich

7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 576 · California Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2003

Simpson for the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman. Ultimately, the grand jury proceeding was dismissed and the prosecution proceeded by way of information. … (Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. (1994) 7 Cal.4th 926, 931 [ 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 440 , 873 P.2d 613 ]; Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co. (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1103, 1109 [ 245 Cal.Rptr. 658 , 751 P.2d 923 ]; Schneider v.