Case law

Wirin v. Parker

48 Cal. 2d 890 · California Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1957

Brown, Attorney General, and William E. James, Deputy Attorney General, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent. TRAYNOR, J. … City of Long Beach, 101 Cal.App.2d 871, 881 [ 226 P.2d 694 ]; Wirin v. Horrall, 85 Cal.App.2d 497, 504-506 [ 193 P.2d 470 ]; Brown v. Boyd, 33 Cal.App.2d 416, 418 [ 91 P.2d 926 ]; see Simpson v.

Foster v. Bowles

138 Cal. 346 · California Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1903

(Kelly v. Leachman (Idaho), 33 Pac. Rep. 44 .) … (Concannon v. Smith, 134 Cal. 14 ; State Loan etc. Co. v. Cochran, 130 Cal. 251 ; Chaffee v. Browne, 109 Cal. 218 .)

Lacrabere v. Wise

7 Cal. Unrep. 107 · California Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1903

As said in Ivory v. Brown (opinion filed November 17, 1902), 137 Cal. 603 , 70 Pac. 657 : “The defendants neither paid rent, nor heeded the notice, but remained in possession. The action was commenced May 11, 1900.

City of Coronado v. City of San Diego

97 Cal. 440 · California Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1893

(Maurer v. Mitchell, 53 Cal. 289 .) … It was held in Maurer v.

Morris v. De La Torre

30 Cal. Rptr. 3d 173 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2005

BROWN, J., Concurring. I concur in the judgment based on the limited facts before us. … (See Delgado v. Trox Bar & Grill (2005) 36 Cal.4th 224, 258 [ 30 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 113 P.3d 1159 ] (dis. opn. of Kennard, J.).) Moreno, J., concurred.

People v. Grimes

1 Cal. 5th 698 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 2016

(Id. at p. 155; see id. at pp. 174-175 (cone. opn. of Brown, J.); cf. … (People v. Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d at p. 448.) 7 We must therefore set aside the judgment of death. B.

City of Los Angeles v. McCollum

156 Cal. 148 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1909

In Helm v. … (Brown v. Stark, 83 Cal. 636 , [ 24 Pac. 162 ].) What we have already said concerning the map filed by Mrs.

Emeric v. Penniman

26 Cal. 119 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1864

(He nderson v. Pointdexter, 12 Wheat. 543 ; Hall v. Doe, 19 Ala. 386 ; M inturn v. Brower, 24 Cal. 644 .) … (Pell v. Farquar, 3 Blackford, 331.) In Estrada v.

People v. Denomme

6 Cal. Unrep. 227 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1899

In Sullivan v. Royer, 72 Cal. 248 , 1 Am. St. … In People v. Wheeler, 60 Cal. 581 , 44 Am. Rep. 70 , it was held error to allow the district attorney to read from “Browne’s Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity,” against the objection of defendant.

Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. County of San Diego

51 Cal. 2d 759 · California Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1959

(Board of County Com’rs of Sedgwick County v. United States, 105 P. Supp. 995, 1001.) … In Board of County Com’rs of Sedgwick County v.

Rideaux v. Torgrimson

12 Cal. 2d 633 · California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1939

(Brown v. Superior Court, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 693 [ 57 Pac. (2d) 965 ]; Spitzer v. Superior Court, 74 Cal. App. 494 [ 241 Pac. 270 ].) Such defense is waived if not raised either by the pleadings or the evidence. … (Reidy v. Superior Court, 220 Cal. 111 [ 29 Pac. (2d) 780 ]; United Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Superior Court, 205 Cal. 167 [ 270 Pac. 184 ]; Baird v. Superior Court, 204 Cal. 408 [ 268 Pac. 640 ].)

In Re Estate of Harkness

176 Cal. 537 · California Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1917

(See McKinley v. Tuttle, 34 Cal. 235 .) … (People v. Sing Yow, 145 Cal. 1 , [ 78 Pac. 235 ]. See, also, *542 Estate of Emerson, 170 Cal. 81 , [ 148 Pac. 523 ]; People v. Oxnam, 170 Cal. 211 , [ 149 Pac. 165 ]; Atkinson v. Western Dev.

Ring v. State Bar

4 Cal. 2d 196 · California Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1935

Petitioner did not appear at the hearing before the local administrative committee or before the board of governors. … (Ri ng v. State Bar, 218 Cal. 747 [ 24 Pac. (2d) 821 ].) The misconduct charged in the present proceeding took place during approximately the same period as the acts for which he is already being disciplined.

Ellis v. Eastman

32 Cal. 447 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1867

(Smith v. Morse, 2 Cal. 524 ; Heydenfeldt v. Hitchcock, 15 Cal. 514 ; The People ex rel. The Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. The Broadway Wharf Company, 31 Cal. 33 .)

HESLEP v. City of Sacramento

2 Cal. 580 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1852

during the recent difficulties, and as a testimony of our high appreciation of the manner in which he has discharged his duties as Chief Magistrate of this city, an appropriation of ten thousand dollars be made by this board … (Smith v. Ware, 13 Johns.) If it should be contended that this appropriation was a gratuity or gift, the argument is answered by the fact, that there is no delivery or acceptance. Judgment affirmed.

Reina v. Cross

6 Cal. 29 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1856

That defendant received said freight on board his vessel and departed on the voyage, but did not perform his contract, because of the loss of said vessel at sea. … See also Samson v. Ball, 4 Dallas, 459 ; Giles v. Brig Cynthia, 1 Pet. Admr. R , 203, et seq.; Chinot v. Barker, 2 John. R., 346; Gillan v. Simkin, 4 Camp., 241; Harris v. Rand, 4 N. Hamp.

Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLC

39 Cal. 4th 223 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 2006

(Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 438 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 111 P.2d 610 ]; see also Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. … San Francisco Airports Com. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 352, 361 [ 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 654 , 981 P.2d 499 ]; McKinny v. Board of Trustees (1982) 31 Cal.3d 79, 90 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 549 , 642 P.2d 460 ].)

In Re Bloom

44 Cal. 3d 128 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1987

When the leased airplane arrived in Houston, the pails of explosives were loaded on board. … While we independently determine the facts (Alberton v.

Shaver v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.

10 Cal. 396 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

This question arose in the case of Moss v. … (Sherwood v. Dunbar, 6 Cal., 52 .)

Flood v. Templeton

148 Cal. 374 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1905

Such was the case in Owens v. McNally, 113 Cal. 444 , [ 45 Pac. 710 ], and that, also, of McCabe v. Healy, 138 Cal. 81 , [ 70 Pac. 1008 ]. It is said in Jaffe v. … In Healy v. Simpson, 113 Mo. 340 , [ 20 S.