Case law

Rideaux v. Torgrimson

12 Cal. 2d 633 · California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1939

(Brown v. Superior Court, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 693 [ 57 Pac. (2d) 965 ]; Spitzer v. Superior Court, 74 Cal. App. 494 [ 241 Pac. 270 ].) Such defense is waived if not raised either by the pleadings or the evidence. … (Reidy v. Superior Court, 220 Cal. 111 [ 29 Pac. (2d) 780 ]; United Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Superior Court, 205 Cal. 167 [ 270 Pac. 184 ]; Baird v. Superior Court, 204 Cal. 408 [ 268 Pac. 640 ].)

People v. Kidd

56 Cal. 2d 759 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1961

(People v. Jones, 160 Cal. 358, 364-365 [ 117 P. 176 ]; People v. Capps, 129 Cal.App.2d 429, 430-431 [ 277 P.2d 39 ] ; People v. Vollmann, 73 Cal.App. 2d 769 , 789 et seq. [ 167 P.2d 545]; People v. Campos, 10 Cal. … They cite People v.

Bisinger v. Sacramento Lodge No. 6

187 Cal. 578 · California Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1921

Brown on May 31, 1911. … The rule on that subject on appeal is thus stated in Hale v. San Bernardino etc.

People v. Weeren

26 Cal. 3d 654 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1980

People v. … (Skiriotes, supra, at p. 75 [ 85 L.Ed. at p. 1199 ]; Felton v. Hodges (5th Cir. 1967) 374 F.2d 337, 339 ; State v. Bundrant (Alaska 1976) 546 P.2d 530, 550-554 ; see United States v.

Californians for Disability Rights v. Mervyn's, LLC

39 Cal. 4th 223 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 2006

(Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 438 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 111 P.2d 610 ]; see also Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. … San Francisco Airports Com. (1999) 21 Cal.4th 352, 361 [ 87 Cal.Rptr.2d 654 , 981 P.2d 499 ]; McKinny v. Board of Trustees (1982) 31 Cal.3d 79, 90 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 549 , 642 P.2d 460 ].)

Gracey v. City of Merced

200 Cal. 482 · California Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1927

(Dodge v. Pond, 23 N. Y. 69 .) … Dodge v. Pond, 23 N. Y. 69 ; Lynn v. Gephart, 27 Md. 547 , and 2 Story’s Eq. Jur., sec. 1214, are cited by defendant’s counsel in support of this position. In Lynn v.

Emeric v. Penniman

26 Cal. 119 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1864

(He nderson v. Pointdexter, 12 Wheat. 543 ; Hall v. Doe, 19 Ala. 386 ; M inturn v. Brower, 24 Cal. 644 .) … (Pell v. Farquar, 3 Blackford, 331.) In Estrada v.

In Re Bloom

44 Cal. 3d 128 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1987

When the leased airplane arrived in Houston, the pails of explosives were loaded on board. … While we independently determine the facts (Alberton v.

Shaver v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.

10 Cal. 396 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

This question arose in the case of Moss v. … (Sherwood v. Dunbar, 6 Cal., 52 .)

Caldwell v. Bruning

64 Cal. 2d 111 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1966

Adams v. Doyle (1903) supra, 139 Cal. 678 .) Holbrook v. Board of Directors etc. Irr. Dist. (1937) 8 Cal.2d 158 [ 64 P.2d 430 ], dealt with the terms of office of directors of an irrigation district. … (See Hol *118 brook v. Board of Directors etc. Irr.

County of Los Angeles v. Jones

13 Cal. 2d 554 · California Supreme Court · May 22, 1939

“The board of supervisors of the county of Los Angeles instituted the original proceedings in each instance. … (East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. v. Garrison, 191 Cal. 680, 688 [ 218 Pac. 43 ] ; Mulvill v. City of San Diego, 183 Cal. 734 [ 192 Pac. 702 ]; Merced County v. Helm, 102 Cal. 159 [ 36 Pac. 399 ] ; Creighton v.

Ellis v. Eastman

32 Cal. 447 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1867

(Smith v. Morse, 2 Cal. 524 ; Heydenfeldt v. Hitchcock, 15 Cal. 514 ; The People ex rel. The Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. The Broadway Wharf Company, 31 Cal. 33 .)

Hildreth v. White

66 Cal. 549 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1885

The description of the premises in controversy was sufficient. ( Whitney v. Buckman, 19 Cal. 300 ; Castro v. Gill, 5 Cal. 40 ; Stanley v. Green, 12 Cal. 148 ; People v. Leet, 23 Cal. 163 .) The complaint was sufficient. … house and corral known as ‘ McKay’s winter quarters ’ is situated, and the lands enclosed by said corral, being about two acres of land, more or less, together with said house and corral; the said house being a one-story board

Longshore v. County of Ventura

25 Cal. 3d 14 · California Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1979

(Miller v. State of California (1977) 18 Cal.3d 808, 814 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 386 , 557 P.2d 970 ]; Boren v. State Personnel Board (1951) 37 Cal.2d 634, 641 [ 234 P.2d 981 ].) … (McNeil v. Board of Retirement (1958) 51 Cal.2d 278, 285-286 [ 332 P.2d 281 ]; Boren v. State Personnel Board, supra, 37 Cal.2d 634, 643 .) In Martin v.

People v. Robertson

48 Cal. 3d 18 · California Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1989

(People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 448 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].) … Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 536-540 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ], revd. on other grounds California v. Brown (1987) 479 U.S. 538 [ 93 L.Ed.2d 934 , 107 S.Ct. 837 ].)

Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. Clark

22 Cal. 2d 287 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1943

In the recent case of Williams v. … (Boone v. Kingsbury, 206 Cal. 148 [ 273 P. 797 ]; California E. Com. v. Black-Foxe Military Inst., 43 Cal.App.2dSupp. 868 [ 110 P.2d 729 ]; Hodge v. McCall, 185 Cal. 330 [ 197 P. 86 ]; Bank of Italy v.

Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports Commission

87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 654 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1999

(Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 438 [ 261 Cal.Rptr. 574 , 777 P.2d 610 ].)” We therefore proceed to consider whether ABC has standing to assert such a challenge on behalf of its members. … Under these circumstances, the Board’s action is entitled to deference.” {Ibid.)

Erreca v. Meyer

142 Cal. 308 · California Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1904

In Brown v. Johnson, 45 Cal. 76 , a judgment for the value, without any provision for the delivery of the property, was upheld. … In Seligman v.

Usher v. Henkel

205 Cal. 413 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1928

Brush are the surviving members of the last board of directors of the said Southern Land Company.” … In the case of Ransome-Crummey Co. v.

Sprague v. Norway

31 Cal. 173 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1866

(Hunt v. Holden, 2 Mass. 170 ; Avery v. Pixley, 4 Mass. 460 ; Williamson v. Farrow, 1 Bailey, 611 ; Commonwealth v. Chambre, 4 Dall. 143 ; Pyle v. Maulding, 7 J. J. Marsh. 202; Commonwwealth v. Shortridge, 3 J. J. … Marsh. 638; Kimball v. Lamson, 2 Verm. 138 ; Strong v. Birchard, 5 Conn. 357 ; Churchill v. Merchants’ Bank, 19 Pick. 535 ; Bartol v. Calvert, 21 Ala. 42 ; and Brewer v. Harris, 5 Gratt. 285 .)