Case law

Guest v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

2 Cal. 3d 670 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1970

It *674 was held in Garzoli that it was “a reasonable extension of the exception laid down in Smith [Smith v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … The decision of respondent appeals board is annulled, and the cause is remanded to the board for further procedings consistent with the views herein expressed. Wright, C.

Parks v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

33 Cal. 3d 585 · California Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1983

Exch. v. Ind. Acc. … (Freire v.

Pickwick Stages v. Board of Trustees

189 Cal. 417 · California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1922

(Holmes v. Richet, 56 Cal. 311 [ 38 Am. Rep. 54 ]; Harrison v. McCormick, 69 Cal. 619 [ 11 Pac. 456 ]; Gregory v. Bovier, 77 Cal. 124 [ 19 Pac. 232 ]; Meeker v. Dalton, 75 Cal. 156 [16 Pac. 764]; Mills v. … Fletcher, 100 Cal. 148 [ 34 Pac. 637 ] ; McDougald v. Hulett, 132 Cal. 160 [ 64 Pac. 278 ] ; Hibernia etc. Soc. v. Insurance Co., 138 Cal. 260 [ 71 Pac. 334 ].) The code provides that the answer shall contain: 1.

Pacific Co. v. Board of Supervisors

8 Cal. 2d 611 · California Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1937

Co. v. Los Angeles County, 212 Cal. 121 [ 298 Pac. 9 ], and Ingels v. Riley, 5 Cal. (2d) 154 [ 53 Pac. (2d) 939 , 103 A. L. … Co. v.

Maxwell v. Board of Fire Commission

139 Cal. 229 · California Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1903

“The board may appoint a secretary, who shall perform such duties as the board may prescribe. He shall receive an annual salary of two thousand four hundred dollars.” … It simply declares that the board “may appoint a secretary, who shall perform such duties as the board may prescribe.”

Ralston v. Board of Supervisors

51 Cal. 592 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

By the Court: The petition to the Board of Supervisors for the division of Swamp Land District No. 2, and for the formation of a new district, did not state the necessary jurisdictional facts. … district formed prior to March 28, 1868, and in which the lands have not been reclaimed, desire to have *594 their lands set off from such district, they must, in addition to the petition required in section 3446, show to the Board

Bland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

3 Cal. 3d 324 · California Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1970

As this court observed in French v. … In Sutton v. Industrial Acc.

Carian v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

36 Cal. 3d 654 · California Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1984

B. v. J. P. … (Virginia Electric Co. v. Board (1943) 319 U.S. 533, 540 [ 87 L.Ed. 1568, 1574 , 63 S.Ct. 1214 ]; see also Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co. (1953) 344 U.S. 344, 348 [ 97 L.Ed. 377, 382 , 73 S.Ct. 287 ]; cf.

Johnson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

37 Cal. 3d 235 · California Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1984

Accordingly, in 1972, the board for the first time awarded appellate costs. (DeWall v. Ford Motor Co. (1972) 70 ING 11842.) … (Wilson v. Board of Retirement [(1959)] 176 Cal.App.2d 320, 323 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 373 ].) What is reasonable presents a question of fact . . . .’” (Bank of Idaho v.

Barnes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 638 · California Supreme Court · Jul 10, 2000

In such circumstances, the Board can, in addition to a general award of present medical benefits, authorize what is known as a precautionary or provisional award of future medical treatment. (Kauffman v. Workmen’s Comp. … Co. v. Dept, of Indus. Relations (1929) 207 Cal. 144 [ 277 P. 492 ] (Fidelity)-, Llewellyn Iron Wks. v. Indus. Acc. Com. (1933) 129 Cal.App. 449 [ 18 P.2d 975 ]; 2 Hanna, Cal.

Goytia v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

6 Cal. 3d 660 · California Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1972

(Goytia v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 889 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 591 , 464 P.2d 47 ].) … Thus, because the applicants in both Jeffares v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 548 [ 86 Cal.Rptr. 288 ] and Esparza v.

Hildebrand v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

19 Cal. 3d 765 · California Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1977

The board adopted the foregoing findings and conclusions. … In Stimpel v.

May v. Board of Directors

40 Cal. 2d 221 · California Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1953

(May v. Board of Directors, 34 Cal.2d 125 [ 208 P.2d 661 ].) … Under the irrigation district law if assessments are not properly levied as required by the board of directors of the district, the county board of supervisors must do it. (Wat.

State Board of Equalization v. Watson

68 Cal. 2d 307 · California Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1968

It follows, as in County of Sacramento v. … Proc., §1085; County of Sacramento v. Hickman. (1967) supra, 66 Cal.2d 841, 845 , and eases cited.)

Sumner v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

33 Cal. 3d 965 · California Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1983

In Johnson v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Zenith Insurance Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 124 Cal.App.3d 176 .)

Glick v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

23 Cal. 3d 493 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1979

In Syrek v. … Substantial evidence supports the trial court’s decision affirming the board’s determination. In light of the guidelines which we established in Sanchez v. Unemployment Ins.

Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

15 Cal. 3d 559 · California Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1975

Exch. v. Ind. Acc. … The decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board is hereby annulled and the cause remanded to that board for proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed. Wright, C.

Massey v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

5 Cal. 4th 674 · California Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1993

Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]) and to give the statute a reasonable construction conforming to that intent (Clean Air Constituency v. … F. v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

O'Reilly v. Board of Medical Examiners

66 Cal. 2d 381 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1967

(See Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra; Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 62 Cal.2d 589, 594-595 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 633 , 400 P.2d 745 ]; Brown v. … Accordingly, the case must be remanded to the board for reconsideration of the penalty assessed. (See Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 35 Cal.2d 242, 252 [ 217 P.2d 630 , 18 A.L.R.2d 593 ]; Garfield v.

Gregory v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

12 Cal. 3d 899 · California Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1974

Corley v. … In Roe v. Workmen’s Comp.