Case law

Taylor v. Taylor

192 Cal. 71 · California Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1923

v. … Brown, 170 Cal. 1, 6 [ 147 Pac. 1168 ]), and now operates as an estoppel in contract.

Raynor v. Drew

72 Cal. 307 · California Supreme Court · May 20, 1887

(Browne on Statute of Frauds, sec. 32.) Such a lease, therefore, would not be void. … (Boggs v. Merced Mining Co., 14 Cal. 368 ; Kelly v. Taylor, 23 Cal. 15 ; Carpentier v. Thirston, 24 Cal. 281 ; Maine Boys T. Co. v. Boston T. Co., 37 Cal. 50 .)

Berger v. O'HEARN

41 Cal. 2d 729 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1953

(Bank of America v. Thomas, 7 Cal.2d 154, 156 [ 59 P.2d 990 ] ; Barclay v. Blackinton, 127 Cal. 189, 193-194 [ 59 P. 834 ] ; McMillan v. Hayward, 94 Cal. 357, 361 [ 29 P. 774 ] ; Dodson v. … Browne, 59 Cal. 37, 43 ), and brought his action after 10 days from the date his claim was presented. (Prob. Code, §712; San Francisco Bank v. St.

Brooks v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.

110 Cal. 173 · California Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1895

In Rice v. … Mitchell, 46 Cal. 578 ; Gillespie v. Jones, 47 Cal. 264 ; Chapin v. Bourne, 8 Cal. 294 ; Harrison v. Peabody, 34 Cal. 178 ; Dreyfous v. Adams, 48 Cal. 131 ; Benedict v. Cozzens, 4 Cal. 381 ; Cordor v.

Becker v. Beldt

205 Cal. 491 · California Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1928

Code; Hemenway v. Thaxter, 150 Cal. 737 [ 90 Pac. 116 ]; Gray v. Brunold, 140 Cal. 615 [ 74 Pac. 303 ].) … Proc.; Brown v. Campbell, 100 Cal. 635 [ 38 Am. St. Rep. 314 , 35 Pac. 433 ]; Bank of South San Francisco v. Pike, 53 Cal. App. 524 [ 200 Pac. 752 ]; 23 Corpus Juris, p. 344).” (Horan v.

Cowan v. Their Creditors

77 Cal. 403 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1888

.) ■ ■ The leading case in favor of the proposition that partnership property is exempt is Stewart v. Brown, 37 N. Y. 350 ; 93 Am. Dec. 578 . … (And see Gaylord v. Imhoff, 26 Ohio St. 317 ; 20 Am. Rep. 762 ; Guptil v. McFee, 9 Kan. 30 ; Spiro v. Paxton, 3 Lea, 75 ; 31 Am. Rep. 630 ; Gill v. Latterman, 9 Lea, 381 ; White v. Heffner, 30 La.

People v. Gray

California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 2023

(State v. … Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 892, 899 (Brown) [describing the complications presented in domestic violence cases, including “ ‘victims who refuse to testify, who recant previous statements, or whose credibility is attacked by

Shrimpton v. Superior Court of L. A.Cty.

22 Cal. 2d 562 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1943

In Stanton v. … Reference to this case may be found in Ivory v. Superior Court, supra, and Bank of America v. Superior Court, supra. In Lankton v.

Jorgensen v. Jorgensen

32 Cal. 2d 13 · California Supreme Court · May 28, 1948

Howard v. … Southern California Edison Co., 172 Cal. 601, 609 [ 158 P. 328 ]; see, Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1, 5 [ 147 P. 1168 ]; Lindley v. Hinch, 57 Cal.App.2d 717, 719 [ 135 P.2d 421 ].)

Himmelmann v. Spanagel

39 Cal. 389 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

It was held, in Poett v. Stearns ( 28 Cal. 226 ), and Anthony v. … The doctrine is well settled in this Court, in Emery v. San Francisco Gas Co. ( 28 Cal. 345 ); Emery v. Bradford ( 29 Cal. 75 ); Nolan v. Reese ( 32 Cal. 484 ), and Himmelmann v.

McCreery v. Sawyer

52 Cal. 257 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

(Leroy v. Cunningham, 44 Cal. 600 ; Low v. Lewis, 46 Ibid. 549; Van Hastrup v. Madison City, 1 Wall. 297 ; Dupond v. Barstow, 45 Cal. 451 ; Doll v. Meador, 16 Ibid. 325; Randall v. Austin, 46 Ibid. 269; Wetherbee v. … Cunningham) “ for the Board of Supervisors, in which the defendant had no concern, inasmuch as he was not entitled to the conveyance.” ( 44 Cal. 609 .) 2.

Union Transportation Co. v. Sacramento County

42 Cal. 2d 235 · California Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1954

Hargro v. Hodgdon, supra; Niles v. City of Los Angeles, supra; Bolger v. Foss, 65 Cal. 250, 251 [ 3 P. 871 ] ; Harding v. … (Mulch v.

Sacramento Bank v. Alcorn

121 Cal. 379 · California Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1898

(Bateman v. Burr, 57 Cal. 480 ; Durkin v. Burr, 60 Cal. 360 ; Carey v. Brown, 62 Cal. 373 ; Savings and Loan Soc. v. Deering, 66 Cal. 281 ; More v. Calkins, 95 Cal. 435 ; 29 Am. St. Rep. 128 ; Savings and Loan Soc. v. … (Tyler v. Granger, 48 Cal. 259 .)

Merriam v. Bachioni

112 Cal. 191 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1896

Brown, 70 Cal. 544 ; Young v. Shinn, 48 Cal. 26 .) … (See Thrift v. Delaney, 69 Cal. 188 , and cases cited.) ' Appellant lays stress on Shinn v.

Hoff v. Vacaville Unified School District

80 Cal. Rptr. 2d 811 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1998

(See Figone v. … (See Nunn v.

People v. Reliford

130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 254 · California Supreme Court · Feb 10, 2003

In People v. … (See Falsetta, supra, 21 Cal.4th 903, 926 (conc. opn. of Brown, J.).)

People v. Pierce

61 Cal. 2d 879 · California Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1964

(Self v. Self, 58 Cal.2d 683 [ 26 Cal.Rptr. 97 , 376 P.2d 65 ]; Klein v. Klein, 58 Cal.2d 692 [ 26 Cal.Rptr. 102 , 376 P.2d 70 ].) … Brown, 131 Cal.App.2d 643 [ 281 P.2d 319 ]), and *881 the logic of this rule would extend to a wife who conspires with others against her husband.

Estate of McDill

14 Cal. 3d 831 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1975

. *833 COUNSEL Sullivan & Brown, William H. Sullivan and John Adler for Petitioner and Appellant. Langford & Lane, James M. Lane and Merrill Brown for Claimants and Respondents. OPINION RICHARDSON, J. … [Citations.]" ( Wemyss v.

Ferguson v. Keays

4 Cal. 3d 649 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1971

Brown, 106 Cal.App.2d 686, 688-689 [ 235 P.2d 632 ], each involving the cost of transcripts on appeal. … Shaffer, 385 U.S. 1037 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 683 , 87 S.Ct. 772 ] (Douglas, J. dissenting from den. of cert); Lee v. Habib (1970) 424 F.2d 891 [ 137 App.D.C. 403 ]; Brown v.

Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.

96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 518 · California Supreme Court · Jun 5, 2000

Brown for California District Attorneys Association as Amicus Curiae. *519 BAXTER, J. In this matter, a companion to Kraus v. … GEORGE, C.J., MOSK, J., KENNARD, J., CHIN, J., and BROWN, J., concur. Concurring Opinion by WERDEGAR, J.