Case law

People v. Monstad

209 Cal. 658 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1930

Co. v. Kimball, 114 Cal. 414 [ 46 Pac. 275 ]. … Co. v. Hamilton, 161 Cal. 610 *663 [37 L. R A. (N.

McCray v. State Bar

38 Cal. 3d 257 · California Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1985

(c); Himmel v. … We generally give the reviewing board’s recommendation of discipline the greater weight. (Tomlinson v. State Bar (1975) 13 Cal.3d 567, 578 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 335 , 531 P.2d 1119 ].)

People v. Bauer

1 Cal. 3d 368 · California Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1969

Logan, 41 Cal.2d 279, 290-291 [ 260 P.2d 20 ] [robbery and assault with a deadly weapon]; People v. Brown, 49 Cal.2d 577, 590-594 [ 320 P.2d 5 ] [abortion and murder]; Neal v. … Brown, supra, 49 Cal.2d 577, 591 .) (10) Under this principle, the taking of several items during the course of a robbery may not be used to furnish the basis for separate *377 sentences.

Murphy v. City of San Luis Obispo

39 L.R.A. 444 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1898

In the case of Skinner v. … In Tebbe v. Smith, 108 Cal. 101 , Mr.

Wilcoxson v. Stitt

65 Cal. 596 · California Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1884

The same construction was given to a similar clause in the case of Manning v. Brown, 1 Fairf. 49. The same principle was sustained in Kentucky, in Barbours’ Exrs. v. Brookie, 3 Marsh. J. J. 511.” *599 Canfield v. … In Cartwright v.

North Alaska Salmon Co. v. Hobbs, Wall & Co.

159 Cal. 380 · California Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1911

In Browning v. … The distinction was not necessary to the decision in Browning v. McNear. The appellant insists that the decision in Jackson v. Porter, 151 Cal. 32 , [ 90 P. 122 ], is contrary to this doctrine and decisive of this case.

E. Clemens Horst Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

184 Cal. 180 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1920

(Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. Pillsbury, 171 Cal. 319 , [ 153 Pac. 24 ] ; Western Metal Supply Co. v. Pills bury, 172 Cal. 413 , [Ann. Cas. 1917E, 390, 156 Pac. 491 ] ; Carstens v. … In Western Indemnity Co. v.

Hamer v. Town of Ross

59 Cal. 2d 776 · California Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1963

This latter test has, indeed, been expressed in an unbroken array of decisions from Zahn v. Board of Public Works (1925) 195 Cal. 497 [ 234 P. 388 ] through Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. … (Miller v. Board of Public Works (1925) 195 Cal. 477, 495 [ 234 P. 381 , 38 A.L.R. 1479 ].)

People v. Yeager

194 Cal. 452 · California Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1924

It was said in People v. … Brown, and he answered that juror Brown had made up his mind and would convict appellant; and that on the ground of a life-long acquaintance with Lorentzen, Kennedy, on December 13, 1923, refused to make an affidavit of the

People v. Bauer

1 Cal. 3d 368 · California Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1969

Logan, 41 Cal.2d 279, 290-291 [ 260 P.2d 20 ] [robbery and assault with a deadly weapon]; People v. Brown, 49 Cal.2d 577, 590-594 [ 320 P.2d 5 ] [abortion and murder]; Neal v. … Brown, supra, 49 Cal.2d 577, 591 .) Under this principle, the taking of several items during the course of a robbery may not be used to furnish the basis for separate *377 sentences.

Lane v. Bing

202 Cal. 577 · California Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1927

The case of Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co., 39 Cal. … The latest decision of this court touching this subject is that of Kish v.

Newport Wharf & Lumber Co. v. Drew

141 Cal. 103 · California Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1903

The other defendants are members of the board of trustees of the asylum. … The principle controlling this case is stated by the supreme court of the United States in United States v. Denver, 106 U.

Williams v. Lerch

56 Cal. 330 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

(Means v. Williamson, 37 Mc. 556.) … (Barney v. Brown, 2 Vt. 374 .) And in Montgomery v.

Kripp v. Curtis

71 Cal. 62 · California Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1886

(Clark v. Rugg, 2 Roll. Abr. 60; Smyles v. Hastings, 22 N. Y. 217 .) … (Lansing v. Wiswell, 5 Denio, 213 .)

Himmelmann v. Spanagel

39 Cal. 389 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

It was held, in Poett v. Stearns ( 28 Cal. 226 ), and Anthony v. … The doctrine is well settled in this Court, in Emery v. San Francisco Gas Co. ( 28 Cal. 345 ); Emery v. Bradford ( 29 Cal. 75 ); Nolan v. Reese ( 32 Cal. 484 ), and Himmelmann v.

Willey v. Crocker-Woolworth Nat. Bank

141 Cal. 508 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1904

As is stated in Brennan v. … Though the cases are to the same effect: Lord v. Baldwin, 6 Pick. 352 ; Van Valen v. Russell, 13 Barb. 592 ; Allen v. Brown, 39 Iowa, 330 ; and Brown's Appeal, 17 Pa. St. 484.)

City of Pasadena v. Stimson

91 Cal. 238 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1891

Neither is the vaccination case (Abeel v. Clark, 84 Cal. 226) opposed to our views. … In Earle v. Board of Education, 55 Cal. 489 , and in Miller v.

Elkins v. Superior Court

63 Cal. Rptr. 3d 483 · California Supreme Court · Aug 6, 2007

Code, § 210.) 14 Respondent relies upon this court’s decision in In re Marriage of Brown & Yana (2006) 37 Cal.4th 947 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.3d 610 , 127 P.3d 28 ] (Brown & Yana) for the proposition that courts have discretion not … (Brown & Yana, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 959 ; see id. at pp. 955-956; Montenegro v.

Cain v. State Bar

25 Cal. 3d 956 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1979

(See Hamilton v. State Bar (1979) 23 Cal.3d 868 , *961 878 [ 153 Cal.Rptr. 602 , 591 P.2d 1254 ]; Weir v. State Bar (1979) 23 Cal.3d 564, 570, 576 [ 152 Cal.Rptr. 921 , 591 P.2d 19 ].) … (Weir v. State Bar, supra, 23 Cal.3d 564, 576 ; Worth v. State Bar (1978) 22 Cal.3d 707, 711 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 273 , 586 P.2d 588 ].)

Declez v. Save

71 Cal. 552 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1887

(Emerson v. Santa Clara, 40 Cal. 545 ; Bunten v. Orient Ins. Co., 4 Bosw. 262 .) The complaint shows that the plaintiff and defendant were directors of an association engaged in publishing a newspaper in Los Angeles. … Plaintiff by authority of the board of managers or directors, and with the knowledge of defendant, contracted for and procured the construction of a partition through *554 the hall, at an expense of $75.86, which sum was